Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-12462

Admin permissions dropped "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy"

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Platform
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      Platform - Security
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Company:
      ILG
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Must Have
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 41

      Description

      Hello,

      First noticed this morning In all ILG Admin permissions, the "Select User Access Policy" no longer shows "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy". Somehow that option has been removed not just as the selection but from the drop down options altogether. All Admin users are defaulted to "Select". Further research shows this has also affected MHR, Allegiant, City of San Marcos and Charley's. Please scan all clients in the database to see if any other clients that have been affected and provide a full list. For all clients that do not have "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy" please add it back in to the drop down and default all Admins with this permission.

      This is affecting Admin access so please tend to this issue as quickly as possible.

      Thank you,

      Veronica Blanco

      CC Robyn Adkison, Jennifer Johnson, Yamilka Coca, Nick, Debbie Kulling

        Attachments

        1. 12462TestCases.xls
          8 kB
        2. Company1.jpg
          Company1.jpg
          246 kB
        3. Company1 (8ed6b266-a006-44e1-8ae0-6cbd3015aae8).jpg
          Company1 (8ed6b266-a006-44e1-8ae0-6cbd3015aae8).jpg
          236 kB
        4. Company2.jpg
          Company2.jpg
          219 kB
        5. Company2AdminRights.jpg
          Company2AdminRights.jpg
          231 kB
        6. FW 1211 Sprint - Development Approval.msg
          51 kB
        7. ilg admin.PNG
          ilg admin.PNG
          118 kB
        8. ILGAdminUser.png
          ILGAdminUser.png
          108 kB
        9. Updated12462TestCases.xls
          9 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            veronica.blanco Veronica Blanco (Inactive) created issue -
            veronica.blanco Veronica Blanco (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Attachment ilg admin.PNG [ 68906 ]
            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) made changes -
            Description Hello,

            First noticed this morning In all ILG Admin permissions, the "Select User Access Policy" no longer shows "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy". Somehow that option has been removed not just as the selection but from the drop down options altogether. All Admin users are defaulted to "Select". Further research shows this has also affected MHR, Allegiant, City of San Marcos and Charley's. Please scan all clients in the database to see if any other clients that have been affected and provide a full list. For all clients that do not have "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy" please add it back in to the drop down and default all Admins with this permission.

            This is affecting Admin access so please tend to this issue as quickly as possible.

            Thank you,

            Veronica Blanco

            CC [~Robyn.Adkison], [~jjsassy99], [~Yamilka.Coca], [~nick], [~dkulling]
            Hello,

            First noticed this morning In all ILG Admin permissions, the "Select User Access Policy" no longer shows "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy". Somehow that option has been removed not just as the selection but from the drop down options altogether. All Admin users are defaulted to "Select". Further research shows this has also affected MHR, Allegiant, City of San Marcos and Charley's. Please scan all clients in the database to see if any other clients that have been affected and provide a full list. For all clients that do not have "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy" please add it back in to the drop down and default all Admins with this permission.

            This is affecting Admin access so please tend to this issue as quickly as possible.

            Thank you,

            Veronica Blanco

            CC [~Robyn.Adkison], [~jjsassy99], [~Yamilka.Coca], [~nick], [~dkulling], [~jennifer.leugers]
            veronica.blanco Veronica Blanco (Inactive) made changes -
            Bug Type Functional [ 15402 ]
            Description Hello,

            First noticed this morning In all ILG Admin permissions, the "Select User Access Policy" no longer shows "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy". Somehow that option has been removed not just as the selection but from the drop down options altogether. All Admin users are defaulted to "Select". Further research shows this has also affected MHR, Allegiant, City of San Marcos and Charley's. Please scan all clients in the database to see if any other clients that have been affected and provide a full list. For all clients that do not have "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy" please add it back in to the drop down and default all Admins with this permission.

            This is affecting Admin access so please tend to this issue as quickly as possible.

            Thank you,

            Veronica Blanco

            CC [~Robyn.Adkison], [~jjsassy99], [~Yamilka.Coca], [~nick], [~dkulling], [~jennifer.leugers]
            Hello,

            First noticed this morning In all ILG Admin permissions, the "Select User Access Policy" no longer shows "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy". Somehow that option has been removed not just as the selection but from the drop down options altogether. All Admin users are defaulted to "Select". Further research shows this has also affected MHR, Allegiant, City of San Marcos and Charley's. Please scan all clients in the database to see if any other clients that have been affected and provide a full list. For all clients that do not have "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy" please add it back in to the drop down and default all Admins with this permission.

            This is affecting Admin access so please tend to this issue as quickly as possible.

            Thank you,

            Veronica Blanco

            CC [~Robyn.Adkison], [~jjsassy99], [~Yamilka.Coca], [~nick], [~dkulling]
            Issue Importance Must Have [ 11800 ]
            samir Samir made changes -
            Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ]
            samir Samir made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Veronica Blanco,

            I have checked 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy'. This policy as of now mapped to 'BioRad' and 'Christie'. I think today someone added 'Christie' this policy but while doing that mapping of reset of the companies got deleted.
            Could you please send me list of all companies that are using this policy. I will update the policy accordingly.

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Veronica Blanco , I have checked 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy'. This policy as of now mapped to 'BioRad' and 'Christie'. I think today someone added 'Christie' this policy but while doing that mapping of reset of the companies got deleted. Could you please send me list of all companies that are using this policy. I will update the policy accordingly.
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Component/s Platform [ 10006 ]
            Component/s BenAdmin [ 10000 ]
            Developer Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ]
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100) Parent values: Platform(10106)Level 1 values: Security(10115)
            Remaining Estimate 4h [ 14400 ]
            Original Estimate 4h [ 14400 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ] Veronica Blanco [ veronica.blanco ]
            Hide
            Yamilka.Coca Yamilka Coca (Inactive) added a comment -

            Adding Client Service Managers to this ticket.

            Kevin Walker
            Deborah Larue
            Deborah Mascot

            Show
            Yamilka.Coca Yamilka Coca (Inactive) added a comment - Adding Client Service Managers to this ticket. Kevin Walker Deborah Larue Deborah Mascot
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment ILGAdminUser.png [ 68911 ]
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Veronica Blanco,

            as of now we have restored the company module mapping for all UHC companies. We have confirmed that user access policy is getting displayed correctly on screen. Could you please have someone log in to system and confirm.
            Please refer attached for more details.

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Veronica Blanco , as of now we have restored the company module mapping for all UHC companies. We have confirmed that user access policy is getting displayed correctly on screen. Could you please have someone log in to system and confirm. Please refer attached for more details.
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 30/Nov/17 05:13 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               
              <No comment>
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 4h [ 14400 ] 3h [ 10800 ]
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ]
            Worklog Id 94127 [ 94127 ]
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Here is list of clients using 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy'

            1. D C Taylor Co
            2. City of Denton
            3. Henny Penny
            4. QubicaAMF
            5. FDU
            6. RCPS
            7. GBAPS
            8. Suburban Electric
            9. UVU
            10. City of Baytown
            11. GFC
            12. OPERS
            13. SCC
            14. CSS
            15. GSM
            16. PSMC
            17. HPB
            18. Symphony
            19. City of San Marcos
            20. Rogers
            21. GIII
            22. Castleberry
            23. CPC
            24. Allegiant
            25. ACPS
            26. Dakotaland FCU
            27. Nexion
            28. Charleys
            29. Colts
            30. BioRad
            31. Nasco
            32. Virgin
            33. MAG
            34. DISYS
            35. The Packard Companies
            36. ILG
            37. Memorial Regional Health
            38. Christie
            39. Valiant
            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Here is list of clients using 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy' D C Taylor Co City of Denton Henny Penny QubicaAMF FDU RCPS GBAPS Suburban Electric UVU City of Baytown GFC OPERS SCC CSS GSM PSMC HPB Symphony City of San Marcos Rogers GIII Castleberry CPC Allegiant ACPS Dakotaland FCU Nexion Charleys Colts BioRad Nasco Virgin MAG DISYS The Packard Companies ILG Memorial Regional Health Christie Valiant
            Hide
            veronica.blanco Veronica Blanco (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello Jaideep Vinchurkar,

            Can you provide a list of companies in WT that do not have Admins set to 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy'?

            After pulling the report, can you please default all Admin users to 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy' so that we don't have to go into all accounts and update one by one?

            Will you also provide us with the 3 C's so we have an understanding of what occurred?

            Thank you,
            Veronica Blanco

            Show
            veronica.blanco Veronica Blanco (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Jaideep Vinchurkar , Can you provide a list of companies in WT that do not have Admins set to 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy'? After pulling the report, can you please default all Admin users to 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy' so that we don't have to go into all accounts and update one by one? Will you also provide us with the 3 C's so we have an understanding of what occurred? Thank you, Veronica Blanco
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Veronica Blanco,

            Do you want list of UHC companies that do not use 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy' for their admins?
            I have shared a list of companies above. But if you need list of companies out this list, you have to given me names of UHC companies. I do not have any means to find out UHC companies.

            We will provide 3C's but tomorrow our day team will be working over it.

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Veronica Blanco , Do you want list of UHC companies that do not use 'UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy' for their admins? I have shared a list of companies above. But if you need list of companies out this list, you have to given me names of UHC companies. I do not have any means to find out UHC companies. We will provide 3C's but tomorrow our day team will be working over it.
            Hide
            veronica.blanco Veronica Blanco (Inactive) added a comment -

            HI Jaideep Vinchurkar,

            I checked with Robyn Adkison and she believes the list you provided above is sufficient.

            Thank you,

            Veronica Blanco

            Show
            veronica.blanco Veronica Blanco (Inactive) added a comment - HI Jaideep Vinchurkar , I checked with Robyn Adkison and she believes the list you provided above is sufficient. Thank you, Veronica Blanco
            Hide
            satyap Satya added a comment -

            Hi Ashwin,

            As discussed, can you please share details on this?

            Regards,
            Satya Prakash

            Cc: Rakesh Roy Swapnil Pandhare Jaideep Vinchurkar Gaurav Sodani Samir

            Show
            satyap Satya added a comment - Hi Ashwin, As discussed, can you please share details on this? Regards, Satya Prakash Cc: Rakesh Roy Swapnil Pandhare Jaideep Vinchurkar Gaurav Sodani Samir
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Assignee Veronica Blanco [ veronica.blanco ] Ashwin Wankhede [ ashwin.wankhede ]
            Hide
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Veronica Blanco

            We are still investing the root cause . Our QA Team is trying to repro this on our local testing environment. We will update you soon on this.

            Show
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Veronica Blanco We are still investing the root cause . Our QA Team is trying to repro this on our local testing environment. We will update you soon on this.
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ashwin Wankhede [ ashwin.wankhede ] Rakesh Roy [ rakeshr ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Rakesh Roy [ rakeshr ] Hrishikesh Deshpande [ hrishikesh.deshpande ]
            Hide
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jaideep Vinchurkar / Ashwin Wankhede,

            This issue is getting reproduced by following below steps -

            1) Login with Partner who does not have rights of ILG company
            2) Go to User Access policy - "UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy"
            3) Go to Company Mapping Menu
            4) Give rights to available companies

            Now Observe that newly Selected Company got "UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy" in User Rights drop down and this policy got removed on ILG company users rights drop down.

            Let me know in case you need more details on this.

            Thanks,
            Hrishikesh.

            CC : Rakesh Roy Satya

            Show
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jaideep Vinchurkar / Ashwin Wankhede , This issue is getting reproduced by following below steps - 1) Login with Partner who does not have rights of ILG company 2) Go to User Access policy - "UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy" 3) Go to Company Mapping Menu 4) Give rights to available companies Now Observe that newly Selected Company got "UHC UMR - Admin Default Policy" in User Rights drop down and this policy got removed on ILG company users rights drop down. Let me know in case you need more details on this. Thanks, Hrishikesh. CC : Rakesh Roy Satya
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 3h [ 10800 ] 2.5h [ 9000 ]
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ] 1.5h [ 5400 ]
            Worklog Id 94518 [ 94518 ]
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Hrishikesh Deshpande [ hrishikesh.deshpande ] Satya [ ID10004 ]
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) logged work - 04/Dec/17 01:34 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               
              <No comment>
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 2.5h [ 9000 ] 1.5h [ 5400 ]
            Time Spent 1.5h [ 5400 ] 2.5h [ 9000 ]
            Worklog Id 94590 [ 94590 ]
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) logged work - 04/Dec/17 06:27 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               
              <No comment>
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ]
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Below are 3C's for this issue

            Concern: While updating company mapping for user access policy by partner long in, companies are getting dropped from mapping.

            Cause: As per the repro steps shared by QA, we got to know that when partner maps some company to policy, system wipe out all those companies from mapping for which the partner is not having access rights. This is because the way, this functionality is implemented. For any change in access policy-company mapping, we first delete current entries from DB and add new. In this case, new companies will only those companies that partner can access.

            Correction: We need to correct the logic to update / delete company mapping, to make sure that while updating no existing mapping get wiped out

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Below are 3C's for this issue Concern: While updating company mapping for user access policy by partner long in, companies are getting dropped from mapping. Cause: As per the repro steps shared by QA, we got to know that when partner maps some company to policy, system wipe out all those companies from mapping for which the partner is not having access rights. This is because the way, this functionality is implemented. For any change in access policy-company mapping, we first delete current entries from DB and add new. In this case, new companies will only those companies that partner can access. Correction: We need to correct the logic to update / delete company mapping, to make sure that while updating no existing mapping get wiped out
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Root Cause Bug [ 18430 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 05/Dec/17 03:16 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               
              <No comment>
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 1.5h [ 5400 ] 1h [ 3600 ]
            Time Spent 2.5h [ 9000 ] 3h [ 10800 ]
            Worklog Id 94784 [ 94784 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ] Akash Thakur [ akash.thakur ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 41 - Bugs [ 95 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 15/Dec/2017
            Dev Estimates 32
            Developer Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ] Akash Thakur [ akash.thakur ]
            Remaining Estimate 1h [ 3600 ] 33h [ 118800 ]
            Original Estimate 4h [ 14400 ] 36h [ 129600 ]
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            QA Hrishikesh Deshpande [ hrishikesh.deshpande ]
            QA Estimates 4
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Attaching the development approval email for your reference

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching the development approval email for your reference Regards Gaurav
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Approval status Approved for development [ 18453 ]
            Development Approval Yes [ 18474 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Stage Due Date 22/Dec/17 [ 2017-12-22 ]
            Hide
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Hrishikesh Deshpande,

            We have tried to re-produced this scenario on UI refresh & code-map the issue didn't reproduced we have have also tried it on local build for old UI .Please request you to verify this at your end .

            Thanks ,
            Akash Thakur

            Jaideep Vinchurkar

            Show
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Hrishikesh Deshpande , We have tried to re-produced this scenario on UI refresh & code-map the issue didn't reproduced we have have also tried it on local build for old UI .Please request you to verify this at your end . Thanks , Akash Thakur Jaideep Vinchurkar
            Yamilka.Coca Yamilka Coca (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Akash Thakur [ akash.thakur ] Yamilka Coca [ yamilka.coca ]
            Yamilka.Coca Yamilka Coca (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Yamilka Coca [ yamilka.coca ] Robyn Adkison [ robyn.adkison ]
            Hide
            Yamilka.Coca Yamilka Coca (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Robyn - I assigned the ticket to you, since the person who reported the issue has changed.

            Show
            Yamilka.Coca Yamilka Coca (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Robyn - I assigned the ticket to you, since the person who reported the issue has changed.
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Robyn Adkison [ robyn.adkison ] Hrishikesh Deshpande [ hrishikesh.deshpande ]
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) logged work - 12/Dec/17 07:03 AM
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               
              <No comment>
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 33h [ 118800 ] 27h [ 97200 ]
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ] 9h [ 32400 ]
            Worklog Id 95710 [ 95710 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) logged work - 12/Dec/17 11:24 AM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               
              <No comment>
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Hrishikesh Deshpande [ hrishikesh.deshpande ] Akash Thakur [ akash.thakur ]
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) logged work - 12/Dec/17 01:12 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Re-testing

            Hide
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Akash Thakur,

            This issue is getting reproduced, same has been shown to you on LB.
            Can you please plan development for issue?

            Thanks,
            Hrishikesh,

            CC : Jaideep Vinchurkar Gaurav Sodani

            Show
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Akash Thakur , This issue is getting reproduced, same has been shown to you on LB. Can you please plan development for issue? Thanks, Hrishikesh, CC : Jaideep Vinchurkar Gaurav Sodani
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 27h [ 97200 ] 26h [ 93600 ]
            Time Spent 9h [ 32400 ] 10h [ 36000 ]
            Worklog Id 95810 [ 95810 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 12/Dec/17 02:03 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               
              <No comment>
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 26h [ 93600 ] 25.5h [ 91800 ]
            Time Spent 10h [ 36000 ] 10.5h [ 37800 ]
            Worklog Id 95827 [ 95827 ]
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 25.5h [ 91800 ] 20.5h [ 73800 ]
            Time Spent 10.5h [ 37800 ] 15.5h [ 55800 ]
            Worklog Id 95925 [ 95925 ]
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) logged work - 13/Dec/17 02:14 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               
              <No comment>
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 20.5h [ 73800 ] 15.5h [ 55800 ]
            Time Spent 15.5h [ 55800 ] 20.5h [ 73800 ]
            Worklog Id 95981 [ 95981 ]
            mukund.patil Mukund Patil (Inactive) logged work - 13/Dec/17 05:49 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               
              • Helps Akash to prepare script
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) logged work - 14/Dec/17 09:38 AM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               
              <No comment>
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 15.5h [ 55800 ] 12.5h [ 45000 ]
            Time Spent 20.5h [ 73800 ] 23.5h [ 84600 ]
            Worklog Id 96100 [ 96100 ]
            Hide
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Hrishikesh Deshpande/Jayshree Nagpure,

            We have found the root cause for this issue. we have modified deletion logic ,the partner when maps any policy to his company he wont be able to wipe the mapping for same policy to other companies . thus resulting policy don't get removed from other company . we have checked-in the code on LB & will be up in next build please verify this at your end .

            Thanks ,
            Akash Thakur
            Jaideep Vinchurkar Gaurav Sodani Jayshree Nagpure

            Show
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Hrishikesh Deshpande / Jayshree Nagpure , We have found the root cause for this issue. we have modified deletion logic ,the partner when maps any policy to his company he wont be able to wipe the mapping for same policy to other companies . thus resulting policy don't get removed from other company . we have checked-in the code on LB & will be up in next build please verify this at your end . Thanks , Akash Thakur Jaideep Vinchurkar Gaurav Sodani Jayshree Nagpure
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 14/Dec/17 12:54 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              test case writting

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment 12462TestCases.xls [ 70066 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 12.5h [ 45000 ] 10.5h [ 37800 ]
            Time Spent 23.5h [ 84600 ] 25.5h [ 91800 ]
            Worklog Id 96181 [ 96181 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Akash Thakur [ akash.thakur ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 15/Dec/17 04:47 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Testing on LB

            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) logged work - 15/Dec/17 07:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Optimal solution finding

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Updated12462TestCases.xls [ 70267 ]
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Akash Thakur,

            Verified on LB
            Verified scenario are attached in Updated testcases

            Working fine

            PFA : Updated12462TestCases.xls

            Marking item state as ready for stage

            cc : Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Akash Thakur , Verified on LB Verified scenario are attached in Updated testcases Working fine PFA : Updated12462TestCases.xls Marking item state as ready for stage cc : Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 10.5h [ 37800 ] 7.5h [ 27000 ]
            Time Spent 25.5h [ 91800 ] 28.5h [ 102600 ]
            Worklog Id 96731 [ 96731 ]
            Hide
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) added a comment -

            relates to NF-5506 Development - In Progress
            Admin permissions dropped "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy"

            Show
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) added a comment - relates to NF-5506 Development - In Progress Admin permissions dropped "UHC/UMR Admin Rights Policy"
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to NF-5506 [ NF-5506 ]
            Hide
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) added a comment -

            hi Jayshree Nagpure,

            we have checked-in the code on Stage branch & will be up in next build please verify this at your end .

            Thanks,
            Akash Thakur

            Jaideep Vinchurkar Gaurav Sodani Hrishikesh Deshpande

            Show
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) added a comment - hi Jayshree Nagpure , we have checked-in the code on Stage branch & will be up in next build please verify this at your end . Thanks, Akash Thakur Jaideep Vinchurkar Gaurav Sodani Hrishikesh Deshpande
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 22/Dec/17 10:18 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Stage testing

            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            This ticket has been approved for stage deployment on 12/21/17.

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, This ticket has been approved for stage deployment on 12/21/17. Regards Gaurav
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Deployment Approval Approved for stage deployment [ 18455 ]
            Production Due Date 29/Dec/2017
            mukund.patil Mukund Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 7.5h [ 27000 ] 5.5h [ 19800 ]
            Time Spent 28.5h [ 102600 ] 30.5h [ 109800 ]
            Worklog Id 97699 [ 97699 ]
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on Stage.

            Verified attached Updated test cases
            Working fine..

            Marking item state as Ready for production

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Hrishikesh Deshpande

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Stage. Verified attached Updated test cases Working fine.. Marking item state as Ready for production Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Hrishikesh Deshpande
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Company2AdminRights.jpg [ 70736 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Company1.jpg [ 70737 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 5.5h [ 19800 ] 4h [ 14400 ]
            Time Spent 30.5h [ 109800 ] 32h [ 115200 ]
            Worklog Id 97794 [ 97794 ]
            akash.thakur Akash Thakur (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 4h [ 14400 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 32h [ 115200 ] 36h [ 129600 ]
            Worklog Id 98415 [ 98415 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Comments Hi All,

            Following point has been approved for production deployment on 12/29

            Regards
            Gaurav
            Deployment Approval Approved for stage deployment [ 18455 ] Approved for production deployment [ 18457 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 29/Dec/17 11:13 AM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Production testing

            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on Production
            Verified attached Updated test cases
            Working fine..
            Marking item state as production complete

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Production Verified attached Updated test cases Working fine.. Marking item state as production complete
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Company2.jpg [ 70991 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 36h [ 129600 ] 39h [ 140400 ]
            Worklog Id 98746 [ 98746 ]
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference Regards Gaurav
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Samir made transition -
            Open In Development
            1m 52s 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            14d 16h 6m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            7d 10m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            6d 22h 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            4h 59m 1
            Prasad Pise (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            82d 23h 47m 1

              People

              Assignee:
              jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              veronica.blanco Veronica Blanco (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Akash Thakur (Inactive)
              QA:
              Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              10 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 36h Original Estimate - 36h
                  36h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 39h
                  39h