Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-10131

Metso Benefits | COVG and OFFR row count doesn't match

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Bug Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Company:
      Metso Benefits
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      Hi Revansiddha Gaur ,

      While testing for the incremental transactions on Metso file it was observed that offer and coverage segments count are not matching (OFFR !=COVG) .

      Please find the Employees sent through mail

      Please let me know if anything required .

      Thanks ,
      Kanchan J

      CC-Prajakta Belhe Smita Pawar Mandar Kulkarni Yogita Bhadane

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment -

            Please upload the test case documentation before start testing.

            Show
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment - Please upload the test case documentation before start testing.
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Revansiddha Gaur,

            Please update 3C's for same.

            Thanks,
            Smita

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Revansiddha Gaur , Please update 3C's for same. Thanks, Smita
            Hide
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment -

            CONCERN: Multiple events showing in OFFR segment for same enrollment.

            CAUSE: User raise events for various purpose but not any changes reflected using that event in enrollment.
            And our implementation was whatever events pertaining to the coverage start date matching going to show on the file.

            CORRECTION: Implementation changed such that only such event has been shown whose enrollment is done by the event.

            For more details attached technical document- TechSpec_WT-10131_PreventDuplicateEvents.zip

            Thanks,
            Revan

            Show
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment - CONCERN: Multiple events showing in OFFR segment for same enrollment. CAUSE: User raise events for various purpose but not any changes reflected using that event in enrollment. And our implementation was whatever events pertaining to the coverage start date matching going to show on the file. CORRECTION: Implementation changed such that only such event has been shown whose enrollment is done by the event. For more details attached technical document- TechSpec_WT-10131_PreventDuplicateEvents.zip Thanks, Revan
            Hide
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Smita Pawar,

            Please upload the test case documentation in the JIRA.

            Thanks,
            Revan

            Show
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Smita Pawar , Please upload the test case documentation in the JIRA. Thanks, Revan
            Hide
            kanchan.jalgaonkar Kanchan Jalgaonkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Revansiddha Gaur ,

            Please find the attached testcase document .

            Thanks .
            Kanchan Jalgaonkar

            CC-Smita Pawar Prajakta Belhe

            Show
            kanchan.jalgaonkar Kanchan Jalgaonkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Revansiddha Gaur , Please find the attached testcase document . Thanks . Kanchan Jalgaonkar CC- Smita Pawar Prajakta Belhe
            Hide
            yogita.bhadane Yogita Bhadane (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Revansiddha Gaur,

            I have exported the metso ACA template and found that OFFER and COVG segment count did not match.

            Please find below details for same:

            Environment - LB
            Company - For QA LB METSO Prod Copy
            Template name - 'Metso ADP - ACA Employee'

            Please check.

            Thanks,
            Yogita

            Mandar Kulkarni Prajakta Belhe Smita Pawar

            Show
            yogita.bhadane Yogita Bhadane (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Revansiddha Gaur , I have exported the metso ACA template and found that OFFER and COVG segment count did not match. Please find below details for same: Environment - LB Company - For QA LB METSO Prod Copy Template name - 'Metso ADP - ACA Employee' Please check. Thanks, Yogita Mandar Kulkarni Prajakta Belhe Smita Pawar
            Hide
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Yogita Bhadane/ Smita Pawar,

            System behavioring as per data present in enrollment data. After analysing the data between LB Database & Prod Database there is discrepancy. Discrepancy is showing like employee is enrolled as well as employee is waived from same date.
            This discrepancy about the data is shown to Smita Pawar in person.

            Thanks,
            Revan
            Yogesh Chaudhari Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

            Show
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Yogita Bhadane / Smita Pawar , System behavioring as per data present in enrollment data. After analysing the data between LB Database & Prod Database there is discrepancy. Discrepancy is showing like employee is enrolled as well as employee is waived from same date. This discrepancy about the data is shown to Smita Pawar in person. Thanks, Revan Yogesh Chaudhari Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
            Hide
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Smita Pawar,

            Please confirm what is next stage date as its not able able to receive mail for stage deployment today (09/06/2017).

            Thanks,
            Revan

            Yogesh Chaudhari Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Sachin Hingole Rakesh Roy

            Show
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Smita Pawar , Please confirm what is next stage date as its not able able to receive mail for stage deployment today (09/06/2017). Thanks, Revan Yogesh Chaudhari Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Sachin Hingole Rakesh Roy
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Revansiddha Gaur,

            As discussed with Nandkumar, we will take Production data base down and confirm whether it is data issue or not. Then we will update stage due date for this ticket.

            FYI Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar, Yogesh Chaudhari,Rakesh Roy,Sachin Hingole.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Revansiddha Gaur , As discussed with Nandkumar, we will take Production data base down and confirm whether it is data issue or not. Then we will update stage due date for this ticket. FYI Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Yogesh Chaudhari , Rakesh Roy , Sachin Hingole .
            Hide
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Smita Pawar,

            Concern: Capturing multiple offer records in case of waive enrollment only.

            Cause: Capturing all waive enrollment records for the employees as there are present waive enrollment entries by template specific.

            Correction: Modified the code changes to capture only waive enrollments specific to templateid.

            Note : Documentation is re-updated.
            Thanks,
            Revan

            Yogesh Chaudhari Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

            Show
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Smita Pawar , Concern: Capturing multiple offer records in case of waive enrollment only. Cause: Capturing all waive enrollment records for the employees as there are present waive enrollment entries by template specific. Correction: Modified the code changes to capture only waive enrollments specific to templateid. Note : Documentation is re-updated. Thanks, Revan Yogesh Chaudhari Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
            Hide
            yogita.bhadane Yogita Bhadane (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            This is tested on LB. Working as expected.

            Hence, Marking it as ready for stage.

            Thanks,
            Yogita

            CC - Mandar Kulkarni Smita Pawar Prajakta Belhe

            Show
            yogita.bhadane Yogita Bhadane (Inactive) added a comment - - edited This is tested on LB. Working as expected. Hence, Marking it as ready for stage. Thanks, Yogita CC - Mandar Kulkarni Smita Pawar Prajakta Belhe
            Hide
            yogita.bhadane Yogita Bhadane (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Due to WT-9760 keeping this task on hold.

            Thanks,
            Yogita

            Smita Pawar Mandar Kulkarni Prajakta Belhe

            Show
            yogita.bhadane Yogita Bhadane (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Due to WT-9760 keeping this task on hold. Thanks, Yogita Smita Pawar Mandar Kulkarni Prajakta Belhe
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            To add work log

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - To add work log

              People

              Assignee:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              kanchan.jalgaonkar Kanchan Jalgaonkar (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive)
              QA:
              Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 120h
                  120h
                  Remaining:
                  Time Spent - 57h Remaining Estimate - 63h
                  63h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 57h Remaining Estimate - 63h
                  57h