Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-2139

Total Payer Count reported does not equal number of Payer Records in file

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Module:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      Step:-
      1.Login to application
      2.Create 1095C and 1094C (Finalize latest run)
      3.Navigate to BenAdmin > Reports > IRS Submission
      4.Click on Add IRS Submission
      5.Fill all details and click on Verify Submission data
      6.Application generate XML and Manifest
      7.Log out from application and log in to IRS
      8.Upload files to IRS and take Receipt ID
      9.IRS return status - Accepted
      10.Log in to Workterra
      11.Update UI submission with Receipt ID and status in Workterra
      12.Now Update Employee First Name and Company Name in application
      13.Due to change in First Name and Company Name , re run the 1095 and 1094C
      (Select Form status - Corrected and latest Run - Finalize )
      14.Navigate to BenAdmin> Reports > IRS submission
      15.Edit UI submission , select Transmission Type - User Correction and click on Verify Submission data
      16.Application generate new XML and Manifest

      Actual - Total Payer Count reported does not equal number of Payer Records in file

      Expected - Total Payer Count reported should equal number of Payer Records in file

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) created issue -
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Summary otal Payer Count reported does not equal number of Payer Records in file Total Payer Count reported does not equal number of Payer Records in file
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment ReceiptDT_AcceptedWithError.jpg [ 16461 ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is caused by WT-1771 [ WT-1771 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Hide
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment -

            Kumar Chhajed Ramya Tantry Yogesh Chaudhari Abhijeet Khandagale

            Hi Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,

            Scenario:
            Correction In : 1094+1095 [C]

            Expected elements to be populated in request file as
            <1094>Full Information</1094>
            <1094>Part I Info<1095>Employee's 1095 </1095></1094>


            Actual Payer is only one but due to populating 1094 twice, its expecting that count should be two. As reported by IRS like this & came to know on submitting to IRS portal ; but there is no such precisely described in the CRG file we were not implemented.
            Even though on reported error basis this will be changed counting functionality on receiving your feedback to implement.

            Thanks,
            Revan

            Show
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) added a comment - Kumar Chhajed Ramya Tantry Yogesh Chaudhari Abhijeet Khandagale Hi Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Scenario: Correction In : 1094+1095 [C] Expected elements to be populated in request file as <1094>Full Information</1094> <1094>Part I Info<1095>Employee's 1095 </1095></1094> Actual Payer is only one but due to populating 1094 twice, its expecting that count should be two. As reported by IRS like this & came to know on submitting to IRS portal ; but there is no such precisely described in the CRG file we were not implemented. Even though on reported error basis this will be changed counting functionality on receiving your feedback to implement. Thanks, Revan
            Hide
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -


            Yes, Revan this is the new thing we know about. Lets implement the the 1094c current count.

            Show
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Yes, Revan this is the new thing we know about. Lets implement the the 1094c current count.
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ] Mahendra Mungase [ mahendra.mungase ]
            Component/s ACA [ 10004 ]
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Environment LB [ 10800 ] Stage [ 10004 ]
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Environment Stage [ 10004 ] Production [ 10005 ]
            Hide
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have regressed this issue on LB - City of Redding For HSPL and observed that issue does not exist on LB.

            Below are verified Scenario

            • Create two 1094C without ALE
            • Create two 1094C with one ALE
            • Create single 1094C without ALE;create UI submission and Update UI submission with adding additional 1094C
            Show
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment - We have regressed this issue on LB - City of Redding For HSPL and observed that issue does not exist on LB. Below are verified Scenario Create two 1094C without ALE Create two 1094C with one ALE Create single 1094C without ALE;create UI submission and Update UI submission with adding additional 1094C
            Hide
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have regressed this issue on Stage - ACA Demo and observed that issue does not exist on Stage.

            Below are verified Scenario

            Create two 1094C without ALE
            Create two 1094C with one ALE
            Create single 1094C without ALE;create UI submission and Update UI submission with adding additional 1094C

            Show
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment - We have regressed this issue on Stage - ACA Demo and observed that issue does not exist on Stage. Below are verified Scenario Create two 1094C without ALE Create two 1094C with one ALE Create single 1094C without ALE;create UI submission and Update UI submission with adding additional 1094C
            Hide
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have regressed this issue on Production - County of Del Norte For HSPL and observed that issue does not exist on Production.

            Below are verified Scenario

            Create two 1094C without ALE
            Create two 1094C with one ALE
            Create single 1094C without ALE;create UI submission and Update UI submission with adding additional 1094C

            Show
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment - We have regressed this issue on Production - County of Del Norte For HSPL and observed that issue does not exist on Production. Below are verified Scenario Create two 1094C without ALE Create two 1094C with one ALE Create single 1094C without ALE;create UI submission and Update UI submission with adding additional 1094C
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ] Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            1d 3h 6m 1
            Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            7m 49s 1
            Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            34d 19m 1
            Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            3s 1
            Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            8s 1
            Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            2s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive)
              QA:
              Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: