Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-11244

County of Sutter-Invoice Adjustment Errors

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Production Complete
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Report
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Company:
      County of Sutter
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 38 - Bugs

      Description

      Hello,

      Per the client: County of Sutter has notified BCC they are having an issue with the billing adjustments on their August invoice (please see attached).
       
      We have looked into the issue with Harminder Dosanjh:
      1.       Beginning May 1, 2017 when BCC begins administration of COSR, Employee is enrolled in the Anthem PPO 500 plan as Employee + 1 Child (Rate $1,463.00)
      2.       On June 20, 2017 QE Add Newborn occurs, takes the Anthem PPO 500 plan enrollment to Employee + 2 Children (Rate $2,072.00)
      3.       Billing rule is Free In/Pay Out and is built in the Billing Period Policies on the General Plan Design page as follows:
      a.       Billing Period Adds = Premiums Waived After the Cut-Off Day; Day of Billing Period = 1
      b.      Billing Period Changes/Terminations = Bill for Entire Month; Day of Billing Period = 0
      4.       The August invoice incorrectly credits the June premium.
      5.       The August invoice does correctly credit and bill the July adjustments
      6.       The August invoice does correctly bill for the month of August

             Kenya Olivas is having the exact same issue as Harminder Dosanjh
      a.        EE has been effective since 5/1/17 on the Anthem PPO 1000 plan with EE + SP + 2+ Children on the plan (Rate $1,698.00)
      b.      On 6/23/17 QE Add Newborn was initiated for a baby born 5/24/17.  This has no effect on the enrollment level as the EE already has 2+ Children on the plan
      c.       Billing rule is Free In/Pay Out and is built in the Billing Period Policies on the General Plan Design page as follows:
        i.      Billing Period Adds = Premiums Waived After the Cut-Off Day; Day of Billing Period = 1
          ii.      Billing Period Changes/Terminations = Bill for Entire Month; Day of Billing Period = 0
      d.      The August invoice incorrectly credits the May premium
      e.      The August invoice does correctly credit and bill the June and July adjustments
      f.        The August invoice does correctly bill for the month of August

       
      Could you please have your development team look into this ASAP, the group is extremely unhappy with their invoices.

      Thank you,
      Kira
      Debbie Kulling

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Kira.Hamilton Kira Hamilton (Inactive) created issue -
            Hide
            satyap Satya added a comment -

            Hi Prasanna,

            Can you please get this checked on priority?

            Regards,
            Satya Prakash

            Cc: Gaurav Sodani Rakesh Roy Samir

            Show
            satyap Satya added a comment - Hi Prasanna, Can you please get this checked on priority? Regards, Satya Prakash Cc: Gaurav Sodani Rakesh Roy Samir
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Assignee Vijay Siddha [ vijays ] Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ]
            Hide
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Debbie Kulling,

            We are working on this issue.
            Have found the root cause.
            Currently, scanning the data for more such records. Will provide you an update in half an hour.

            Thank you!

            cc: Gaurav Sodani

            Show
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , We are working on this issue. Have found the root cause. Currently, scanning the data for more such records. Will provide you an update in half an hour. Thank you! cc: Gaurav Sodani
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            Hide
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Debbie Kulling,

            Before generating the August invoice, with tier changes, self insured components cost was also changed.
            Mentioned 2 employees have different scenarios. One is fixed where as issue for one scenario still persist.

            We have analysed the scenarios for mentioned employees. Have scanned the invoices generated till Oct 2017 for this company, to check if any more incorrect records exists with these scenarios. We also tried regenerating the August 2017 invoice again on HSPL copy to check if the issue still persist in the system or not.

            Following are the findings:
            #1.
            Employee : Harminder Dosanjh
            Plan Name: Anthem PPO 500
            Effective Date: 5/1/2017
            Termination Date: 6/5/2017
            Extra credits appearing for Tier: Employee + 1 Child
            Scenario: Election effective date and termination date fall in different months.
            During this span cost changes for components Anthem and SISC Claim Fund under rate Anthem PPO 500 also happened.

            System calculated 2 retro terms(credits) for this:
            one for component cost change which is correct and other for Tier change which is incorrect as per the plan billing term policy.
            System calculated 1 retro add (debit) for this:
            one add for cost change which is correct.
            While displaying the final adjustments, 1 retro add and 1 retro term cancelled each other and only 1 retro term was remaining which appeared on invoice.

            Following employees are also affected in August 2017 invoice:

            First Name Last Name Plan Name Effective Date Term Date Adjustment Month Tier
            KIRN JOHAL Anthem PPO 250 5/1/2017 6/9/2017 June 2017 Employee + Spouse
            BRITTANY SCHIES Anthem PPO 1000 5/1/2017 6/18/2017 June 2017 Employee

            When we regenerated August 2017 invoice, we got credit and debit adjustment for the month of June 2017 which is correct, as component cost changes happened.
            Hence, issue related to this scenario is resolved and not in system any more.

            #2.
            Employee : Kenya Olivas
            Plan Name: Anthem PPO 1000
            Effective Date: 5/1/2017
            Termination Date: 5/24/2017
            Extra credits appearing for Tier: Employee, Spouse + 2+ Children
            Scenario: Election effective date and termination date fall in same month.
            During this span cost changes for components Anthem and SISC Claim Fund under rate Anthem PPO 1000 also happened.

            As stated above.
            System calculated 2 retro terms(credits) for this:
            One for component cost change which is correct and other for coverage change (though tier change did not happened but system treats coverage changes as separate elections). Credits related to coverage changes were calculated incorrectly by the system.
            System calculated 1 retro add (debit) for this:
            One for cost change which is correct.
            While displaying the final adjustments, 1 retro add and 1 retro term cancelled each other and only 1 retro term was remaining which appeared on invoice.

            We did not found any other affected employee for this scenario.
            But, when we regenerated August 2017, found that this issue still persist and needs to be fixed.

            Following needs to be worked up on:
            1. Issue fix for same month scenario. We will need 2-3 days to fix the issue, as change is required in adjustment logic which involves lot of scenario verification.
            2. Scanning these 2 scenarios for other BCC companies for invoices generated till now. This will be done by 26-Sep-2017.
            3. Providing adjustments i.e. retro add costs, for affected elections in upcoming invoices to be generated. We will have to manipulate billing data for this. Please confirm if data manipulation needs to be done or not?

            Please update on #3 (data manipulation point) and let us know if any thing more is required.

            Thank you!

