Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-1764

Processing sequence of on 1G should be before 1F

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production QA - Re-open

      Description

      As per discussion with Nandkumar and further analysis, sequence of 1F and 1G is to be interchanged.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Files Affected:

          01_DDL/32_WT1764_WTB_ACA_MODTABLE_ACA_1095CCodes.sql
          04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Get_ACAIRS1095CData.StoredProcedure.sql

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Files Affected: 01_DDL/32_WT1764_WTB_ACA_MODTABLE_ACA_1095CCodes.sql 04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Get_ACAIRS1095CData.StoredProcedure.sql
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

          Please verify this change.

          Create a scenario where employee was eligible for both 1F and 1G codes (plans).
          Employee should now get 1G code instead of 1F.
          1G will be preferred now instead of 1F

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Please verify this change. Create a scenario where employee was eligible for both 1F and 1G codes (plans). Employee should now get 1G code instead of 1F. 1G will be preferred now instead of 1F
          Hide
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

          Ramya Tantry
          Need 3 C's

          Show
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Ramya Tantry Need 3 C's
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

          Rakesh Roy Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar

          Concern: Processing sequence of on 1G should be before 1F
          Cause: If employee has more than one eligible plans which results in 1F and 1G codes,1F code gets populated as per priority.1G should be populated in this case because 1F shows that employee did not have a MV plan while 1G depicts MV and MEC plan.
          Correction: We have changed the priority of the 1F and 1G codes.

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Rakesh Roy Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar Concern : Processing sequence of on 1G should be before 1F Cause : If employee has more than one eligible plans which results in 1F and 1G codes,1F code gets populated as per priority.1G should be populated in this case because 1F shows that employee did not have a MV plan while 1G depicts MV and MEC plan. Correction : We have changed the priority of the 1F and 1G codes.
          Hide
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          changes made to plan design eligibility where not getting updated in DemographicCriteria column of Plan design.

          Hence could not test this ticket further,

          Show
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - changes made to plan design eligibility where not getting updated in DemographicCriteria column of Plan design. Hence could not test this ticket further,
          Hide
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          Testing of this issue is blocked due to Jira 1807. Once Jira 1807 will get deployed on LB.
          We will test same

          Show
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Testing of this issue is blocked due to Jira 1807. Once Jira 1807 will get deployed on LB. We will test same
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

          Deployed to stage with stage build.Please verify this on stage

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Deployed to stage with stage build.Please verify this on stage
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

          Deployed to production with Production build.

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Deployed to production with Production build.
          Show
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Ramya Tantry Smita Pawar Is this Re-open? Sachin Hingole Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
          Hide
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          FYI,
          Rakesh Roy,Sachin Hingole,Ramya Tantry,Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar.

          Testing of this ticket is pending from our side and will get completed by today, July 04/2016.

          Show
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - FYI, Rakesh Roy , Sachin Hingole , Ramya Tantry , Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar . Testing of this ticket is pending from our side and will get completed by today, July 04/2016.
          Hide
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          We have verified above mentioned issue on Stage and Production its working fine.
          Received 1G code when employee was eligible for both plans.
          Attaching screen shot for additional information

          Show
          smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on Stage and Production its working fine. Received 1G code when employee was eligible for both plans. Attaching screen shot for additional information

            People

            Assignee:
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: