Details

    • Type: Support Activity
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Labels:
      None
    • Support Task Type:
      ACA IRS Report
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Company:
      SuperHeat FGH
    • Categories:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Client

      Description

      NA

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            1095C for SuperHeat is ready to run. Thanks!

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - 1095C for SuperHeat is ready to run. Thanks!
            Hide
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have run "1095C for SuperHeat" 1095C report, find attached check list IRS 1095-C_SuperHeat_Checklist.xls for more details.
            Please refer latest run of "1095C for SuperHeat" report for verification.

            Show
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment - We have run "1095C for SuperHeat" 1095C report, find attached check list IRS 1095-C_SuperHeat_Checklist.xls for more details. Please refer latest run of "1095C for SuperHeat" report for verification.
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - - edited

            Hi all - seeing the same issue with SuperHeat that we did with Mesquite with the double lines. Examples Luis Becerra, Cesar Carillo and Nathan Bialkoski. Any ideas why? I have other items I'm reviewing so please don't re-run the forms - but please let us know why this is happening. Also, there are some employees that have a blank on line 16 with a 1E on 14. Since this client uses W2 safe harbor I figured it was because there wasn't a salary loaded (which was the case for Nick James) but when I checked Merck (who also had blanks), she has a salary loaded. Please check into this as well.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - - edited Hi all - seeing the same issue with SuperHeat that we did with Mesquite with the double lines. Examples Luis Becerra, Cesar Carillo and Nathan Bialkoski. Any ideas why? I have other items I'm reviewing so please don't re-run the forms - but please let us know why this is happening. Also, there are some employees that have a blank on line 16 with a 1E on 14. Since this client uses W2 safe harbor I figured it was because there wasn't a salary loaded (which was the case for Nick James) but when I checked Merck (who also had blanks), she has a salary loaded. Please check into this as well.
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            We have analysed Merck employees and observed that this employee is neither enrolled nor waived any
            medical plan. Employee is eligible for UHC Medical HSA Plan & UHC Medical PPO plans these two medical plans.
            EE cost of these plans are 263.14$ and 303.46$ respectively which is more than affodable cost for an employee [i.e '235.14$'].
            Hence only 1E cost is reflecting on report.

            Employees with Multiple lines : This does occur for some of the employees,but this does not affect any codes nor it is updated anywhere in the system. This comes only in analysis report. 1095 C Reports are not affected by this.
            We have added this in our learning( WT-12408 NEW REQUEST ) and will analyze it further after the execution.

            Thanks,
            Smita

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , We have analysed Merck employees and observed that this employee is neither enrolled nor waived any medical plan. Employee is eligible for UHC Medical HSA Plan & UHC Medical PPO plans these two medical plans. EE cost of these plans are 263.14$ and 303.46$ respectively which is more than affodable cost for an employee [i.e '235.14$'] . Hence only 1E cost is reflecting on report. Employees with Multiple lines : This does occur for some of the employees,but this does not affect any codes nor it is updated anywhere in the system. This comes only in analysis report. 1095 C Reports are not affected by this. We have added this in our learning( WT-12408 NEW REQUEST ) and will analyze it further after the execution. Thanks, Smita
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - why is the cost of $303.46 showing up? Example Jerry Shultz.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - why is the cost of $303.46 showing up? Example Jerry Shultz.
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            Jerry Shultz : This employee is terminated in May.This Employee had multiple medical offers of costs $263.14 and $303.46.As he was terminated in May,offer of plan with cost $263.14 got termed.For the month of May,he was enrolled in plan(UHC Medical PPO) whose cost is $303.46. Since this is the only plan which was offered to him for the whole month,$303.14 is shown in May month.

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , Jerry Shultz : This employee is terminated in May.This Employee had multiple medical offers of costs $263.14 and $303.46.As he was terminated in May,offer of plan with cost $263.14 got termed.For the month of May,he was enrolled in plan(UHC Medical PPO) whose cost is $303.46. Since this is the only plan which was offered to him for the whole month,$303.14 is shown in May month.
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Why does the analysis say No for was terminated in the month?

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Why does the analysis say No for was terminated in the month?
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            For Jerry Shultz : From his Employee history,he was terminated effective May but his status change date for termination is June(06/26/2017). So system considers status change date for Terminated in Month flag. Analysis report shows is Terminated In Month marked for June not for May.

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , For Jerry Shultz : From his Employee history,he was terminated effective May but his status change date for termination is June(06/26/2017). So system considers status change date for Terminated in Month flag. Analysis report shows is Terminated In Month marked for June not for May.
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - I changed the customization and uploaded some corrections; please re-run their forms. Thanks!

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - I changed the customization and uploaded some corrections; please re-run their forms. Thanks!
            Hide
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers

            We re-run "1095C for SuperHeat" from SuperHeat FGH production company.
            please refer latest run (Run Date - 1/17/2018 11:14:05 AM) for review.

            Observation - Line 22(1094C) : A.Qualifying Offer Method = No and D.98% Offer Method = No

            Thanks,
            Sachin Hingole

            Show
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers We re-run "1095C for SuperHeat" from SuperHeat FGH production company. please refer latest run (Run Date - 1/17/2018 11:14:05 AM) for review. Observation - Line 22(1094C) : A.Qualifying Offer Method = No and D.98% Offer Method = No Thanks, Sachin Hingole
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - why is January showing a different amount than all of the other amounts for the other months? I overrode the costs in the customization but for whatever reason January is not updating.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - why is January showing a different amount than all of the other amounts for the other months? I overrode the costs in the customization but for whatever reason January is not updating.
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            We have verified same at our end and found that code correction is done for most of the employees.
            On Code correction screen, there is some different cost for Jan month for those employees and that is reflecting on 1095-C report

            Verified employees are as follows.
            1.Russell Aulwurm
            2.James Higman
            3.Russell Aulwurm
            4.OUIS PRESCOTT
            5.Noe Alvarez

            Please let us know if you need any additional information.

            Thanks!

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , We have verified same at our end and found that code correction is done for most of the employees. On Code correction screen, there is some different cost for Jan month for those employees and that is reflecting on 1095-C report Verified employees are as follows. 1.Russell Aulwurm 2.James Higman 3.Russell Aulwurm 4.OUIS PRESCOTT 5.Noe Alvarez Please let us know if you need any additional information. Thanks!
            Hide
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) added a comment -

            Closing this ticket

            Show
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) added a comment - Closing this ticket

              People

              Assignee:
              jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers
              Reporter:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Account Executive:
              lisa davison
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 7.5h
                  7.5h