            cc: Kira Hamilton, Gaurav Sodani, Satya, Samir

            Show
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , Before generating the August invoice, with tier changes, self insured components cost was also changed. Mentioned 2 employees have different scenarios. One is fixed where as issue for one scenario still persist. We have analysed the scenarios for mentioned employees. Have scanned the invoices generated till Oct 2017 for this company, to check if any more incorrect records exists with these scenarios. We also tried regenerating the August 2017 invoice again on HSPL copy to check if the issue still persist in the system or not. Following are the findings: #1. Employee : Harminder Dosanjh Plan Name: Anthem PPO 500 Effective Date: 5/1/2017 Termination Date: 6/5/2017 Extra credits appearing for Tier: Employee + 1 Child Scenario: Election effective date and termination date fall in different months. During this span cost changes for components Anthem and SISC Claim Fund under rate Anthem PPO 500 also happened. System calculated 2 retro terms(credits) for this: one for component cost change which is correct and other for Tier change which is incorrect as per the plan billing term policy. System calculated 1 retro add (debit) for this: one add for cost change which is correct. While displaying the final adjustments, 1 retro add and 1 retro term cancelled each other and only 1 retro term was remaining which appeared on invoice. Following employees are also affected in August 2017 invoice: First Name Last Name Plan Name Effective Date Term Date Adjustment Month Tier KIRN JOHAL Anthem PPO 250 5/1/2017 6/9/2017 June 2017 Employee + Spouse BRITTANY SCHIES Anthem PPO 1000 5/1/2017 6/18/2017 June 2017 Employee When we regenerated August 2017 invoice, we got credit and debit adjustment for the month of June 2017 which is correct, as component cost changes happened. Hence, issue related to this scenario is resolved and not in system any more. #2. Employee : Kenya Olivas Plan Name: Anthem PPO 1000 Effective Date: 5/1/2017 Termination Date: 5/24/2017 Extra credits appearing for Tier: Employee, Spouse + 2+ Children Scenario: Election effective date and termination date fall in same month. During this span cost changes for components Anthem and SISC Claim Fund under rate Anthem PPO 1000 also happened. As stated above. System calculated 2 retro terms(credits) for this: One for component cost change which is correct and other for coverage change (though tier change did not happened but system treats coverage changes as separate elections). Credits related to coverage changes were calculated incorrectly by the system. System calculated 1 retro add (debit) for this: One for cost change which is correct. While displaying the final adjustments, 1 retro add and 1 retro term cancelled each other and only 1 retro term was remaining which appeared on invoice. We did not found any other affected employee for this scenario. But, when we regenerated August 2017, found that this issue still persist and needs to be fixed. Following needs to be worked up on: 1. Issue fix for same month scenario. We will need 2-3 days to fix the issue, as change is required in adjustment logic which involves lot of scenario verification. 2. Scanning these 2 scenarios for other BCC companies for invoices generated till now. This will be done by 26-Sep-2017. 3. Providing adjustments i.e. retro add costs, for affected elections in upcoming invoices to be generated. We will have to manipulate billing data for this. Please confirm if data manipulation needs to be done or not? Please update on #3 (data manipulation point) and let us know if any thing more is required. Thank you! cc: Kira Hamilton , Gaurav Sodani , Satya , Samir
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 23/Sep/17 09:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Issue analysis
              Data scan
              JIRA update
              Email Communication

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 28/Sep/2017
            Dev Estimates 23
            Sprint WT Sprint 38 - Bugs [ 89 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 25/Sep/17 01:14 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Jira go through, analysis, discussion, issue repro, code fix

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 5h [ 18000 ]
            Worklog Id 81124 [ 81124 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 25/Sep/17 09:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.75h
               

              Discussion on issue repro
              Root cause
              Fix to be done

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ] Jyoti Agrawal [ jyoti.agrawal ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 5h [ 18000 ] 5.75h [ 20700 ]
            Worklog Id 81236 [ 81236 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Environment Production [ 10005 ]
            Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100) Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: Report(10109)
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 5.75h [ 20700 ] 10.75h [ 38700 ]
            Worklog Id 81442 [ 81442 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 26/Sep/17 01:12 PM
            • Time Spent:
              7h
               

              Unit Testing

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 10.75h [ 38700 ] 17.75h [ 63900 ]
            Worklog Id 81694 [ 81694 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 26/Sep/17 10:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Discussion on changes done

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 27/Sep/17 01:00 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               

              Data scan script

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ] Jyoti Agrawal [ jyoti.agrawal ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 27/Sep/17 01:06 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Unit Testing, code fixing

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 17.75h [ 63900 ] 21.75h [ 78300 ]
            Worklog Id 81949 [ 81949 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 27/Sep/17 07:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Code review
              Script to scan Data for affected elections - In Progress

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 27/Sep/2017
            Code Reviewed By Prasanna Karlekar [ 11907 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 21.75h [ 78300 ] 22.75h [ 81900 ]
            Worklog Id 82087 [ 82087 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            Hide
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) added a comment -

            Below are 3C's :-
            Concern :-
            When election ,tier change and cost change happens in same month and the addition or removal of dependents doesnt really affect tier, then adjustment shows no retro add(due to cost change) for the month in which changes occurred.
            Example :- An employee is enrolled with tier EE+Spouse+2+child effective from 1/1/2017. Invoice is generated for Jan 2017.
            On 1/15/17 he adds one more child. Tier remains same with EE+Spouse+2+child but there is enrollment change. He makes cost change too. Generates invoice for February
            Expected Adjustment :- Retro add and term cost for January as there is cost change.
            Actual :- Only retro term appears in invoice for January

            Cause :- Such scenario were not handled when there is coverage change for Health plan but tier remains same and simultaneously cost is also changed.

            Correction :- Handled above scenario

            Affected file :- OES_SP_GetRetroBillingDetails_InvoiceBenefitWise

            Affected Area :- Adjustement part of invoice

            Tested Scenarios :-
            1) Health benefits
            a)Self Insured rate - Change in cost and tier, when change in tier doesnt really effect tier id
            Tier change and cost change in same month of enrollment
            Tier change and cost change in different month of enrollment
            b) Billed rate
            Tier change and cost change in same month of enrollment
            Tier change and cost change in different month of enrollment

            2)Non health benefits :-
            Coverage change and cost change in same month
            Coverage change and cost change in diff month

            Show
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) added a comment - Below are 3C's :- Concern :- When election ,tier change and cost change happens in same month and the addition or removal of dependents doesnt really affect tier, then adjustment shows no retro add(due to cost change) for the month in which changes occurred. Example :- An employee is enrolled with tier EE+Spouse+2+child effective from 1/1/2017. Invoice is generated for Jan 2017. On 1/15/17 he adds one more child. Tier remains same with EE+Spouse+2+child but there is enrollment change. He makes cost change too. Generates invoice for February Expected Adjustment :- Retro add and term cost for January as there is cost change. Actual :- Only retro term appears in invoice for January Cause :- Such scenario were not handled when there is coverage change for Health plan but tier remains same and simultaneously cost is also changed. Correction :- Handled above scenario Affected file :- OES_SP_GetRetroBillingDetails_InvoiceBenefitWise Affected Area :- Adjustement part of invoice Tested Scenarios :- 1) Health benefits a)Self Insured rate - Change in cost and tier, when change in tier doesnt really effect tier id Tier change and cost change in same month of enrollment Tier change and cost change in different month of enrollment b) Billed rate Tier change and cost change in same month of enrollment Tier change and cost change in different month of enrollment 2)Non health benefits :- Coverage change and cost change in same month Coverage change and cost change in diff month
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Agrawal [ jyoti.agrawal ] Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Hide
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment -
            Show
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment - Venkatesh Pujari
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] Amita Sangani [ amita.sangani ]
            Hide
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Debbie Kulling,

            Following are the updates:
            #1. Issue fix:
            We have fixed the issue and it is deployed in our local test environment. After QA verification it will be deployed further. As Jyoti Agrawal mentioned in her comments above, issue was due to following actions that happened simultaneously / in same span:

            • Mid month coverage change
            • Coverage change happened but it did not impacted the health tier. Implies, health tier before and after coverage change remained same.
            • Self insured component cost was also changed

            We had verified coverage change scenarios but not with such combination.

            #2. Data scan
            We have scanned these 2 scenarios for other BCC companies for invoices generated till now.
            No other BCC company is affected with this. We did not got any records apart from following four that we mentioned earlier:

            • Harminder Dosanjh
            • KIRN JOHAL
            • BRITTANY SCHIES
            • Kenya Olivas

            #3. Bringing adjustments on upcoming invoice:
            Providing adjustments i.e. retro add costs, for affected elections in upcoming invoice to be generated. We will have to manipulate billing data for this so that adjustments appear for the month in which coverage change happened. Please confirm if data manipulation needs to be done or not?

            We are keeping this JIRA with us as QA testing is in progress.

            Please update us on #3 so that data can be manipulated before Nov 2016 invoice generation.

            Thank you!

            cc: Kira Hamilton, Jyoti Agrawal, Gaurav Sodani, Venkatesh Pujari

            Show
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , Following are the updates: #1. Issue fix: We have fixed the issue and it is deployed in our local test environment. After QA verification it will be deployed further. As Jyoti Agrawal mentioned in her comments above, issue was due to following actions that happened simultaneously / in same span: Mid month coverage change Coverage change happened but it did not impacted the health tier. Implies, health tier before and after coverage change remained same. Self insured component cost was also changed We had verified coverage change scenarios but not with such combination. #2. Data scan We have scanned these 2 scenarios for other BCC companies for invoices generated till now. No other BCC company is affected with this. We did not got any records apart from following four that we mentioned earlier: Harminder Dosanjh KIRN JOHAL BRITTANY SCHIES Kenya Olivas #3. Bringing adjustments on upcoming invoice: Providing adjustments i.e. retro add costs, for affected elections in upcoming invoice to be generated. We will have to manipulate billing data for this so that adjustments appear for the month in which coverage change happened. Please confirm if data manipulation needs to be done or not? We are keeping this JIRA with us as QA testing is in progress. Please update us on #3 so that data can be manipulated before Nov 2016 invoice generation. Thank you! cc: Kira Hamilton , Jyoti Agrawal , Gaurav Sodani , Venkatesh Pujari
            Kira.Hamilton Kira Hamilton (Inactive) made changes -
            Company County of Sutter [ 18405 ]
            Hide
            Kira.Hamilton Kira Hamilton (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello,

            Regarding "Please confirm if data manipulation needs to be done or not" Susan at BCC emailed on Sept 28 stating "Yes, I am confirming that this does need to happen."

            Thank you,
            Kira Hamilton
            Debbie Kulling

            Show
            Kira.Hamilton Kira Hamilton (Inactive) added a comment - Hello, Regarding "Please confirm if data manipulation needs to be done or not" Susan at BCC emailed on Sept 28 stating "Yes, I am confirming that this does need to happen." Thank you, Kira Hamilton Debbie Kulling
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 28/Sep/17 09:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2.5h
               

              Data scanning script
              Data scan for list of employees affected
              JIRA update

            Hide
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Kira Hamilton,

            We will add these adjustments and verify the Nov 2017 invoice on HSPL copy at our end by 3-Oct-2017.

            Thank you!

            cc: Jyoti Agrawal, Gaurav Sodani, Venkatesh Pujari

            Show
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Kira Hamilton , We will add these adjustments and verify the Nov 2017 invoice on HSPL copy at our end by 3-Oct-2017. Thank you! cc: Jyoti Agrawal , Gaurav Sodani , Venkatesh Pujari
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 22.75h [ 81900 ] 23.25h [ 83700 ]
            Worklog Id 82736 [ 82736 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 23.25h [ 83700 ] 23.5h [ 84600 ]
            Worklog Id 82742 [ 82742 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 23.5h [ 84600 ] 26h [ 93600 ]
            Worklog Id 82752 [ 82752 ]
            amita.sangani Amita Sangani (Inactive) logged work - 29/Sep/17 12:39 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               
              <No comment>
            amita.sangani Amita Sangani (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 26h [ 93600 ] 27h [ 97200 ]
            Worklog Id 82803 [ 82803 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            QA Amita Sangani [ amita.sangani ]
            Hide
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Kira Hamilton,

            Have done the required corrections for mentioned 4 employees. Their adjustments will appear in Nov 2017 invoice that will be generated.

            Below are the details:

            First Name Last Name Plan Name Effective Date Term Date Adjustment Expected for Month Tier
            HARMINDER DOSANJH Anthem PPO 500 5/1/2017 6/5/2017 June 2017 Employee + 1 Child
            KIRN JOHAL Anthem PPO 250 5/1/2017 6/9/2017 June 2017 Employee + Spouse
            BRITTANY SCHIES Anthem PPO 1000 5/1/2017 6/18/2017 June 2017 Employee
            KENYA OLIVAS Anthem PPO 1000 5/1/2017 5/24/2017 May 2017 Employee, Spouse + 2+ Children

            We verified these corrections at our end.
            Please confirm at your end once.

            Thank you!

            cc: Jyoti Agrawal, Gaurav Sodani, Venkatesh Pujari

            Show
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Kira Hamilton , Have done the required corrections for mentioned 4 employees. Their adjustments will appear in Nov 2017 invoice that will be generated. Below are the details: First Name Last Name Plan Name Effective Date Term Date Adjustment Expected for Month Tier HARMINDER DOSANJH Anthem PPO 500 5/1/2017 6/5/2017 June 2017 Employee + 1 Child KIRN JOHAL Anthem PPO 250 5/1/2017 6/9/2017 June 2017 Employee + Spouse BRITTANY SCHIES Anthem PPO 1000 5/1/2017 6/18/2017 June 2017 Employee KENYA OLIVAS Anthem PPO 1000 5/1/2017 5/24/2017 May 2017 Employee, Spouse + 2+ Children We verified these corrections at our end. Please confirm at your end once. Thank you! cc: Jyoti Agrawal , Gaurav Sodani , Venkatesh Pujari
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 03/Oct/17 09:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3.5h
               

              Analysis of impact on Billing Report for data correction done
              Data correction
              Invoice verification after correction
              JIRA update

            amita.sangani Amita Sangani (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 27h [ 97200 ] 30h [ 108000 ]
            Worklog Id 83200 [ 83200 ]
            amita.sangani Amita Sangani (Inactive) logged work - 04/Oct/17 12:45 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3.3h
               

              Internal discussion with Jyoti and Sachin
              Understand ticket
              Tested 1 scenario
              Create employee, Customise OE period, Raise QE
              not able to generate invoice properly on For QA Matt company on LB environment

            amita.sangani Amita Sangani (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 30h [ 108000 ] 33.3h [ 119880 ]
            Worklog Id 83205 [ 83205 ]
            amita.sangani Amita Sangani (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ] 3h [ 10800 ]
            Time Spent 33.3h [ 119880 ] 30.3h [ 109080 ]
            Worklog Id 83200 [ 83200 ]
            Worklog Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ]
            Hide
            amita.sangani Amita Sangani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Sachin Hingole,

            As per discussion with Jyoti and Prasanna this ticket needs database testing hence assigning this jira to Venkatesh.

            CC:Sachin Hingole,Prasad Pise,Rakesh Roy

            Show
            amita.sangani Amita Sangani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Sachin Hingole , As per discussion with Jyoti and Prasanna this ticket needs database testing hence assigning this jira to Venkatesh. CC: Sachin Hingole , Prasad Pise , Rakesh Roy
            amita.sangani Amita Sangani (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Amita Sangani [ amita.sangani ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 05/Oct/17 07:04 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Understanding issue

            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 3h [ 10800 ] 1h [ 3600 ]
            Time Spent 30.3h [ 109080 ] 32.3h [ 116280 ]
            Worklog Id 83453 [ 83453 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 06/Oct/17 09:24 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Testing on LB

            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] Jyoti Agrawal [ jyoti.agrawal ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 1h [ 3600 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 32.3h [ 116280 ] 33.3h [ 119880 ]
            Worklog Id 83736 [ 83736 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Comment [ Hi [~jyoti.agrawal],

            I have started testing this on LB on For QA ASML company. I think there exists some issue after your fix also. Please find the below mentioned scenario and do revert if anything is wrong here :-

            1] *Rate Name* :- Billed Rate (01/01/2017 to 12/31/2017 )
               *Health Tier* :- EE+2+Children --> billed rate value = 200
                
                *Plan Name* :- Venky Gold
                *Add Policy* :- Bill for entire month
                *Term Policy* :- Bill for entire month

                 *Enrollment details:-*
                 1] Edit an employee who has 3 children. Now enroll this EE in Venky Gold plan effective from 10/01/2017 with tier as EE+2+Children. That is enrollment in Venky Gold plan is with Employee and 2 children. Now generate the invoice for the Oct 2017 month. Proper details are displayed on the invoice.
                 2] Now in the month of Oct 2017 I changed the billed rate value of Billed Rate rate to 400. Next I again edit the EE which I had enrolled in Venky Gold plan and change the coverage with effective date as 10/16/2017. Here only the 3rd child is added to the enrollment but the health tier id remains the same.
                 3] Now I generate the invoice for the month of Nov 2017. Here the details which are displayed have a missing record that is the new billed rate being charged for the Oct month. Only the returns of the old charged value is displayed. And also the new billed rate value charged for Nov 2017 are displayed.

            So as per my understanding there exists some issue. Please could you look into this and reassign this ticket once verified.

            [~prasanna],[~sachin.hingole],[~amita.sangani]

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh



                

            ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 09/Oct/17 10:20 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Testing on LB

            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jyoti Agrawal,

            This is tested on LB on For QA ASML company. The issue has been resolved for policy free in pay out only. Correct adjustments are displayed in the invoices.

            This is ready for Stage

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jyoti Agrawal , This is tested on LB on For QA ASML company. The issue has been resolved for policy free in pay out only. Correct adjustments are displayed in the invoices. This is ready for Stage Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 33.3h [ 119880 ] 35.3h [ 127080 ]
            Worklog Id 83856 [ 83856 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 09/Oct/17 01:23 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Scenario verification along with Venaktesh

            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Agrawal [ jyoti.agrawal ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 10/Oct/17 02:38 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Testing on Stage

            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 35.3h [ 127080 ] 36.3h [ 130680 ]
            Worklog Id 84223 [ 84223 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 12/Oct/17 12:57 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Testing on Stage

            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jyoti Agrawal,

            This is tested on Stage on AFI For Hspl company. The issue has been resolved for policy free in pay out only. Correct adjustments are displayed in the invoices.

            This is ready for Production

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jyoti Agrawal, This is tested on Stage on AFI For Hspl company. The issue has been resolved for policy free in pay out only. Correct adjustments are displayed in the invoices. This is ready for Production Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 36.3h [ 130680 ] 36.8h [ 132480 ]
            Worklog Id 84590 [ 84590 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 36.8h [ 132480 ] 38.8h [ 139680 ]
            Worklog Id 84945 [ 84945 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hi Kira Hamilton,

            The issue has been resolved and also tested on Production on COSB For Hspl company. The issue has been resolved for policy free in pay out only. Correct adjustments are displayed in the invoices. Please could you verify and close this ticket.

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Kira Hamilton , The issue has been resolved and also tested on Production on COSB For Hspl company. The issue has been resolved for policy free in pay out only. Correct adjustments are displayed in the invoices. Please could you verify and close this ticket. Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] Kira Hamilton [ kira.hamilton ]
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 14/Oct/17 10:58 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Testing on Production

            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 38.8h [ 139680 ] 39.8h [ 143280 ]
            Worklog Id 85087 [ 85087 ]
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            Hide
            Kira.Hamilton Kira Hamilton (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello,

            Per email received from Susan at BCC on 10/15/17 this ticket can be closed.

            Thank you,
            Kira Hamilton
            Debbie Kulling

            Show
            Kira.Hamilton Kira Hamilton (Inactive) added a comment - Hello, Per email received from Susan at BCC on 10/15/17 this ticket can be closed. Thank you, Kira Hamilton Debbie Kulling
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue causes WT-11691 [ WT-11691 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 39.8h [ 143280 ] 43.3h [ 155880 ]
            Worklog Id 86540 [ 86540 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is cloned by NF-5137 [ NF-5137 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            20h 52m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Reopen in Local
            8d 9h 3m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            Reopen in Local In Development
            2d 11h 4m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            4d 23h 20m 2
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            1d 4h 59m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            3d 21h 27m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            1m 17s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              Kira.Hamilton Kira Hamilton (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              Kira.Hamilton Kira Hamilton (Inactive)
              Account Executive:
              Debbie Kulling
              Developer:
              Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive)
              QA:
              Amita Sangani (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 43.3h
                  43.3h