WT RegressionProject Type: business

WT Regression

Uploaded image for project: 'WT Regression'
  1. WT Regression
  2. WR-62

Enroll Now -> LTD -> Reduction scheduled.

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Must Have

      Description

      Reduction schedule is not working for LTD benefit type.
      If We set Reduce Coverage To 50% for any specific age then Employee with greater age is not getting reduce coverage.
      If same setting we applied on life benefit plans then it is working as expected.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) created issue -
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Issue Importance Must Have [ 11800 ]
          satyap Satya made changes -
          Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ]
          amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
          Assignee Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ]
          Hide
          Permalink
          harshawardhan Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Amruta Lohiya,
          Bellow are some findings for the above JIRA :

          1. In existing system LTD does not support reduction schedule functionality.
          2. Currently reduction schedule achieved by using Life benefit type.

          To resolve above problems we have 2 solutions :
          1. Add reduction schedule functionality to LTD plans as well.
          2. Remove Reduction Schedule tab for LTD plans so it will reduce the chances of confusion.

          Please suggest which approach should we follow?

          Thanks and Regards,
          Harshawardhan.

          Show
          harshawardhan Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amruta Lohiya , Bellow are some findings for the above JIRA : 1. In existing system LTD does not support reduction schedule functionality. 2. Currently reduction schedule achieved by using Life benefit type. To resolve above problems we have 2 solutions : 1. Add reduction schedule functionality to LTD plans as well. 2. Remove Reduction Schedule tab for LTD plans so it will reduce the chances of confusion. Please suggest which approach should we follow? Thanks and Regards, Harshawardhan.
          Hide
          Permalink
          amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya added a comment -

          Harshawardhan Phalake
          Go with 1st

          Show
          amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya added a comment - Harshawardhan Phalake Go with 1st
          amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
          Assignee Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] Harshawardhan Phalake [ harshawardhan ]
          Hide
          Permalink
          harshawardhan Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) added a comment -

          CC : Amruta Lohiya, Jyoti Mayne
          Hi Hrishikesh Deshpande,
          We had tested the above scenario by reduction schedule service on local it is working fine.
          but reduction schedule is not applied instantly if salary or age change is applied.
          can you please verify it once on production as it is working fine for reduction schedule service.

          Thanks and Regards,
          Harshawardhan

          Show
          harshawardhan Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) added a comment - CC : Amruta Lohiya , Jyoti Mayne Hi Hrishikesh Deshpande , We had tested the above scenario by reduction schedule service on local it is working fine. but reduction schedule is not applied instantly if salary or age change is applied. can you please verify it once on production as it is working fine for reduction schedule service. Thanks and Regards, Harshawardhan
          harshawardhan Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          harshawardhan Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
          harshawardhan Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Harshawardhan Phalake [ harshawardhan ] Hrishikesh Deshpande [ hrishikesh.deshpande ]
          Hide
          Permalink
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) added a comment -

          It is confirmed that Reduction schedule works proper after service runs.

          Show
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) added a comment - It is confirmed that Reduction schedule works proper after service runs.
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution System Behaviour [ 10100 ]
          Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution System Behaviour [ 10100 ] Fixed [ 1 ]
          Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) made transition -
          Open In Development
          		19d 23h 6m 1
          Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made transition -
          In Development In LB Testing
          		2d 3h 53m 1
          Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made transition -
          In LB Testing Stage Testing
          		1s 1
          Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made transition -
          Stage Testing In Production Testing
          		2s 1
          Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made transition -
          In Production Testing Production Complete
          		11s 1
          Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made transition -
          Production Complete Closed
          		22h 18m 1

            People

            Assignee:
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: