-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Rejected
-
Priority:
High
-
Resolution: System Behaviour
-
Component/s: BenAdmin
-
Labels:None
-
Module:BenAdmin - Enrollment
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Issue Importance:Can Wait
ASML for HSPl
Stage
- do the plan customization of a transit plan as shown in the screen shot
- I put first row for member type employee
- After that I wanted to put another row for member type employee only - system shows the member type as Child by default which can not be changed - this is a problem.
There is no need to showing member type as Child as these plans are never for dependents
- Though I continued putting amounts as 100 200 300 400 for employee - child - employee - chid
- When employee goes on the enrollment screen - he sees all 4 coverage amounts ! which is a contradiction too as 3 of them were for Child !
Better we remove the Child member type from customization screen and just keep it restricted upto Employee
Description |
ASML for HSPl Stage * do the plan customization of a transit plan as shown in the screen shot * log in as employee and go on above transit plan - observe the coverage amount As discussed with Jyoti - I was expecting - coverage amount would be shown as a drop down list with employees salary / 2 - but system showed me a text box where user can put his coverage amount [~meghana.kulkarni] [~jyoti.mayne] |
ASML for HSPl Stage * do the plan customization of a transit plan as shown in the screen shot - I put first row for member type employee - After that I wanted to put another row for member type employee only - system shows the member type as Child by default which can not be changed - this is a problem. There is no need to showing member type as Child as these plans are never for dependents - Though I continued putting amounts as 100 200 300 400 for employee - child - employee - chid - When employee goes on the enrollment screen - he sees all 4 coverage amounts ! which is a contradiction too as 3 of them were for Child ! Better we remove the Child member type from customization screen and just keep it restricted upto Employee |
Assignee | Satya [ ID10004 ] | Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] |
Issue Importance | Must Have [ 11800 ] | Good To Have [ 11802 ] |
Issue Importance | Good To Have [ 11802 ] | Can Wait [ 11801 ] |
Assignee | Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] | Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] |
Severity | Medium [ 13102 ] |
Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
Resolution | System Behaviour [ 10100 ] | |
Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Rejected [ 10004 ] |
Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times |
---|
|
384d 4h 53m | 1 |
|
8s | 1 |
This is as per system design. So closing this.
Cc: Satya, Vijay Siddha, Gaurav Sodani