-
Type:
Support Activity
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Resolution: Done
-
Labels:None
-
Support Task Type:ACA IRS Report
-
Environment:Production
-
Company:Mesquite Gaming
-
Categories:ACA
-
Reported by:Client
- clones
-
-
- Closed
-
Hi Jennifer Leugers,
This group has been run.Please refer latest run dated "12/13/2017 11:20:32 PM" for verification.
Observation: Measurement and stability rules are set and as timesheet data till 12th Nov,2017 is also present, so we are considering timesheet data for to determine whether employee is part time or full time. Please update the timesheet data for whole year of 2017.I n case if timesheet data is not to be considered,please let us know.
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
This group has been run.Please refer latest run dated "12/13/2017 11:20:32 PM" for verification.
Observation : Measurement and stability rules are set and as timesheet data till 12th Nov,2017 is also present, so we are considering timesheet data for to determine whether employee is part time or full time. Please update the timesheet data for whole year of 2017.I n case if timesheet data is not to be considered,please let us know. Changed to at least MEC offered to dependent(s); and at least MEC conditionally offered to spouse. Please re-run their forms. Thanks!
We have run Casa Blanca 1095C report on Mesquite Gaming.
Please refer run '1/2/2018 1:40:29 AM' to download.
PFA QA verification list.
Thanks!!
Hi all - Mesquite has some questions on their overall groups (there are three EINs). The first person they are questioning is Ana Abarca and I cannot understand her codes per the history of this employee. Also, they are saying that their reason for not sending the time and attendance for December 2017 is because their part time and Extra Board members measurement for eligibility is based on the hours in 2016 so the 2017 hours shouldn’t be affecting any of the reporting. She thinks we are very wrong and need to make sure the coding is looking at last year’s hours (2016) instead of 2017.
Also - there are some employees that have multiple lines (example Josue Barraza with Casa Blanca is showing two lines for October & November).
Hi Jennifer Leugers,
Please find my analysis of the employee Ana Abarca:
This Employee's EIN is changed due to class change.So She will have two 1095C's.One from Virgin River and other from Casa Blanca.
Virgin river 1095C :
She was hired in December,2016.So she was in limited assessment period in Jan,2017 month.Her Class 2 was Virgin River when she was hired and she was not eligible for any plan till April.
Hence 1H was displayed for the month of Feb and March.She had offer from April and so appropriate codes got displayed.
She was not present in this EIN for later months hence 1H-2A is displayed.
Casa Blanca 1095C :
Employee was not in this EIN till March.Hence 1H-2A is displayed.From April to Oct,This employee got codes as per system data and in Oct she was terminated.Hence for later months,1H-2A is displayed.
In-case if you feel that these codes need to be corrected,it can be done through code correction.Codes as per the EIN need to be imported or manually corrected.Changes will be reflected in next run.
TimeSheet data:
The observation in my earlier comment was just initial analysis of measurement and stability rules and timesheet present in the system. We require 2016 hours data for 2017 stability period.Looking at the time sheet data present there are some periods for which timesheet is missing. The periods are 04/18/2016 - 04/30/2016,08/22/2016 - 09/04/2016,11/28/2016 - 12/25/2016.
Please load the timesheets of periods mentioned.
Employees with Multiple lines : This does occur for some of the employees,but this does not affect any codes nor it is updated anywhere in the system. Even if two records are shown their codes are same.This comes only in analysis report.1095C Reports are not affected by this.
We have added this in our learning(WT-12408) and will analyze it further after the execution.
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
Please find my analysis of the employee Ana Abarca :
This Employee's EIN is changed due to class change.So She will have two 1095C's.One from Virgin River and other from Casa Blanca.
Virgin river 1095C :
She was hired in December,2016.So she was in limited assessment period in Jan,2017 month.Her Class 2 was Virgin River when she was hired and she was not eligible for any plan till April.
Hence 1H was displayed for the month of Feb and March.She had offer from April and so appropriate codes got displayed.
She was not present in this EIN for later months hence 1H-2A is displayed.
