-
Type:
Sub-task
-
Status: Done
-
Priority:
High
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Company:All Clients/Multiple Clients
Hi Molly Ronovsky & Kristen: Please check the attached mockups and provide your feedback onto the same.
Aruna Raheja
added a comment - Hi Molly Ronovsky & Kristen : Please check the attached mockups and provide your feedback onto the same.
CC: Samir Swapnil Pandhare I like the idea of it being a pop-up on the same page vs. going to a new page; that way it's all done in one step/page.
As mentioned on the call, we will need to accommodate non-mapped fields so that we can indicate settings on these, as well as well as you all were going to go back to discuss how to make the labels simpler for the user to understand what the check is for / should only check one box.
One question I do have - are these rights for preview, candidate, or both? I'm just thinking a field might be editable by the admin when previewing but when it's sent, it should be view only to everyone (ie salary). Does that make sense? Not sure if we have accounted for the difference?
Aruna Raheja Looking at the modal... the Dark blue background behind the title seems unnecessary. I think you could do a normal title, on a white background instead of the dark blue background. Does that make sense?
Also, the table that is not in a mobile has a different treatment for the table headers than what is in the modal, if both will be used these should be consistent.
Thanks
Hi Kristen & Molly Ronovsky: I have created 3 options for the above functionality. Please have a look and provide your feedback.
CC: Samir Swapnil Pandhare Kristen ShashiKant Mishra Smita Pawar
Aruna Raheja
added a comment - Hi Kristen & Molly Ronovsky : I have created 3 options for the above functionality. Please have a look and provide your feedback.
CC: Samir Swapnil Pandhare Kristen ShashiKant Mishra Smita Pawar Aruna Raheja
I think i like the one with checkboxes and the tab. Looks cleaner, easier to manage.
Need to rename 'Person', probably should say Admin and then User
Need to accommodate non-mapped fields.
Also aren't we taking the candidate into consideration? Asked this question about but didn't hear anything. Example - offer letter - we would want user to possibly make updates, but candidate would need everything locked. Where as for a form, we might have fields editable if they want/need to update information.
Aruna Raheja Read only fields.png Looks the best to me
Samir: As requested, I have changed the checkboxes to Radio buttons.
Molly Ronovsky: I have added dummy Non-mapped fields, please check the attached mockup if it is good to go.
CC:Kristen
Aruna Raheja
added a comment - Samir : As requested, I have changed the checkboxes to Radio buttons.
Molly Ronovsky : I have added dummy Non-mapped fields, please check the attached mockup if it is good to go.
CC: Kristen Aruna Raheja Looks good
Molly Ronovsky: Should I close this ticket?
CC:Kristen
Aruna Raheja
added a comment - Molly Ronovsky : Should I close this ticket?
CC: Kristen Aruna Raheja yes
Samir : Design is finalized. Kindly implement
Aruna Raheja
added a comment - Samir : Design is finalized. Kindly implement 
Samir : Can you please share the screenshot on which we have discussed in the morning. Also define the final fields of permission, as per me it is "View only" and "Editable"
CC: Kristen Swapnil Pandhare