-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Rejected
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Resolution: System Behaviour
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ACA
-
Labels:None
-
Bug Type:Functional
-
Bug Severity:Medium
-
Module:ACA
-
Reported by:Harbinger
Hi Revansiddha Gaur ,
While testing for the incremental transactions on Metso file it was observed that some employees are getting coverages without eligibility
Please find the below sample Employee
EEID|900037284|900037284|John||Test|M|10/13/1954
OFFR|900037284|10/13/1955|Open Enrollment|01/01/2017|01/01/2017|01/01/2017|12/31/2017|01/01/2017 08:46:23.950000 AM
COVG|900037284|Open Enrollment|01/01/2017|566|HIGHMARK PPO 90|EE+SP|Employee + Spouse|269.98|1057.81|01/01/2017|||||N|||11/04/2016 02:16:12.000000 PM|900037284
DEPI|900037284|910013028|1|Elizabeth|A|Test|Spouse|Y|11/21/1957|F|01/01/2017||A|900037284
Please let me know if anything required .
Thanks ,
Kanchan J
CC-Prajakta Belhe Smita Pawar Mandar Kulkarni Yogita Bhadane
- relates to
-
WT-9760 ACA: Metso- Incremental transactions on Full file when period is more than one month.
-
- Resolution Setting
-
If not provided the date it will consider only for single month. So as per discussion with team we will not export file for single month. If user wants to export file for any month in that case start date should be 01/01/2017 and end date should be expected month end date.Eligibility will get populated on file for all the coverage records
If the records is already sent on Jan file in that case set Send Termination once = true. while exporting month file.
Currenlty working as per system behavior and not a bug. We have already taken new change request of consideration of from date as fiscal year start date and to date as current system date under JIRA ID
WT-10365in case of from and to date as blank.Thanks,
Revan
Yogesh Chaudhari Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Smita Pawar