Details

    • Type: Support Activity
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Labels:
      None
    • Support Task Type:
      ACA IRS Report
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Company:
      JE Dunn
    • Categories:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Client

      Description

      NA

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) created issue -
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue clones WT-12484 [ WT-12484 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Company All Clients/Multiple Clients [ 18434 ] JE Dunn [ 10476 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Description All companies are linked to this Jira which will get processed for IRS submission in year 2018
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Account Executive Tracy Kot [ tkot ]
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Please provide the data sheet for capturing COBRA enrollments for those that are not currently housed in WORKTERRA. We need to add them in so they receive a 1095C. Please also run the 2017 JE DUNN 1095C REPORT as it is ready.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Please provide the data sheet for capturing COBRA enrollments for those that are not currently housed in WORKTERRA. We need to add them in so they receive a 1095C. Please also run the 2017 JE DUNN 1095C REPORT as it is ready.
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
            Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 08/Dec/17 08:31 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.75h
               

              Analysis and discussion with Smita

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 0.75h [ 2700 ]
            Worklog Id 95270 [ 95270 ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WORKTERRA ACAMP IRS Reporting Specifications for Data Files Edited LK-o... (1).xls [ 69669 ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WORKTERRA ACAMP IRS Reporting Specifications for Data Files Edited LK-o... (1).xls [ 69669 ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Hide
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            As per process set by Amit to load any data like enrollments, employee data etc into the system, should be processed by EDI team. So requesting you to please create a separate ticket for the same and assign to EDI.

            If any ACA related code correction that is for 1095c Part -2,Part-3, please let us know by providing the data in our specification file. We will do it.

            Data sheet to capture enrollment - WORKTERRA ACAMP IRS Reporting Specifications for Data Files Edited.xls
            ACA 1095 C correction template- ACA1095CCorrectionImportTemplate.xls

            Thanks,
            Revan
            CC- Amit Thorve, Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar, Ramya Tantry, Kumar Chhajed, Smita Pawar, Sachin Hingole

            Show
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , As per process set by Amit to load any data like enrollments, employee data etc into the system, should be processed by EDI team. So requesting you to please create a separate ticket for the same and assign to EDI. If any ACA related code correction that is for 1095c Part -2,Part-3, please let us know by providing the data in our specification file. We will do it. Data sheet to capture enrollment - WORKTERRA ACAMP IRS Reporting Specifications for Data Files Edited.xls ACA 1095 C correction template- ACA1095CCorrectionImportTemplate.xls Thanks, Revan CC- Amit Thorve , Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Ramya Tantry , Kumar Chhajed , Smita Pawar , Sachin Hingole
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 0.75h [ 2700 ] 4.75h [ 17100 ]
            Worklog Id 95371 [ 95371 ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) logged work - 08/Dec/17 10:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Internal discussion,Jira comments go through (WT-6307) & replied to the current Jira.

            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all -

            I have some changes that need to be done on the JE Dunn forms -

            They have a lot of Union employees so for any months in which they are employed, I would assume we would want to see a 1H / 2E. I believe we can do this class by class but I do not see how to do that from the User Interface as I only see that ability by plan. The classes that need to have the Multi-Employer code are the Union classes listed below -
            ASRU Asst Supt - Rated - Union Regular
            ASUN Asst Supt - Union Regular
            FHRU Field Temporary Union Temporary
            FSNSU - Field Superv Non St Hourly Union
            FSTU Field Straight Time Union Regular
            GSUN General Supt Union Regular
            SUUN Sr Supts & Supts Union Regular

            For all classes besides FHRN, FSNSN and the groups above, the lowest cost plan with the tobacco credit is $60.00 so we need those classes codes to 1A -
            ASNU Asst Supt
            ASRN Asst Supt - Rated - Non Union Regular
            CCO
            FSTN Field Straight Time Non Union
            GSNU General Supt Non Union
            OFAD
            OFCR
            ONEX
            OPRF
            RJLN
            RJLX
            RJNX
            SUNU

            For FHRN and FSNSN, I would expect them to remain at 1E since they are not eligible for the tobacco credit of $50.

            Another question, why are some of the non-union employees showing as 1H / blank?

            If you could please have these changes done tonight so I can give them to the client tomorrow, I would greatly appreciate it!

            Thanks!
            Jen

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - I have some changes that need to be done on the JE Dunn forms - They have a lot of Union employees so for any months in which they are employed, I would assume we would want to see a 1H / 2E. I believe we can do this class by class but I do not see how to do that from the User Interface as I only see that ability by plan. The classes that need to have the Multi-Employer code are the Union classes listed below - ASRU Asst Supt - Rated - Union Regular ASUN Asst Supt - Union Regular FHRU Field Temporary Union Temporary FSNSU - Field Superv Non St Hourly Union FSTU Field Straight Time Union Regular GSUN General Supt Union Regular SUUN Sr Supts & Supts Union Regular For all classes besides FHRN, FSNSN and the groups above, the lowest cost plan with the tobacco credit is $60.00 so we need those classes codes to 1A - ASNU Asst Supt ASRN Asst Supt - Rated - Non Union Regular CCO FSTN Field Straight Time Non Union GSNU General Supt Non Union OFAD OFCR ONEX OPRF RJLN RJLX RJNX SUNU For FHRN and FSNSN, I would expect them to remain at 1E since they are not eligible for the tobacco credit of $50. Another question, why are some of the non-union employees showing as 1H / blank? If you could please have these changes done tonight so I can give them to the client tomorrow, I would greatly appreciate it! Thanks! Jen
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
            Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 06/Feb/18 07:49 AM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Analysis
              Rule creation
              report run
              verification and sampling
              draft reply

            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            For union employees,we have created a new eligibility rule named "Union classes" which contains all the union classes mentioned in your comment.
            We have created another rule named "Low Cost Plan" which contains all classes mentioned for 1A in your comment.
            In ACA Customization page->ACA_1095C Classwise Configuration tab,we have set these rules with appropriate codes for 01/01/2017 - 12/31/2017.
            For Union classes rules codes set are 1H/2E and for Low Cost Plan codes set are 1A with cost as $60.

            We have re-run report by marking Apply Class wise configuration flag on report as yes.
            Please refer latest run dated "2/5/2018 11:27:46 PM" for verification.

            We have spot checked some of the employees of each group:
            1. Union classes :
            Scott D Bishop : 1H/2E
            Jason G Estes : 1H/2E

            2. Low cost plan
            John F Scammacca : 1A/2C
            Nicholas C Woodard : 1A/2C

            3. FHRN and FSNSN classes
            Israel A Davila : Jan-Aug : 1E/2F, Sept : 1H/2B, Oct-Dec : 1H/2A
            Isiah J House : 1E/2C

            4. why are some of the non-union employees showing as 1H / blank?
            These employees do not have offers.Hence they are coming up as blank.
            Hunter M Hill : Hired in Aug. No offer from Sept to Nov.Got offer from mid Dec after class change.But as offer is not present for whole month,1H is shown for Dec.
            Jacob H Lansford : Hired in May.No offer from June-Dec.

            NOTE: There are some discrepancy related to member SSN and MEC indicator for June month is coming up as NO.

            CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Revansiddha Gaur,Smita Pawar

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , For union employees,we have created a new eligibility rule named "Union classes" which contains all the union classes mentioned in your comment. We have created another rule named "Low Cost Plan" which contains all classes mentioned for 1A in your comment. In ACA Customization page->ACA_1095C Classwise Configuration tab ,we have set these rules with appropriate codes for 01/01/2017 - 12/31/2017. For Union classes rules codes set are 1H/2E and for Low Cost Plan codes set are 1A with cost as $60 . We have re-run report by marking Apply Class wise configuration flag on report as yes . Please refer latest run dated " 2/5/2018 11:27:46 PM " for verification. We have spot checked some of the employees of each group: 1. Union classes : Scott D Bishop : 1H/2E Jason G Estes : 1H/2E 2. Low cost plan John F Scammacca : 1A/2C Nicholas C Woodard : 1A/2C 3. FHRN and FSNSN classes Israel A Davila : Jan-Aug : 1E/2F, Sept : 1H/2B, Oct-Dec : 1H/2A Isiah J House : 1E/2C 4. why are some of the non-union employees showing as 1H / blank? These employees do not have offers.Hence they are coming up as blank. Hunter M Hill : Hired in Aug. No offer from Sept to Nov.Got offer from mid Dec after class change.But as offer is not present for whole month,1H is shown for Dec. Jacob H Lansford : Hired in May.No offer from June-Dec. NOTE : There are some discrepancy related to member SSN and MEC indicator for June month is coming up as NO. CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Revansiddha Gaur , Smita Pawar
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 4.75h [ 17100 ] 8.75h [ 31500 ]
            Worklog Id 103513 [ 103513 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Open [ 1 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - thanks for making all of those changes. The client has additional changes however in regards to their safe harbors. For those who had the default of $60.00, they want to use the FPL safe harbor. For the other two, they want to use Rate of Pay.

            FPL
            ASNU Asst Supt
            ASRN Asst Supt - Rated - Non Union Regular
            CCO
            FSTN Field Straight Time Non Union
            GSNU General Supt Non Union
            OFAD
            OFCR
            ONEX
            OPRF
            RJLN
            RJLX
            RJNX
            SUNU

            Rate of Pay
            FHRN and FSNSN

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - thanks for making all of those changes. The client has additional changes however in regards to their safe harbors. For those who had the default of $60.00, they want to use the FPL safe harbor. For the other two, they want to use Rate of Pay. FPL ASNU Asst Supt ASRN Asst Supt - Rated - Non Union Regular CCO FSTN Field Straight Time Non Union GSNU General Supt Non Union OFAD OFCR ONEX OPRF RJLN RJLX RJNX SUNU Rate of Pay FHRN and FSNSN
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
            Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            We have rerun report 2017 JE DUNN 1095C REPORT after doing changes in customization.

            Changes done in customization are as follows
            1.Changed safe harbor from 'W2' to 'Rate of Pay' on ACA customization screen for all medical plans.
            2.On 'ACA 1095C class Wise Configuration' screen added Line 16 code to 2G for 'Low Cost Plan' eligibility rule.

            Please refer latest run '2/7/2018 3:43:40 AM' to download the report.

            Tested scenarios which are as follows.
            1.Verified Valid codes are reflecting on report.
            2.Verifed MEC Indicator is marked as 'NO' for the month of June and for rest of the year is as 'YES'.
            3.Verified from data anlysis report 1A-2G and 1E -2H codes are reflecting on report.

            Thanks,
            Smita

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , We have rerun report 2017 JE DUNN 1095C REPORT after doing changes in customization. Changes done in customization are as follows 1.Changed safe harbor from 'W2' to 'Rate of Pay' on ACA customization screen for all medical plans. 2.On 'ACA 1095C class Wise Configuration' screen added Line 16 code to 2G for 'Low Cost Plan' eligibility rule. Please refer latest run '2/7/2018 3:43:40 AM' to download the report. Tested scenarios which are as follows. 1.Verified Valid codes are reflecting on report. 2.Verifed MEC Indicator is marked as 'NO' for the month of June and for rest of the year is as 'YES'. 3.Verified from data anlysis report 1A-2G and 1E -2H codes are reflecting on report. Thanks, Smita
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) logged work - 07/Feb/18 12:54 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Internal discussion
              Draft
              Jira updates
              Customization changes
              report rerun

            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Open [ 1 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 8.75h [ 31500 ] 10.75h [ 38700 ]
            Worklog Id 103732 [ 103732 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ]
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - could you explain why Joseph Frye is showing a 2B in the month of December? Same question for Solomon Beckett, Juan Cardenas, etc. They don't fit the description as to what you were telling me about 2B so trying to figure out why they are getting that code. There are about 30 of them that have 1E / 2B. There are also a ton of records that have a 1H / blank in line 16 but I cannot understand as to why (Alec Arand is an example). If this could please be reviewed on priority tonight so I have a chance to review and respond back, that would be great. The client is anxious to get this done and I don't want to lose another day if I have questions.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - could you explain why Joseph Frye is showing a 2B in the month of December? Same question for Solomon Beckett, Juan Cardenas, etc. They don't fit the description as to what you were telling me about 2B so trying to figure out why they are getting that code. There are about 30 of them that have 1E / 2B. There are also a ton of records that have a 1H / blank in line 16 but I cannot understand as to why (Alec Arand is an example). If this could please be reviewed on priority tonight so I have a chance to review and respond back, that would be great. The client is anxious to get this done and I don't want to lose another day if I have questions.
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
            Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            Employee Joseph Faye got terminated on 1st Dec 2017 and we have observed that in case if termination happens on 1st date of the month,2B is displayed in that month. We have added this in our learning and will analyze it further.
            However, for now, we have made changes to show 1H/2A if termination happens on 1st day of the month.
            Please refer latest run dated "2/13/2018 10:14:49 PM" for further verification.
            In latest run,there are no 1E/2B code combination.

            For employees having 1H/Blank, I have already mentioned in my earlier comment that employees who do not have any ACA offer are getting 1H/Blank.Most of these employees fall in class "OBNI Office Benefit Ineligible Temporary".
            Some of the employee are hired mid year,so till date of hire they get 1H/2A,for the month of hire,1H/2D and later months 1H/Blank as they do not have any offers. If they get offers for some later months then codes are reflected appropriately.

            NOTE: There are some discrepancy related to member SSN and MEC indicator for June month is coming up as NO.

            CC:Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Smita Pawar,Revansiddha Gaur

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , Employee Joseph Faye got terminated on 1st Dec 2017 and we have observed that in case if termination happens on 1st date of the month,2B is displayed in that month. We have added this in our learning and will analyze it further. However, for now, we have made changes to show 1H/2A if termination happens on 1st day of the month. Please refer latest run dated "2/13/2018 10:14:49 PM" for further verification. In latest run,there are no 1E/2B code combination. For employees having 1H/Blank, I have already mentioned in my earlier comment that employees who do not have any ACA offer are getting 1H/Blank.Most of these employees fall in class "OBNI Office Benefit Ineligible Temporary". Some of the employee are hired mid year,so till date of hire they get 1H/2A,for the month of hire,1H/2D and later months 1H/Blank as they do not have any offers. If they get offers for some later months then codes are reflected appropriately. NOTE : There are some discrepancy related to member SSN and MEC indicator for June month is coming up as NO. CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Smita Pawar , Revansiddha Gaur
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Open [ 1 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 14/Feb/18 07:28 AM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Analysis
              Code changes
              report re-run
              verification
              draft reply

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 10.75h [ 38700 ] 14.75h [ 53100 ]
            Worklog Id 104519 [ 104519 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - could you please look at the client's comments below and advise as an overall process if there is anything we can do as well as specifically these two individuals?

            Coding for our new-hire and re-hire union employees seems off based on the couple of people we sampled. For example, Peter Wilczynski #28502 who was hired 3/27/17 and put on layoff 9/27/17 (which essentially counts as a term with Workterra) and has always been FHRU (Field Hourly Union). I think his coding should be: 1H / 2A for the months prior to hire, and then 1H / 2E for the months he was a union employee at JE Dunn, then back to 1H / 2A for the months after he left. But his actual coding is:

            1H / 2A for Jan and Feb – Correct, because he was not employed until March

            1H / 2D March (hire month) – there is no assessment period to become eligible since union employees are NEVER eligible for JE Dunn’s medical coverage

            1H / 2A April – he was employed in April, so this wrong

            1H / 2D again in May – again, there is no assessment period to become eligible since union employees are NEVER eligible for JE Dunn’s medical coverage

            1H / 2E (June-August) - Correct

            1H / 2B Sept – he was employed the month of September, and I think this should be coded as 1H / 2E

            1H / 2A October-December – Correct, because he “termed” on 9/27

            We found a similar pattern when looking at another union employee, Mat Fox.

            To reiterate, for union employees, who are always union during the year, I think the coding should be:

            1H / 2A if not employed, and 1H / 2E during months of employment with JE Dunn when their medical insurance benefits would have come from the multiemployer (union) plan.

            What can you do to clean up the coding for union employees like Peter and Mat who were hired/re-hired during 2017?

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - could you please look at the client's comments below and advise as an overall process if there is anything we can do as well as specifically these two individuals? Coding for our new-hire and re-hire union employees seems off based on the couple of people we sampled. For example, Peter Wilczynski #28502 who was hired 3/27/17 and put on layoff 9/27/17 (which essentially counts as a term with Workterra) and has always been FHRU (Field Hourly Union). I think his coding should be: 1H / 2A for the months prior to hire, and then 1H / 2E for the months he was a union employee at JE Dunn, then back to 1H / 2A for the months after he left. But his actual coding is: 1H / 2A for Jan and Feb – Correct, because he was not employed until March 1H / 2D March (hire month) – there is no assessment period to become eligible since union employees are NEVER eligible for JE Dunn’s medical coverage 1H / 2A April – he was employed in April, so this wrong 1H / 2D again in May – again, there is no assessment period to become eligible since union employees are NEVER eligible for JE Dunn’s medical coverage 1H / 2E (June-August) - Correct 1H / 2B Sept – he was employed the month of September, and I think this should be coded as 1H / 2E 1H / 2A October-December – Correct, because he “termed” on 9/27 We found a similar pattern when looking at another union employee, Mat Fox. To reiterate, for union employees, who are always union during the year, I think the coding should be: 1H / 2A if not employed, and 1H / 2E during months of employment with JE Dunn when their medical insurance benefits would have come from the multiemployer (union) plan. What can you do to clean up the coding for union employees like Peter and Mat who were hired/re-hired during 2017?
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
            Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            We made some changes in the back-end to accommodate client's request,for showing the codes 1H / 2A if not employed, and 1H / 2E during months of employment with JE Dunn when their medical insurance benefits would have come from the multi-employer (union) plan.

            However, these changes satisfies client request to some extent.
            For new hire employee : Peter Wilczynski
            1H-2D will still be displayed for hire month as he is hired on 03/27/2017.
            For providing 1H/2E we check on month start date if the employee is eligible.Since this employee is not eligible for March month,1H/2E will not be displayed in hire month.
            This is true for all union employees who are new hire.

            However for this employee,there was mismatch between employment date and effective date/status change change.
            This EE's employment date is 03/27/2017,but status change date/effective date is 04/03/2017.As we consider status change date for verification of whole month employment of an employee,due to data mismatch this employee shows 1H/2A for April month.Since system data cannot be changed,we have made correction for this employee through UI.
            In case if there are more employees having such scenarios,those need to be corrected through import.

            For Re-hire Employee : Mat Fox
            1H-2D will not be displayed in re-hire month as we have allowed 1H/2E to overwrite 1H/2D from backend.
            As this employee is re-hire,he is eligible for 1H/2E for whole year irrespective of his employee status. i.e even when employee was terminated,he belonged to union rule.So he satisfies union rule for whole year.

            We have re-run the report.Please refer latest run for verification.

            We would also like to have an input from you regarding 1H/2E question asked below so that we can analyze and implement the same for next year execution.
            Should new hire/re-hire union employee be displayed with 1H/2D for hire month?

            Note: There are Member SSN discrepancy.Please get them corrected before IRS submission.

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , We made some changes in the back-end to accommodate client's request,for showing the codes 1H / 2A if not employed, and 1H / 2E during months of employment with JE Dunn when their medical insurance benefits would have come from the multi-employer (union) plan. However, these changes satisfies client request to some extent. For new hire employee : Peter Wilczynski 1H-2D will still be displayed for hire month as he is hired on 03/27/2017. For providing 1H/2E we check on month start date if the employee is eligible.Since this employee is not eligible for March month,1H/2E will not be displayed in hire month. This is true for all union employees who are new hire. However for this employee,there was mismatch between employment date and effective date/status change change . This EE's employment date is 03/27/2017,but status change date/effective date is 04/03/2017.As we consider status change date for verification of whole month employment of an employee,due to data mismatch this employee shows 1H/2A for April month.Since system data cannot be changed,we have made correction for this employee through UI. In case if there are more employees having such scenarios,those need to be corrected through import. For Re-hire Employee : Mat Fox 1H-2D will not be displayed in re-hire month as we have allowed 1H/2E to overwrite 1H/2D from backend. As this employee is re-hire,he is eligible for 1H/2E for whole year irrespective of his employee status. i.e even when employee was terminated,he belonged to union rule.So he satisfies union rule for whole year. We have re-run the report.Please refer latest run for verification. We would also like to have an input from you regarding 1H/2E question asked below so that we can analyze and implement the same for next year execution. Should new hire/re-hire union employee be displayed with 1H/2D for hire month? Note : There are Member SSN discrepancy.Please get them corrected before IRS submission.
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Open [ 1 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 20/Feb/18 12:40 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2.5h
               

              analysis and discussion
              report run and verification
              draft reply

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 14.75h [ 53100 ] 17.25h [ 62100 ]
            Worklog Id 105346 [ 105346 ]
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - unfortunately this client has rules based on classes and it is not showing as such through the new hire / rehire rules and our analysis only shows the employees current class. Is there anyway to get this same report and have it show the class they were in the month not as of today? This isn't the first client to request this so I wonder if that is something we can think about adding next year but this is a big issue for this client. Please advise.

            Andrea Dennis FYI

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - unfortunately this client has rules based on classes and it is not showing as such through the new hire / rehire rules and our analysis only shows the employees current class. Is there anyway to get this same report and have it show the class they were in the month not as of today? This isn't the first client to request this so I wonder if that is something we can think about adding next year but this is a big issue for this client. Please advise. Andrea Dennis FYI
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            We have made changes from back-end and generated analysis report with Employee classes that was there in the month and not today. We have checked whether the employee is present in the class or no on month end date so that latest class can be displayed for that month.
            If an employee is new hire mid year,then class1 will be shown as - (dash) for the months he was not in company.
            We have uploaded this analysis report on FTP.
            Path: /users/workterraaca/_Tax Year 2017/JE Dunn

            We have reverted these changes.

            We have added this in our learning and will work on it after ACA Execution.

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , We have made changes from back-end and generated analysis report with Employee classes that was there in the month and not today. We have checked whether the employee is present in the class or no on month end date so that latest class can be displayed for that month. If an employee is new hire mid year,then class1 will be shown as - (dash) for the months he was not in company. We have uploaded this analysis report on FTP. Path : /users/workterraaca/_Tax Year 2017/JE Dunn We have reverted these changes. We have added this in our learning and will work on it after ACA Execution.
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 21/Feb/18 11:15 AM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Analysis and discussion with Nandkumar
              Analysis report coding for classwise employee report
              analysis report generation and download
              verification and upload to FTP
              draft reply.

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 17.25h [ 62100 ] 21.25h [ 76500 ]
            Worklog Id 105430 [ 105430 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - I'm asking for some assistance in loading the correction file for Je Dunn to the back end work you all did as well as the corrections that need to occur. From row 444 in the attached to row 623, those individuals are currently coded as 1G so I need to make sure those codes are changed (along with all others). I also need to make sure there is a form for Kevin Dunn (he should be a 1G for all 12 months). He's on the attached on row 624. File is ACA 1095C Correction Import Template 022618.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - I'm asking for some assistance in loading the correction file for Je Dunn to the back end work you all did as well as the corrections that need to occur. From row 444 in the attached to row 623, those individuals are currently coded as 1G so I need to make sure those codes are changed (along with all others). I also need to make sure there is a form for Kevin Dunn (he should be a 1G for all 12 months). He's on the attached on row 624. File is ACA 1095C Correction Import Template 022618.
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
            Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            As an FYI - this should be the last set of forms we have to run for this year!

