Uploaded image for project: 'WT Regression'
  1. WT Regression
  2. WR-44

WT -> Life Regression -> Maximum Disabled Child Age field not working

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: System Behaviour
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Development - In Analysis
    • Issue Importance:
      Can Wait
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 31-Bugs

      Description

      Stage
      Davis-Moore Automotive, Inc. For HSPL

      • add an employee
      • add a child of type Disabled say of age = 25 years
      • take a child life plan - go on cost and coverage - make Maximum Disabled Child Age = 20 years
      • log in with an employee and go on above child life plan

      Child life plan should not be shown - it is shown irrespective of the field Maximum Disabled Child Age's value

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) created issue -
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue is cloned by WR-45 [ WR-45 ]
            Hide
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) added a comment -

            Same issue exist under Health Benefit type.

            Show
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) added a comment - Same issue exist under Health Benefit type.
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Amnesh Goel [ amnesh.goel ] Satya [ ID10004 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Issue Importance Must Have [ 11800 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Component/s BenAdmin [ 10601 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Girija Potdar [ girija.potdar ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Dev Due Date 07/Jul/2016
            girija.potdar Girija Potdar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            girija.potdar Girija Potdar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Hide
            girija.potdar Girija Potdar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Alankar Chavan & [~meghana.kulkarni],

            -I looked into the above issue and observed that Maximum Disabled Child Age is working as expected

            • Added an employee
            • Added a child of type Disabled say of age = 25 years
            • Here we have to also choose the value of field Disabled Child on Child Page as 'Yes'.
            • Took a child life plan - on cost and coverage - made Maximum Disabled Child Age = 20 years
            • logged in with an employee and went on the above child life plan.
            • The plan is not visible to the employee.

            Please verify once.

            Thanks

            Show
            girija.potdar Girija Potdar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Alankar Chavan & [~meghana.kulkarni] , -I looked into the above issue and observed that Maximum Disabled Child Age is working as expected Added an employee Added a child of type Disabled say of age = 25 years Here we have to also choose the value of field Disabled Child on Child Page as 'Yes'. Took a child life plan - on cost and coverage - made Maximum Disabled Child Age = 20 years logged in with an employee and went on the above child life plan. The plan is not visible to the employee. Please verify once. Thanks
            girija.potdar Girija Potdar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Girija Potdar [ girija.potdar ] Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100) Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: Enrollment(10107)
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: LB QA(10201)
            Hide
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello Girija Potdar,

            Please try following scenario - it got reproduced

            • take a supp child life plan
            • max child and max disabled child age = 26
            • with partner log in - add disabled child to an employee - with disabled child flag as yes
            • plan is shown - expected
            • now make max child age as 30 and max disabled child age as 21 - still plan is shown - not expected
            Show
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Girija Potdar , Please try following scenario - it got reproduced take a supp child life plan max child and max disabled child age = 26 with partner log in - add disabled child to an employee - with disabled child flag as yes plan is shown - expected now make max child age as 30 and max disabled child age as 21 - still plan is shown - not expected
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] Girija Potdar [ girija.potdar ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Dev Due Date 07/Jul/2016 18/Jul/2016
            Hide
            girija.potdar Girija Potdar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Alankar Chavan,

            The scenario mentioned by you above is a rare case scenario where Max Child Age field value > Max Disabled Chid Age

            As per the discussion with You and Amruta, This is never a real case scenario that the Max Child Age field value > Max Disabled Chid Age field value.

            Our system works well when Max Child Age field value < Max Disabled Chid Age.

            eg Max Disabled Chid Age = 65
            Max Child Age = 25
            The system will enable disable plans properly depending on the type of child.

            This is a low priority issue.

            Thanks

            Satya, assigning it to you.

            Thanks.

            Show
            girija.potdar Girija Potdar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Alankar Chavan , The scenario mentioned by you above is a rare case scenario where Max Child Age field value > Max Disabled Chid Age As per the discussion with You and Amruta, This is never a real case scenario that the Max Child Age field value > Max Disabled Chid Age field value. Our system works well when Max Child Age field value < Max Disabled Chid Age. eg Max Disabled Chid Age = 65 Max Child Age = 25 The system will enable disable plans properly depending on the type of child. This is a low priority issue. Thanks Satya , assigning it to you. Thanks.
            girija.potdar Girija Potdar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Girija Potdar [ girija.potdar ] Satya [ ID10004 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ]
            amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
            Issue Importance Must Have [ 11800 ] Good To Have [ 11802 ]
            amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
            Issue Importance Good To Have [ 11802 ] Can Wait [ 11801 ]
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)
            amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
            Assignee Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Severity Simple [ 13101 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ]
            Dev Due Date 18/Jul/2016 15/Jun/2017
            Sprint WT Sprint 30 -Bugs [ 70 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 30 -Bugs [ 70 ] WT Sprint 31-Bugs [ 71 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Dev Due Date 15/Jun/2017
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Dev Due Date 21/Jun/2017
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Dev Due Date 21/Jun/2017 22/Jun/2017
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 22/Jun/2017 23/Jun/2017
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) logged work - 22/Jun/17 01:02 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              analysis,reproducing an issue,code debugging

            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ]
            Worklog Id 57525 [ 57525 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 22/Jun/17 03:05 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               

              scenario explanation to Shailendra

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ] 3.25h [ 11700 ]
            Worklog Id 57639 [ 57639 ]
            Hide
            satyap Satya added a comment -

            Hi Alankar Chavan & Shailendra Honrao,

            As discussed, there is no changes required for this. Please keep this scenario working as per existing implementation.

            Regards,
            Satya Prakash

            Cc: Jyoti Mayne Amruta Lohiya Vijay Siddha Samir Rakesh Roy

            Show
            satyap Satya added a comment - Hi Alankar Chavan & Shailendra Honrao , As discussed, there is no changes required for this. Please keep this scenario working as per existing implementation. Regards, Satya Prakash Cc: Jyoti Mayne Amruta Lohiya Vijay Siddha Samir Rakesh Roy
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Assignee Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ] Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
            Resolution System Behaviour [ 10100 ]
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Rejected [ 10004 ]
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) logged work - 23/Jun/17 10:44 AM
            • Time Spent:
              7h
               

              analysis,code debugging,discussion with alankar,jyoti and satya

            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 3.25h [ 11700 ] 10.25h [ 36900 ]
            Worklog Id 57862 [ 57862 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) logged work - 23/Jun/17 12:39 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               

              help to developer

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 10.25h [ 36900 ] 10.5h [ 37800 ]
            Worklog Id 57947 [ 57947 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 23/Jun/17 03:37 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              scenario explanation to Shailendra and discussion

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 10.5h [ 37800 ] 11h [ 39600 ]
            Worklog Id 58377 [ 58377 ]
            Hide
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Alankar Chavan,

            We have debug code and following are the observations:

            Customization:
            1)Added an EE Test HSPL
            2)Added a child of type Disabled, also choose the value of field Disabled Child on Child Page as 'Yes'.
            Took a child life plan on cost and coverage
            3)Go to, EE level-> Enroll Now page

            4)Done following customization on cost & coverage and Child Management page

            Observation:
            Observe the system behaviour which mentioned in the output column below.

            Sr.No. Maximum Child Age(in yrs) Maximum Disabled Child Age(in yrs) Disabled Child Age (in yrs) Current Output Expected Output
            1 25 20 15 Plan is shown Plan is shown
            2 25 20 22 Plan is shown Plan is not shown
            3 25 35 30 Plan is shown Plan is shown
            4 25 35 35 Plan is shown Plan is shown
            5 25 35 40 Plan is not shown Plan is not shown

            Analysis:
            As per this condition[(Child age <= Maximum Child Age) OR (Child age <= Maximum Disabled Child Age)] in the query,which compares
            both age but any of the condition is satisfied then plan is shown.

            Conclusion:
            As per discussion with Alankar Chavan & Satya this is the system behaviour which has implementation like
            (Child age <= Maximum Child Age) OR (Child age <= Maximum Disabled Child Age)
            So,in as I mentioned in above table in sr.no(2) 'plan is shown' which is correct behaviour.

            Thanks & Regards,
            Shailendra Honrao

            Cc: Jyoti Mayne

            Show
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Alankar Chavan , We have debug code and following are the observations: Customization: 1)Added an EE Test HSPL 2)Added a child of type Disabled, also choose the value of field Disabled Child on Child Page as 'Yes'. Took a child life plan on cost and coverage 3)Go to, EE level-> Enroll Now page 4)Done following customization on cost & coverage and Child Management page Observation: Observe the system behaviour which mentioned in the output column below. Sr.No. Maximum Child Age(in yrs) Maximum Disabled Child Age(in yrs) Disabled Child Age (in yrs) Current Output Expected Output 1 25 20 15 Plan is shown Plan is shown 2 25 20 22 Plan is shown Plan is not shown 3 25 35 30 Plan is shown Plan is shown 4 25 35 35 Plan is shown Plan is shown 5 25 35 40 Plan is not shown Plan is not shown Analysis: As per this condition [(Child age <= Maximum Child Age) OR (Child age <= Maximum Disabled Child Age)] in the query,which compares both age but any of the condition is satisfied then plan is shown. Conclusion: As per discussion with Alankar Chavan & Satya this is the system behaviour which has implementation like (Child age <= Maximum Child Age) OR (Child age <= Maximum Disabled Child Age) So,in as I mentioned in above table in sr.no(2) 'plan is shown' which is correct behaviour. Thanks & Regards, Shailendra Honrao Cc: Jyoti Mayne
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Rejected [ 10004 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) logged work - 07/Jul/17 12:23 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              added comment,reviewed it by jyoti

            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 11h [ 39600 ] 11.5h [ 41400 ]
            Worklog Id 61612 [ 61612 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) logged work - 07/Jul/17 04:16 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              analysis
              comments

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 11.5h [ 41400 ] 12h [ 43200 ]
            Worklog Id 61820 [ 61820 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 61820 [ 61820 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Girija Potdar (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            17d 4h 29m 1
            Satya made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            1d 16h 23m 1
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Reopen in Local
            4d 4h 26m 1
            Satya made transition -
            Reopen in Local In Development
            3d 22h 23m 1
            Satya made transition -
            In Development Rejected
            343d 35m 1
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            Rejected Closed
            13d 23h 56m 1

              People

              Assignee:
              alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Shailendra Honrao (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 12h
                  12h