New Features 2017Project Type: software

New Features 2017

Uploaded image for project: 'New Features 2017'
  1. New Features 2017
  2. NF-2185

Azure - UIRefresh QA Test1 - SA Login - Tour Builder - Functional - Invalid values listed in Select Criteria field.

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: UI Refresh
    • Labels:
      None
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Level:
      Employee
    • Module:
      OnBoard
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Q2
    • Browser:
      IE 11, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox

      Description

      Azure - UIRefresh QA Test1 - SA Login

      In Tour Builder, while creating a new tour, on Define Eligibility Tab, in Select Criteria field, incorrect values are listed. PFA screen shot.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          is caused by

          New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. NF-877 Tour Builder - Define Eligibility (Admin)

          • Medium - Has the potential to affect progress.
          • Resolution Setting

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) created issue -
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue clones NF-2181 [ NF-2181 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Description Azure - UIRefresh QA Test1 - Employee Login

            During employee pre-board tour, Back button is displayed from first form. Server Error is produced on click of this button. PFA screen shots and Error log.

            Exception : Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the

            collection.Parameter name: index
            App Error Log : -
            Employee ID : 0
            Action Name : StartTourPreview
            Model : System.Web.Mvc.HandleErrorInfo
            Controller : Customization
            Web Error Log : at

            WORKTERRA.OnBoard.Areas.Customization.Models.DisplayTourModel.NavigatetoTourDisplayTour()
             at

            WORKTERRA.OnBoard.Areas.Customization.Controllers.CustomizationController.StartTourPreview()
             at lambda_method(Closure , ControllerBase , Object[] )
             at System.Web.Mvc.ReflectedActionDescriptor.Execute(ControllerContext controllerContext,

            IDictionary`2 parameters)
             at System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethod(ControllerContext

            controllerContext, ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor, IDictionary`2 parameters)
             at System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.b__39(IAsyncResult asyncResult,

            ActionInvocation innerInvokeState)
             at System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncResultWrapper.WrappedAsyncResult`2.CallEndDelegate(IAsyncResult

            asyncResult)
             at System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.AsyncInvocationWithFilters.b__3d()
             at

            System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.AsyncInvocationWithFilters.<>c__DisplayClass

            46.b__3f()
             at

            System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.AsyncInvocationWithFilters.<>c__DisplayClass

            46.b__3f()
             at System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.<>c__DisplayClass33.b__32(IAsyncResult

            asyncResult)
             at

            System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.<>c__DisplayClass21.<>c__DisplayClass2b.b__1

            c()
             at System.Web.Mvc.Async.AsyncControllerActionInvoker.<>c__DisplayClass21.b__1e(IAsyncResult

            asyncResult)             		Azure - UIRefresh QA Test1 - SA Login

            In Tour Builder, while creating a new tour, on Define Eligibility Tab, in Select Criteria field, incorrect values are listed. PFA screen shot.
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue clones NF-2181 [ NF-2181 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Define Eligibility-invalid values-Select Criteria field.png [ 49544 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is caused by NF-877 [ NF-877 ]
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) made changes -
            Component/s UI Refresh [ 10902 ]
            Component/s OnBoard [ 11200 ]
            vijayendra Vijayendra Shinde (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vijayendra Shinde [ ID10506 ] Pratap Patil [ pratap.patil ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            pratap.patil Pratap Patil (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello Swapnil Pandhare ,
            Please look into this.

            Thanks,
            Pratap

            CC: Vijayendra Shinde

            Show
            pratap.patil Pratap Patil (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Swapnil Pandhare , Please look into this. Thanks, Pratap CC: Vijayendra Shinde
            pratap.patil Pratap Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Pratap Patil [ pratap.patil ] Swapnil Pandhare [ swapnil.pandhare ]
            swapnil.pandhare Swapnil Pandhare (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Swapnil Pandhare [ swapnil.pandhare ] Sudhir Kalikate [ sudhir.kalikate ]
            sudhir.kalikate Sudhir Kalikate (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            swapnil.pandhare Swapnil Pandhare (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jaideep Vinchurkar ,
            CC: Satya
            There are few fields need to be removed from EligibilityCriteriaLookup.
            Those are exposed in generic eligility.
            Please schedule as per available bandwidth.

            THanks,
            Swapnil P.

            Show
            swapnil.pandhare Swapnil Pandhare (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jaideep Vinchurkar , CC: Satya There are few fields need to be removed from EligibilityCriteriaLookup. Those are exposed in generic eligility. Please schedule as per available bandwidth. THanks, Swapnil P.
            swapnil.pandhare Swapnil Pandhare (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Sudhir Kalikate [ sudhir.kalikate ] Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ]
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Bug Severity Medium [ 16702 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Estimates 8
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 04/Aug/2017
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Hide
            Permalink
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Rajendra Joshi ,

            As per screen shot provided , its seems like a old eligibility rules screen and currently we are using generic eligibility rules.

            Can you please confirm ?

            Thanks !

            CC :Jaideep Vinchurkar

            Show
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Rajendra Joshi , As per screen shot provided , its seems like a old eligibility rules screen and currently we are using generic eligibility rules. Can you please confirm ? Thanks ! CC : Jaideep Vinchurkar
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Rajendra Joshi [ rajendraj ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on Azure using company Long for HSPL. Above issue has got resolved during generic eligibility enhancement NF-4029. Hence closing this JIRA.

            Show
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Azure using company Long for HSPL. Above issue has got resolved during generic eligibility enhancement NF-4029 . Hence closing this JIRA.
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Azure-done.png [ 58187 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Browser Google Chrome [ 16306 ] IE 11,Mozilla Firefox,Google Chrome [ 16304, 16305, 16306 ]
            Remaining Estimate 1h [ 3600 ]
            Original Estimate 1h [ 3600 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 1h [ 3600 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ]
            Worklog Id 70711 [ 70711 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ] 0.25h [ 900 ]
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ] 0.75h [ 2700 ]
            Worklog Id 70711 [ 70711 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            Permalink
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 10/Aug/17 01:20 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               
              <No comment>
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0.25h [ 900 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 0.75h [ 2700 ] 1.75h [ 6300 ]
            Worklog Id 70914 [ 70914 ]
            Permalink
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) logged work - 11/Aug/17 06:55 AM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              0.75h
               

              Discussion with developer, verification Azure using different companies.

            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Sudhir Kalikate (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            		23d 3h 20m 1
            Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Reopen in Local
            		16d 19h 5m 1
            Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made transition -
            Reopen in Local In Development
            		3s 1
            Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            		34d 23h 35m 2
            Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            		38s 1
            Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            		6s 1
            Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            		48s 1
            Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            		4s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive)
              QA:
              Rajendra Joshi (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 1h Original Estimate - 1h
                  1h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 1.75h
                  1.75h