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - As an FYI - this should be the last set of forms we have to run for this year!
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] On Hold [ 10507 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 27/Feb/18 10:03 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Discussion with Smita

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 21.25h [ 76500 ] 21.75h [ 78300 ]
            Worklog Id 106422 [ 106422 ]
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            We have rerun '2017 JE DUNN 1095C REPORT'.
            Please refer latest run '2/27/2018 2:02:28 AM' to download file.
            We have verified 1095-C pdf of employee 'Kevin Dunn' and code 1G is reflecting on his form for all 12 month.

            Tested scenarios are as follows.

            1.Verified all valid codes are reflecting on file.
            2.MEC Indicator is marked as YES for all 12 months.
            3.Tested sample employees are as follows.
            Acosta Ivan
            Burton Farris
            Armando Posada
            Nicholas Marquez
            Kevin Dunn

            Let us know, if you need any other additional information.

            Thanks!

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , We have rerun '2017 JE DUNN 1095C REPORT'. Please refer latest run '2/27/2018 2:02:28 AM' to download file. We have verified 1095-C pdf of employee 'Kevin Dunn' and code 1G is reflecting on his form for all 12 month. Tested scenarios are as follows. 1.Verified all valid codes are reflecting on file. 2.MEC Indicator is marked as YES for all 12 months. 3.Tested sample employees are as follows. Acosta Ivan Burton Farris Armando Posada Nicholas Marquez Kevin Dunn Let us know, if you need any other additional information. Thanks!
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status On Hold [ 10507 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) logged work - 27/Feb/18 10:41 AM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Analysis
              Code correction import
              Internal discussion with Ramya
              Verification
              Draft
              Jira updates

            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Open [ 1 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 21.75h [ 78300 ] 25.75h [ 92700 ]
            Worklog Id 106434 [ 106434 ]
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - the attached spreadsheet are COBRA enrollments that need forms (they will all be 1H / 2A for lines 14 & 16 but they do need forms and the coverages checked within the attached). This is another item I wish we could do from the UI (creating forms for the 1H/2A COBRA enrollments). Please update each of these forms and make sure their Part IIIs are correct. Once confirmed, please finalize and run the consolidated forms as well. Please please please make sure they are showing correctly and that none of our other changes from my changes yesterday changed when you change these folks. Thanks!

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - the attached spreadsheet are COBRA enrollments that need forms (they will all be 1H / 2A for lines 14 & 16 but they do need forms and the coverages checked within the attached). This is another item I wish we could do from the UI (creating forms for the 1H/2A COBRA enrollments). Please update each of these forms and make sure their Part IIIs are correct. Once confirmed, please finalize and run the consolidated forms as well. Please please please make sure they are showing correctly and that none of our other changes from my changes yesterday changed when you change these folks. Thanks!
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
            Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) logged work - 28/Feb/18 02:37 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               

              Code import
              Analysis
              Report rerun multiple times because of newly added correction
              Consolidated file upload on FTP
              Draft
              Re run
              Verification

            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            We have imported Part III correction for Cobra employees.
            We have rerun '2017 JE DUNN 1095C REPORT' report.
            Please refer latest run '2/28/2018 5:02:45 AM' to download if required.

            Tested scenarios/observations are as follows
            1.All valid codes are reflecting.
            2.MEC indicator is marked as 'YES' for all 12 months.
            3.Verified code corrected employees from previous run are as follows.
            Acosta Ivan
            Burton Farris
            Armando Posada
            Nicholas Marquez
            Kevin Dunn

            4.All Newly imported enrollments are reflected correctly and with 1H & 2A code for all 12 months on PDF

            We have uploaded consolidated report on EBS FTP.
            Details of uploaded report are as follows.