Casa Blanca 1095C :
Employee was not in this EIN till March.Hence 1H-2A is displayed.From April to Oct,This employee got codes as per system data and in Oct she was terminated.Hence for later months,1H-2A is displayed.
In-case if you feel that these codes need to be corrected,it can be done through code correction.Codes as per the EIN need to be imported or manually corrected.Changes will be reflected in next run.
TimeSheet data:
The observation in my earlier comment was just initial analysis of measurement and stability rules and timesheet present in the system. We require 2016 hours data for 2017 stability period.Looking at the time sheet data present there are some periods for which timesheet is missing. The periods are 04/18/2016 - 04/30/2016,08/22/2016 - 09/04/2016,11/28/2016 - 12/25/2016.
Please load the timesheets of periods mentioned.
Employees with Multiple lines : This does occur for some of the employees,but this does not affect any codes nor it is updated anywhere in the system . Even if two records are shown their codes are same.This comes only in analysis report.1095C Reports are not affected by this.
We have added this in our learning( WT-12408 ) and will analyze it further after the execution. For Ana Abarca, why are we showing a 1H / blank for February and March? Shouldn't it be 1H/2D?
Hi Jennifer Leugers,
Ana Abarca was employed on 12/01/2016. As per the New hire rules set on the company,she was eligible to enroll for benefits effective 02/01/2017.But she was not eligible to any medical plans in Feb and March month. So 1H is populated which depicts that there is no offer.
She was in limited Assessment period till Jan,2017.Hence 1H/2D is shown only for Jan Month.
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
Ana Abarca was employed on 12/01/2016. As per the New hire rules set on the company,she was eligible to enroll for benefits effective 02/01/2017.But she was not eligible to any medical plans in Feb and March month. So 1H is populated which depicts that there is no offer.
She was in limited Assessment period till Jan,2017.Hence 1H/2D is shown only for Jan Month. Hi all - client has uploaded hours for December. Please re-run forms. Thanks!
Hi Jennifer Leugers,
To get stability in year 2017, we need to upload time sheets for year 2016.
We observed time sheet data is uploaded for Dec 2017 in the system.
Please upload time sheet data as mentioned in previous comment.
Adding previous comment by Ramya again.
'Looking at the time sheet data present there are some periods
for which timesheet is missing. The periods are 04/18/2016 - 04/30/2016,08/22/2016 - 09/04/2016, 11/28/2016 - 12/25/2016'.
Thanks!
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - - edited Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
To get stability in year 2017, we need to upload time sheets for year 2016.
We observed time sheet data is uploaded for Dec 2017 in the system.
Please upload time sheet data as mentioned in previous comment.
Adding previous comment by Ramya again.
'Looking at the time sheet data present there are some periods
for which timesheet is missing. The periods are 04/18/2016 - 04/30/2016,08/22/2016 - 09/04/2016, 11/28/2016 - 12/25/2016'.
Thanks! HI all - the timesheets have been loaded, I removed the conditional offer on the customization and entered some code corrections from the UI. Please re-run these forms. Thanks!
Hi Jennifer Leugers,
This group has been run by applying user correction. Please download latest run as per below reports for verification.
| Report Name | Run details | Remark |
|---|---|---|
| Casa Blanca 1095C | 1/16/2018 10:43:44 AM | In this run, two employees are less(MARIA E. DELGADO HERMOSILLO,MARIA F ROMERO) by comparison with run date 1/16/2018 1:04:12 AM CAROL WHITEHURST- This employee's codes are reflected as 1K and 2B for 9 months. Please do the corrections. |
Thanks,
Revan
Hi there - I corrected Whitehurst. Please re-run. Thanks!
Hi Jennifer Leugers,
This group has been run by applying user correction. Please download latest run as per below reports for verification.
| Report Name | Run details | Remark |
|---|---|---|
| Casa Blanca 1095C | 1/16/2018 11:42:56 AM | Now there is no one records of code as 1K & 2B but two employees are not found (MARIA E. DELGADO HERMOSILLO,MARIA F ROMERO) by comparison with previous run date 1/16/2018 1:04:12 AM |
Thanks,
Revan
Closing this ticket
Casa Blanca 1095C is ready to run. Thanks!