-
Type:
Support Activity
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Critical
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ACA
-
Labels:None
-
Support Task Type:ACA IRS Submission
-
Reported by:Support
-
Module:ACA
Hi all -
Davis Moore Automotive has multiple EINs and the one for Lincoln looks incorrect (I haven't reviewed the others).
For the month of January, there are 27 full-time employees. Of those 27, four are a 1H. Of those four, two are 2A and two are 2D. I believe we are supposed to not count either of these so not sure why it is showing a No on their forms?
I've attached what they feel their 1094C forms should be.
Please review and provide a response as to why January is checked as No. Please also review the others to ensure they are correct.
Thanks,
Jen
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment | 1094-C_Davis-Moore_corrected 6.21.2016.pdf [ 20347 ] |
| Assignee | Vijay Siddha [ vijays ] | Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] |
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made changes -
| Assignee | Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] | Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] |
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
made changes -
| Assignee | Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] | Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] |
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | Resolved [ 5 ] |
Hi all - I thought Nandu was going to get back to us on this right after our call. We didn't hear anything and the client is pretty upset they haven't gotten feedback. Need this reviewed ASAP.
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | Resolved [ 5 ] | Reopened [ 4 ] |
Hi Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar, please check last comments from Jennifer Leugers
CC: Vijay Siddha, Satya
| Assignee | Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] | Nandkumar [ satyap ] |
| Attachment | DMA.png [ 20577 ] |
This employee's changes the Employer [EIN] from 7/21/2015 so this employee is not employed at this employer.
ZACHARY CADY see the attached image foe the same
All othere employees are terminated
Michael Cook
TINADILLON
SOURYADETH SANANIKONE
COLTON STANDRICH
CINTHIA SUMMERS
Nandu - thank you. Very helpful.
Hi all - the client is saying employee Aaron Mursch was employed under Investments so they feel they should have part III checked as yes. Could you please check into this and help identify what EIN he was in? Thanks.
Jennifer Leugers Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
Employee Aaron Mursch belongs to below classes.
Class1 - Eligible
Class2 - 0100-Automotive Non-Tobacco User
Yogesh Chaudhari (Inactive)
added a comment - Jennifer Leugers Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
Employee Aaron Mursch belongs to below classes.
Class1 - Eligible
Class2 - 0100-Automotive Non-Tobacco User Yogesh Chaudhari (Inactive)
made changes -
| Assignee | Nandkumar [ satyap ] | Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] |
He didn't get moved to that class until 2016. He was in Fiat in 2015 which is Investments.
| Assignee | Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] | Yogesh Chaudhari [ yogesh.chaudhari ] |
Hello Yogesh.
Could we please get an update on this? The client really needs this corrected to we can send him the IRS file.
Thanks
Kevin
| Component/s | ACA [ 10004 ] |
FYI Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Sachin Hingole,Yogesh Chaudhari
We have removed the employee Aaron Mursch from "1095-C Davis-Moore Automotive Inc" report and added to "1095-C Davis-Moore Investments Inc" report. We have re run both the reports. Please download and verify latest run dated "06/28/2016"
A mentioned in earlier comment that client wants Part 3 checked as yes,we have marked Part 3 for all 12 months. and changed line16 code to 2C for all 12 months. As the employee is not enrolled in any ACA plan,he was getting 2H.But since we have to show part 3 marked,we changed it to 2C.
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - Kevin Walker , Jennifer Leugers
FYI Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Sachin Hingole , Yogesh Chaudhari
We have removed the employee Aaron Mursch from "1095-C Davis-Moore Automotive Inc" report and added to "1095-C Davis-Moore Investments Inc" report. We have re run both the reports. Please download and verify latest run dated "06/28/2016"
A mentioned in earlier comment that client wants Part 3 checked as yes,we have marked Part 3 for all 12 months. and changed line16 code to 2C for all 12 months. As the employee is not enrolled in any ACA plan,he was getting 2H.But since we have to show part 3 marked,we changed it to 2C. Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
made changes -
| Assignee | Yogesh Chaudhari [ yogesh.chaudhari ] | Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] |
Jennifer LeugersKevin Walker Is there anything pending from our side?
| Assignee | Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] | Sonali Punse [ sonali.punse ] |
| Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] | |
| Status | Reopened [ 4 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
| Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times |
|---|
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
1d 8h 41m | 1 |
|
12h 10m | 1 |
|
11d 22h 25m | 1 |
Jennifer Leugers
FYI Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Sachin Hingole
Please verify with latest run of all 1094C reports.
For DMA Investments 1094C,for the last 3 months,Total employee count is 0. As there are no Employees,so no offers are present in these months.So MEC is kept as blank for last 3 months.