Details

    • Type: Sub-task
    • Status: Done
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Company:
      All Clients/Multiple Clients

      Description

      Read only fields implementation on Edit PDF

        Attachments

          Activity

          samir Samir created issue -
          samir Samir made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Assignee Samir [ samir ] Aruna Raheja [ aruna.raheja ]
          Hide
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment -

          Samir : Can you please share the screenshot on which we have discussed in the morning. Also define the final fields of permission, as per me it is "View only" and "Editable"

          CC: Kristen Swapnil Pandhare

          Show
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment - Samir : Can you please share the screenshot on which we have discussed in the morning. Also define the final fields of permission, as per me it is "View only" and "Editable" CC: Kristen Swapnil Pandhare
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Assignee Aruna Raheja [ aruna.raheja ] Samir [ samir ]
          swapnil.pandhare Swapnil Pandhare (Inactive) made changes -
          Hide
          swapnil.pandhare Swapnil Pandhare (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Aruna Raheja,

          Please refer attached screenshots.

          Thanks,
          Swapnil P.

          Show
          swapnil.pandhare Swapnil Pandhare (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Aruna Raheja , Please refer attached screenshots. Thanks, Swapnil P.
          samir Samir made changes -
          Attachment DMS-Admin & Person User Rights.png [ 97767 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja logged work - 11/Feb/19 07:20 AM
          • Time Spent:
            1h
             

            Research on the concept

          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Assignee Samir [ samir ] Aruna Raheja [ aruna.raheja ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Status To Do [ 10000 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Remaining Estimate 8h [ 28800 ]
          Original Estimate 8h [ 28800 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Remaining Estimate 8h [ 28800 ] 7h [ 25200 ]
          Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ]
          Worklog Id 160335 [ 160335 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja logged work - 12/Feb/19 03:15 AM
          • Time Spent:
            3h
             
            <No comment>
          Hide
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment -

          Hi Molly Ronovsky & Kristen: Please check the attached mockups and provide your feedback onto the same.

          CC:Samir Swapnil Pandhare

          Show
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment - Hi  Molly Ronovsky & Kristen : Please check the attached mockups and provide your feedback onto the same. CC: Samir Swapnil Pandhare
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Attachment Read only fields.png [ 97959 ]
          Attachment Read only fields1.png [ 97960 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Remaining Estimate 7h [ 25200 ] 4h [ 14400 ]
          Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ] 4h [ 14400 ]
          Worklog Id 160440 [ 160440 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Assignee Aruna Raheja [ aruna.raheja ] Molly Ronovsky [ molly.ronovsky ]
          Hide
          molly.ronovsky Molly Ronovsky (Inactive) added a comment -

          Aruna Raheja

          I like the idea of it being a pop-up on the same page vs. going to a new page; that way it's all done in one step/page.

          As mentioned on the call, we will need to accommodate non-mapped fields so that we can indicate settings on these, as well as well as you all were going to go back to discuss how to make the labels simpler for the user to understand what the check is for / should only check one box.

          One question I do have - are these rights for preview, candidate, or both? I'm just thinking a field might be editable by the admin when previewing but when it's sent, it should be view only to everyone (ie salary). Does that make sense? Not sure if we have accounted for the difference?

          CC: SamirSwapnil PandhareKristenShashiKant Mishra

          Show
          molly.ronovsky Molly Ronovsky (Inactive) added a comment - Aruna Raheja I like the idea of it being a pop-up on the same page vs. going to a new page; that way it's all done in one step/page. As mentioned on the call, we will need to accommodate non-mapped fields so that we can indicate settings on these, as well as well as you all were going to go back to discuss how to make the labels simpler for the user to understand what the check is for / should only check one box. One question I do have - are these rights for preview, candidate, or both? I'm just thinking a field might be editable by the admin when previewing but when it's sent, it should be view only to everyone (ie salary). Does that make sense? Not sure if we have accounted for the difference? CC: Samir Swapnil Pandhare Kristen ShashiKant Mishra
          molly.ronovsky Molly Ronovsky (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Molly Ronovsky [ molly.ronovsky ] Aruna Raheja [ aruna.raheja ]
          Hide
          Ruel Kristen (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Aruna Raheja Looking at the modal... the Dark blue background behind the title seems unnecessary. I think you could do a normal title, on a white background instead of the dark blue background. Does that make sense?
          Also, the table that is not in a mobile has a different treatment for the table headers than what is in the modal, if both will be used these should be consistent.
          Thanks

          Show
          Ruel Kristen (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Aruna Raheja Looking at the modal... the Dark blue background behind the title seems unnecessary. I think you could do a normal title, on a white background instead of the dark blue background. Does that make sense? Also, the table that is not in a mobile has a different treatment for the table headers than what is in the modal, if both will be used these should be consistent. Thanks
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja logged work - 20/Feb/19 08:47 PM
          • Time Spent:
            2h
             
            <No comment>
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Remaining Estimate 4h [ 14400 ] 2h [ 7200 ]
          Time Spent 4h [ 14400 ] 6h [ 21600 ]
          Worklog Id 162272 [ 162272 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Attachment Read only fields.png [ 97959 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Attachment Read only fields1.png [ 97960 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Attachment Read only fields.png [ 99074 ]
          Attachment Read only fields2.png [ 99075 ]
          Attachment Read only fields3.png [ 99076 ]
          Hide
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment -

          Hi Kristen & Molly Ronovsky: I have created 3 options for the above functionality. Please have a look and provide your feedback.

          CC: Samir Swapnil Pandhare Kristen ShashiKant Mishra Smita Pawar

          Show
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment - Hi  Kristen & Molly Ronovsky : I have created 3 options for the above functionality. Please have a look and provide your feedback. CC:  Samir   Swapnil Pandhare   Kristen   ShashiKant Mishra Smita Pawar
          Hide
          molly.ronovsky Molly Ronovsky (Inactive) added a comment -

          Aruna Raheja
          I think i like the one with checkboxes and the tab. Looks cleaner, easier to manage.
          Need to rename 'Person', probably should say Admin and then User
          Need to accommodate non-mapped fields.

          Also aren't we taking the candidate into consideration? Asked this question about but didn't hear anything. Example - offer letter - we would want user to possibly make updates, but candidate would need everything locked. Where as for a form, we might have fields editable if they want/need to update information.

          Kristen

          Show
          molly.ronovsky Molly Ronovsky (Inactive) added a comment - Aruna Raheja I think i like the one with checkboxes and the tab. Looks cleaner, easier to manage. Need to rename 'Person', probably should say Admin and then User Need to accommodate non-mapped fields. Also aren't we taking the candidate into consideration? Asked this question about but didn't hear anything. Example - offer letter - we would want user to possibly make updates, but candidate would need everything locked. Where as for a form, we might have fields editable if they want/need to update information. Kristen
          Hide
          Ruel Kristen (Inactive) added a comment -

          Aruna Raheja Read only fields.png Looks the best to me

          Show
          Ruel Kristen (Inactive) added a comment - Aruna Raheja Read only fields.png Looks the best to me
          Hide
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment -

          Samir: As requested, I have changed the checkboxes to Radio buttons.

          Molly Ronovsky: I have added dummy Non-mapped fields, please check the attached mockup if it is good to go.

          CC:Kristen

          Show
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment - Samir : As requested, I have changed the checkboxes to Radio buttons. Molly Ronovsky : I have added dummy Non-mapped fields, please check the attached mockup if it is good to go. CC: Kristen
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Attachment Read only fields.png [ 99074 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Attachment Read only fields.png [ 99213 ]
          Hide
          molly.ronovsky Molly Ronovsky (Inactive) added a comment -

          Aruna Raheja Looks good

          Show
          molly.ronovsky Molly Ronovsky (Inactive) added a comment - Aruna Raheja Looks good
          Hide
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment -

          Molly Ronovsky: Should I close this ticket?

          CC:Kristen

          Show
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment - Molly Ronovsky : Should I close this ticket? CC: Kristen
          Hide
          molly.ronovsky Molly Ronovsky (Inactive) added a comment -
          Show
          molly.ronovsky Molly Ronovsky (Inactive) added a comment - Aruna Raheja yes
          Hide
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment -

          Samir : Design is finalized. Kindly implement

          Show
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja added a comment - Samir : Design is finalized. Kindly implement
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
          Status In Progress [ 3 ] Done [ 10001 ]
          aruna.raheja Aruna Raheja made changes -
          Assignee Aruna Raheja [ aruna.raheja ] Samir [ samir ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Aruna Raheja made transition -
          To Do In Progress
          21h 30m 1
          Aruna Raheja made transition -
          In Progress Done
          14d 36m 1

            People

            Assignee:
            samir Samir
            Reporter:
            samir Samir
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

                Time Tracking

                Estimated:
                Original Estimate - 8h
                8h
                Remaining:
                Time Spent - 6h Remaining Estimate - 2h
                2h
                Logged:
                Time Spent - 6h Remaining Estimate - 2h
                6h