Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-1764

Processing sequence of on 1G should be before 1F

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production QA - Re-open

      Description

      As per discussion with Nandkumar and further analysis, sequence of 1F and 1G is to be interchanged.

        Attachments

          Activity

          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) created issue -
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Files Affected:

          01_DDL/32_WT1764_WTB_ACA_MODTABLE_ACA_1095CCodes.sql
          04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Get_ACAIRS1095CData.StoredProcedure.sql

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Files Affected: 01_DDL/32_WT1764_WTB_ACA_MODTABLE_ACA_1095CCodes.sql 04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Get_ACAIRS1095CData.StoredProcedure.sql
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

          Please verify this change.

          Create a scenario where employee was eligible for both 1F and 1G codes (plans).
          Employee should now get 1G code instead of 1F.
          1G will be preferred now instead of 1F

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Please verify this change. Create a scenario where employee was eligible for both 1F and 1G codes (plans). Employee should now get 1G code instead of 1F. 1G will be preferred now instead of 1F
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)
          Hide
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

          Ramya Tantry
          Need 3 C's

          Show
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Ramya Tantry Need 3 C's
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

          Rakesh Roy Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar

          Concern: Processing sequence of on 1G should be before 1F
          Cause: If employee has more than one eligible plans which results in 1F and 1G codes,1F code gets populated as per priority.1G should be populated in this case because 1F shows that employee did not have a MV plan while 1G depicts MV and MEC plan.
          Correction: We have changed the priority of the 1F and 1G codes.

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Rakesh Roy Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar Concern : Processing sequence of on 1G should be before 1F Cause : If employee has more than one eligible plans which results in 1F and 1G codes,1F code gets populated as per priority.1G should be populated in this case because 1F shows that employee did not have a MV plan while 1G depicts MV and MEC plan. Correction : We have changed the priority of the 1F and 1G codes.
          sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
          Hide
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          changes made to plan design eligibility where not getting updated in DemographicCriteria column of Plan design.

          Hence could not test this ticket further,

          Show
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - changes made to plan design eligibility where not getting updated in DemographicCriteria column of Plan design. Hence could not test this ticket further,
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211)
          Hide
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          Testing of this issue is blocked due to Jira 1807. Once Jira 1807 will get deployed on LB.
          We will test same

          Show
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Testing of this issue is blocked due to Jira 1807. Once Jira 1807 will get deployed on LB. We will test same
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

          Deployed to stage with stage build.Please verify this on stage

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Deployed to stage with stage build.Please verify this on stage
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

          Deployed to production with Production build.

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Deployed to production with Production build.
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: On Hold(10219)
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ]
          Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Reopen in Production [ 10027 ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: On Hold(10219) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Re-open(10220)
          Show
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Ramya Tantry Smita Pawar Is this Re-open? Sachin Hingole Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
          Hide
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          FYI,
          Rakesh Roy,Sachin Hingole,Ramya Tantry,Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar.

          Testing of this ticket is pending from our side and will get completed by today, July 04/2016.

          Show
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - FYI, Rakesh Roy , Sachin Hingole , Ramya Tantry , Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar . Testing of this ticket is pending from our side and will get completed by today, July 04/2016.
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Reopen in Production [ 10027 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          Hide
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          We have verified above mentioned issue on Stage and Production its working fine.
          Received 1G code when employee was eligible for both plans.
          Attaching screen shot for additional information

          Show
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on Stage and Production its working fine. Received 1G code when employee was eligible for both plans. Attaching screen shot for additional information
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment !G.png [ 21230 ]
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ] Fixed [ 1 ]
          Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made transition -
          Open In Development
          1h 22m 1
          Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
          In LB Testing Reopen in Local
          18h 59m 1
          Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made transition -
          Reopen in Local In Development
          22d 5h 59m 1
          Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
          In Production Testing Reopen in Production
          45d 19h 21m 1
          Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
          Reopen in Production In Development
          13d 22h 42m 1
          Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
          In Development In LB Testing
          1h 31m 3
          Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
          In LB Testing Stage Testing
          6s 2
          Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
          Stage Testing In Production Testing
          1d 22h 36m 2
          Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
          In Production Testing Production Complete
          12s 1
          Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
          Production Complete Closed
          3s 1

            People

            Assignee:
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: