Uploaded image for project: 'WT Regression'
  1. WT Regression
  2. WR-82

WR -> Life Regression -> Require tier/coverage match up does not work for LIFE

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Must Have

      Description

      Stage
      CST FOR HSPL

      • parent plan is EE Supp Life pla
      • contingent (not forced) plan is - SP Supp Life Plan
      • Require tier/coverage match up - set to Exact Match
      • Employee enrolled parent plan

      Employee could easily enrolled with the contingent plan with the greater amount of coverage than the parent plan - which is not expected

        Attachments

          Activity

          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) created issue -
          satyap Satya made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Issue Importance Must Have [ 11800 ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Assignee Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Dev Due Date 17/Aug/2016
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
          Hide
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Alankar Chavan,

          This is invalid scenario, as "Required tier/Coverage Match up" flag is useful in Health Benefit Type only.

          As discussed with Amruta Lohiya, we are hiding this flag for other benefit type except Health.

          Thanks and Regards,
          :: Umesh Kadam

          CC: Amruta Lohiya, Jyoti Mayne

          Show
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Alankar Chavan , This is invalid scenario, as "Required tier/Coverage Match up" flag is useful in Health Benefit Type only. As discussed with Amruta Lohiya , we are hiding this flag for other benefit type except Health. Thanks and Regards, :: Umesh Kadam CC: Amruta Lohiya , Jyoti Mayne
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
          Hide
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Hello Umesh Kadam,

          As the label for this field 'Required tier/Coverage Match up' wrongly misinterprets that this should work also for LIFE - this bug was logged.

          Earlier with the same assumption and understanding - that this flag is only for health - we dint log this issue. But after discussing it with Amruta only - we tested it again and logged it in JIRA.

          Please assign this ticket to me with appropriate statuses once you are done with the changes and changes are deployed on LB.

          CC - [~meghana.kulkarni] Deepali Tidke Rakesh Roy Amruta Lohiya

          Show
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hello Umesh Kadam , As the label for this field 'Required tier/ Coverage Match up' wrongly misinterprets that this should work also for LIFE - this bug was logged. Earlier with the same assumption and understanding - that this flag is only for health - we dint log this issue. But after discussing it with Amruta only - we tested it again and logged it in JIRA. Please assign this ticket to me with appropriate statuses once you are done with the changes and changes are deployed on LB. CC - [~meghana.kulkarni] Deepali Tidke Rakesh Roy Amruta Lohiya
          amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Dev Due Date 17/Aug/2016 10/Aug/2016
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Dev Due Date 10/Aug/2016 11/Aug/2016
          gokul.sonawane Gokul Sonawane (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
          Hide
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

          Tested this on LB on LBSanityCOD company on Chrome,IE 11 and Firefox Browsers.

          Now Require tier/coverage match up field is disabled on all plans other than Health benefit type.

          Ready for Stage.

          Show
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Tested this on LB on LBSanityCOD company on Chrome,IE 11 and Firefox Browsers. Now Require tier/coverage match up field is disabled on all plans other than Health benefit type. Ready for Stage.
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
          gokul.sonawane Gokul Sonawane (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
          Hide
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

          Tested on Stage - Working Well

          Require tier/coverage match up flag has been removed for all benefit types other than Health.
          Tested in Adding / Updating cases (adding a new plan under benefit plan and referring an existing plan) - the flag has been removed.

          Ready for Production

          CC - Deepali Tidke Rakesh Roy Venkatesh Pujari

          Show
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - Tested on Stage - Working Well Require tier/coverage match up flag has been removed for all benefit types other than Health. Tested in Adding / Updating cases (adding a new plan under benefit plan and referring an existing plan) - the flag has been removed. Ready for Production CC - Deepali Tidke Rakesh Roy Venkatesh Pujari
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Developer Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
          ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
          Hide
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

          Tested this on Production on JE DUNN FOR HSPL company on Chrome,IE 11 and Firefox Browsers.

          Now Require tier/coverage match up field is disabled on all plans other than Health benefit type.

          Show
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Tested this on Production on JE DUNN FOR HSPL company on Chrome,IE 11 and Firefox Browsers. Now Require tier/coverage match up field is disabled on all plans other than Health benefit type.
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
          Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made transition -
          Open In Development
          10d 23h 35m 1
          Amruta Lohiya made transition -
          In Development In LB Testing
          2h 40m 1
          Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
          In LB Testing Stage Testing
          4d 5h 1
          Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
          Stage Testing In Production Testing
          5d 11h 2m 1
          Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
          In Production Testing Production Complete
          5s 1
          Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
          Production Complete Closed
          3s 1

            People

            Assignee:
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive)
            Developer:
            Umesh Kadam (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Dev Due Date: