Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-12723

The Packard Companies - Billing details report - Enrollment coverage count field

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Production Complete
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Report
    • Reported by:
      Implementation
    • Company:
      The Packard Companies
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 41

      Description

      Hi,
      There is a field in the Billing details report that we can pull in called "Enrollment Coverage Count". Could you please let us know what that field is supposed to show? In the Packard Companies client, there is a template named "Packard Billing Details". there are people who are showing up with numbers from 1 - 6. What do these numbers represent? I don't know if this template is corrupted or not.

      I've tried creating a new report with the same parameters, and on the new report, the value in this field is showing "0". Which number is correct? Is this a field that is currently functional? Please let us know what this field should contain.

      Example: Aaron Taylor - on the template for Basic life, his number shows as "2"
      On a newly created report, his number shows a "0"

      Thank you,
      Robyn

      CC: Amannda Johnson; Ashley Marra, Sonja Burns, Jackie Sivigny, Gayle Smelansky

        Attachments

        1. EE count.png
          EE count.png
          80 kB
        2. FW Hot Fix and Development Approval Request.msg
          74 kB
        3. New report.PNG
          New report.PNG
          9 kB
        4. screenshot-1.png
          screenshot-1.png
          10 kB
        5. Template.PNG
          Template.PNG
          8 kB
        6. WT-12723- Issue and implementation Approach.xls
          9 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) created issue -
            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Attachment New report.PNG [ 69625 ]
            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Template.PNG [ 69626 ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Prasad Patil [ prasad.patil ]
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment EE count.png [ 69668 ]
            Hide
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Prasanna Karlekar,

            Verified this issue for EE 'Aaron Taylor'. Already created Billing details report named 'Packard Billing Details' shows coverage count '2' for plan 'Basic life and AD&D' and when new report is created with the same date range and other details, coverage count is '0'

            The confirmation statement of EE 'Aaron Taylor' for plan 'Basic life and AD&D' shows coverage count as '1' in both current and future enrollment summary.

            (Please refer the screen shot below)

            Request you to please look into this.
            Thank you,
            ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Satya

            Show
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Prasanna Karlekar , Verified this issue for EE ' Aaron Taylor '. Already created Billing details report named ' Packard Billing Details ' shows coverage count ' 2 ' for plan 'Basic life and AD&D' and when new report is created with the same date range and other details, coverage count is '0' The confirmation statement of EE ' Aaron Taylor ' for plan ' Basic life and AD&D ' shows coverage count as '1' in both current and future enrollment summary. (Please refer the screen shot below) Request you to please look into this. Thank you, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Satya
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasad Patil [ prasad.patil ] Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) logged work - 08/Dec/17 12:12 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              analysis and issue verfication.

            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ]
            Worklog Id 95345 [ 95345 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ] Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ]
            Hide
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Verified mentioned issue and below are the 3Cs:

            Concern: Enrollment coverage count mismatch on confirmation statement and Billing report

            Cause: There was two problems due which leads Enrollment coverage count mismatch on confirmation statement and Billing report.
            1. Incorrect grouping was there because currently we are storing data into two tables (i.e. main table and Intermediate table) but while calculate count we have done grouping on Enrollment Id but it should be as Enrollment Id and Intermediate flag.
            2. Enrollment coverage count value appearing as zero when there is no enrollment fields selected (i.e. Enrollment effective date, termination date, etc.) in display fields along with Enrollment coverage count. Because we were checking flag before update enrollment coverage count in temporary table.

            Correction:
            1. Now while grouping we have considered Intermediate flag so it will show correct values of count.
            2. Removed condition of enrollment fields before update enrollment coverage count into temporary table. So when we select enrollment count it will not be depend on enrollment fields.

            Affected Areas: Billing Report (i.e. With and without Demographics)

            Affected Files:
            OES_SP_GetBillingDetailsMonthly
            OES_SP_GetBillingDetailsMonthly_Demographics

            Tested Scenarios:
            1. Check billing type both (i.e. With and without Demographics) reports
            2. Compare enrollment coverage count on confirmation statement and billing details report.

            Note: We have resolved above issues on The Packard Companies only. This will get deployed on all other companies through our process.

            Prasad Patil, Could you please verify above changes on The Packard Companies company?

            CC: Prasanna Karlekar Mandar KulkarniGaurav Sodani Satya

            Show
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Verified mentioned issue and below are the 3Cs : Concern : Enrollment coverage count mismatch on confirmation statement and Billing report Cause : There was two problems due which leads Enrollment coverage count mismatch on confirmation statement and Billing report. 1. Incorrect grouping was there because currently we are storing data into two tables (i.e. main table and Intermediate table) but while calculate count we have done grouping on Enrollment Id but it should be as Enrollment Id and Intermediate flag. 2. Enrollment coverage count value appearing as zero when there is no enrollment fields selected (i.e. Enrollment effective date, termination date, etc.) in display fields along with Enrollment coverage count. Because we were checking flag before update enrollment coverage count in temporary table. Correction : 1. Now while grouping we have considered Intermediate flag so it will show correct values of count. 2. Removed condition of enrollment fields before update enrollment coverage count into temporary table. So when we select enrollment count it will not be depend on enrollment fields. Affected Areas : Billing Report (i.e. With and without Demographics) Affected Files : OES_SP_GetBillingDetailsMonthly OES_SP_GetBillingDetailsMonthly_Demographics Tested Scenarios : 1. Check billing type both (i.e. With and without Demographics) reports 2. Compare enrollment coverage count on confirmation statement and billing details report. Note: We have resolved above issues on The Packard Companies only. This will get deployed on all other companies through our process. Prasad Patil , Could you please verify above changes on The Packard Companies company? CC: Prasanna Karlekar Mandar Kulkarni Gaurav Sodani Satya
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Issue Type Support Activity [ 10301 ] Bug [ 1 ]
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            Support Task Type Query Resolution [ 11205 ]
            Workflow WT_Support [ 59837 ] WT_Defects [ 59916 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ] Prasad Patil [ prasad.patil ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 11/Dec/17 10:37 AM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Discussion with Prasad
              Issue analysis and Fix on one company
              JIRA update

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ] 5h [ 18000 ]
            Worklog Id 95575 [ 95575 ]
            Hide
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Robyn Adkison,

            Enrollment Coverage Count is the field which represents the count of members enrolled in a particular plan. If only EE is enrolled in the plan, the Enrollment Coverage Count will be '1'. If EE and Spouse are enrolled in a plan count will be '2' and so on.

            EE 'Aaron Taylor' was the only one enrolled in the 'Basic life and AD&D' so his count should be '1'.

            As mentioned in above comment, correction is made for this issue. We have verified the reports of type 'Billing Details' and 'Enrollment' at our end and they are working fine.

            Request you to please check this at your end and let us know for any issues.
            Thank you,
            -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Satya, Prasanna Karlekar, [~parmeshwar.jumbade]

            Show
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Robyn Adkison , Enrollment Coverage Count is the field which represents the count of members enrolled in a particular plan. If only EE is enrolled in the plan, the Enrollment Coverage Count will be '1'. If EE and Spouse are enrolled in a plan count will be '2' and so on. EE 'Aaron Taylor' was the only one enrolled in the 'Basic life and AD&D' so his count should be '1'. As mentioned in above comment, correction is made for this issue. We have verified the reports of type 'Billing Details' and 'Enrollment' at our end and they are working fine. Request you to please check this at your end and let us know for any issues. Thank you, ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Satya , Prasanna Karlekar , [~parmeshwar.jumbade]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasad Patil [ prasad.patil ] Robyn Adkison [ robyn.adkison ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) logged work - 11/Dec/17 12:44 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Analysis and discussion with Parmeshwar. Verifying the resolution.

            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 5h [ 18000 ] 6h [ 21600 ]
            Worklog Id 95644 [ 95644 ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Root Cause Scenario/Requirement Missed [ 18432 ]
            Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ] Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Status Closed [ 6 ] Reopen in Production [ 10027 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Status Reopen in Production [ 10027 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207)
            Hide
            satyap Satya added a comment -

            Hi Parmeshwar,

            Re-opening this ticket, since after deploying fix for all companies, it would be marked production complete.

            For Packard company - correction has been completed.
            Regards,
            Satya Prakash

            Cc: Gaurav Sodani Prasanna Karlekar Jaideep Vinchurkar

            Show
            satyap Satya added a comment - Hi Parmeshwar, Re-opening this ticket, since after deploying fix for all companies, it would be marked production complete. For Packard company - correction has been completed. Regards, Satya Prakash Cc: Gaurav Sodani Prasanna Karlekar Jaideep Vinchurkar
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Assignee Robyn Adkison [ robyn.adkison ] Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ]
            Hide
            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) added a comment -

            Thank you Prasad Patil for the explanation. We'll take a look at the file for packard and let you know if we have any additional questions.

            Show
            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) added a comment - Thank you Prasad Patil for the explanation. We'll take a look at the file for packard and let you know if we have any additional questions.
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Development Approval No [ 18473 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Hide
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Gaurav Sodani,

            Have attached WT-12723- Issue and implementation Approach.xls file for deployment approval. This file include all details (i.e. issues, current implementation, Bug Resolution Approach and etc.).

            Please check and let us know if need more details.

            CC: Prasanna Karlekar Satya Samir

            Show
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Gaurav Sodani , Have attached WT-12723- Issue and implementation Approach.xls file for deployment approval. This file include all details (i.e. issues, current implementation, Bug Resolution Approach and etc.). Please check and let us know if need more details. CC: Prasanna Karlekar Satya Samir
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Attaching development approval email for reference: Unable to embed resource: FW Hot Fix and Development Approval Request.msg of type application/octet-stream

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching development approval email for reference: Unable to embed resource: FW Hot Fix and Development Approval Request.msg of type application/octet-stream Regards Gaurav
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Development Approval No [ 18473 ] Yes [ 18474 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Labels Billing
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Bug Type Functional [ 15402 ]
            Sprint WT Sprint 41 [ 95 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ] Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is cloned by WT-12856 [ WT-12856 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Stage Due Date 22/Dec/17 [ 2017-12-22 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT-12723.ods [ 70584 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT-12723.ods [ 70584 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT-12723.ods [ 70585 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT-12723.ods [ 70585 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 21/Dec/17 10:39 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               
              <No comment>
            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi [~parmeshwar.jumbade],

            I have tested this issue on LB on For QA Caiso For Hspl company. It is working fine as expected. This is ready for Stage.

            Sachin Hingole,Prasanna Karlekar,Hrishikesh Deshpande

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , I have tested this issue on LB on For QA Caiso For Hspl company. It is working fine as expected. This is ready for Stage. Sachin Hingole , Prasanna Karlekar , Hrishikesh Deshpande Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 6h [ 21600 ] 6.5h [ 23400 ]
            Worklog Id 97330 [ 97330 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            Hide
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified this issue on Stage and observed that it's working as expected. Hence marking ready for Production.

            Mahendra

            Show
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified this issue on Stage and observed that it's working as expected. Hence marking ready for Production. Mahendra
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) logged work - 22/Dec/17 11:26 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Bug testing on Stage

            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            This ticket has been approved for stage deployment on 12/21/17.

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, This ticket has been approved for stage deployment on 12/21/17. Regards Gaurav
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Deployment Approval Approved for stage deployment [ 18455 ]
            Production Due Date 29/Dec/2017
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Comments Hi All,

            Following point has been approved for production deployment on 12/29

            Regards
            Gaurav
            Deployment Approval Approved for stage deployment [ 18455 ] Approved for production deployment [ 18457 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Robyn Adkison,

            The issue has been resolved and also tested on Production. Please could you verify and close this ticket.

            Sachin Hingole,Prasanna Karlekar,[~parmeshwar.jumbade]

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Robyn Adkison , The issue has been resolved and also tested on Production. Please could you verify and close this ticket. Sachin Hingole , Prasanna Karlekar , [~parmeshwar.jumbade] Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] Robyn Adkison [ robyn.adkison ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 6.5h [ 23400 ] 7.5h [ 27000 ]
            Worklog Id 98774 [ 98774 ]
            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment screenshot-1.png [ 71044 ]
            Hide
            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Venkatesh Pujari,
            I ran a billing details for packard for 2/1/18 and I am seeing that the counts are still not matching what the enrollment counts are.
            For instance, Amy Alpaugh is showing 1, however, her coverage tier is EE +SP + CH so I would expect her count to be 3.
            Denise Huerta is showing EE only, however, her count is showing 3.

            Thanks,
            Robyn

            Show
            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Venkatesh Pujari , I ran a billing details for packard for 2/1/18 and I am seeing that the counts are still not matching what the enrollment counts are. For instance, Amy Alpaugh is showing 1, however, her coverage tier is EE +SP + CH so I would expect her count to be 3. Denise Huerta is showing EE only, however, her count is showing 3. Thanks, Robyn
            Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Robyn Adkison [ robyn.adkison ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Robyn Adkison,

            We have verified this on our end observed that the count is matching as per the members enrolled in a plan for an Employee. Please could you send us the report details(From Date,To Date,Plan selection and field selections ) for which you are facing this issue.

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Robyn Adkison , We have verified this on our end observed that the count is matching as per the members enrolled in a plan for an Employee. Please could you send us the report details(From Date,To Date,Plan selection and field selections ) for which you are facing this issue. Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] Robyn Adkison [ robyn.adkison ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 7.5h [ 27000 ] 8h [ 28800 ]
            Worklog Id 98999 [ 98999 ]
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference Regards Gaurav
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 02/Jan/18 05:14 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               
              <No comment>
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Prasad Patil (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Progress
            2h 11m 1
            Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made transition -
            In Progress In Development
            3d 4h 10m 1
            Satya made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            20h 36m 1
            Satya made transition -
            Closed Reopen in Production
            9s 1
            Satya made transition -
            Reopen in Production In Development
            4s 1
            Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            8d 3h 42m 2
            Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            1d 23h 33m 2
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            6d 21h 14m 2
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            1h 17m 2

              People

              Assignee:
              Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              Robyn.Adkison Robyn Adkison (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 8h
                  8h