            URL:https://ftpsecure.ebsbenefits.com
            Path:/users/workterraaca/_Tax Year 2017/JE Dunn/Feb 28 2018
            File name: JE_dunn_Consolidated_20180228055526_5213_Collective.zip

            Thanks!

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , We have imported Part III correction for Cobra employees. We have rerun '2017 JE DUNN 1095C REPORT' report. Please refer latest run '2/28/2018 5:02:45 AM' to download if required. Tested scenarios/observations are as follows 1.All valid codes are reflecting. 2.MEC indicator is marked as 'YES' for all 12 months. 3.Verified code corrected employees from previous run are as follows. Acosta Ivan Burton Farris Armando Posada Nicholas Marquez Kevin Dunn 4.All Newly imported enrollments are reflected correctly and with 1H & 2A code for all 12 months on PDF We have uploaded consolidated report on EBS FTP. Details of uploaded report are as follows. URL: https://ftpsecure.ebsbenefits.com Path:/users/workterraaca/_Tax Year 2017/JE Dunn/Feb 28 2018 File name: JE_dunn_Consolidated_20180228055526_5213_Collective.zip Thanks!
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 25.75h [ 92700 ] 31.75h [ 114300 ]
            Worklog Id 106734 [ 106734 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Open [ 1 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 28/Feb/18 06:09 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Analysis of client query
              Discussion with Smita and query resolution
              Code changes to exclude 1H/2A employees

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 31.75h [ 114300 ] 33.25h [ 119700 ]
            Worklog Id 106833 [ 106833 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 106833 [ 106833 ]
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Categories Parent values: ACA(18524)
            Component/s ACA [ 10004 ]
            Description NA
            Key WT-12488 WB-112
            Project WORKTERRA [ 10000 ] Workterra BenAdmin [ 11501 ]
            Workflow WT_Support [ 59154 ] WB - Workterra BenAdmin Support workflow [ 64906 ]
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Categories Parent values: ACA(18524)
            Key WB-112 WT-13590
            Project Workterra BenAdmin [ 11501 ] WORKTERRA [ 10000 ]
            Workflow WB - Workterra BenAdmin Support workflow [ 64906 ] WT_Support [ 65342 ]
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ] Open [ 1 ]
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Categories Parent values: ACA(18524)
            Key WT-13590 WB-424
            Project WORKTERRA [ 10000 ] Workterra BenAdmin [ 11501 ]
            Workflow WT_Support [ 65342 ] WB - Workterra BenAdmin Support workflow [ 65467 ]
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Waiting for Input [ 11502 ]
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Workflow WB - Workterra BenAdmin Support workflow [ 65467 ] 0803 Copy of WB - Workterra BenAdmin Support workflow [ 66014 ]
            Hide
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) added a comment -

            Closing this ticket

            Show
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) added a comment - Closing this ticket
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Waiting for Input [ 11502 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Progress
            7d 44m 1
            Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made transition -
            In Progress Waiting for Customer Input
            44m 22s 1
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            In Progress On Hold
            3h 37m 1
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            On Hold In Progress
            1h 29m 1
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            Waiting for Customer Input In Progress
            81d 8h 36m 6
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            In Progress Open
            14h 55m 6
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            Open Waiting for Customer Input
            9m 35s 6
            Prashant Samal (Inactive) made transition -
            Waiting for Customer Input Open
            5d 16h 34m 1
            Prashant Samal (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            2m 27s 1
            Prashant Samal (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development Waiting for Input
            1m 58s 1
            Prashant Samal (Inactive) made transition -
            Waiting for Input Closed
            48d 22h 13m 1

              People

              Assignee:
              jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers
              Reporter:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Account Executive:
              Tracy Kot (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 33.25h
                  33.25h