Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-3842

Partner does not have access to that company which is created by her using clone company

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Production Complete
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Platform
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      Platform
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Must Have

      Description

      Partner does not have access to that company which is created by her using clone company

      Steps:-
      Login as partner - >Clone company(assumption has right to this menu)->Clone company entering mandatory field -> After cloning company that company is not able to see that company in her list

      Expected ->Cloned company should be listed under her company list.

        Attachments

          Activity

          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) created issue -
          Hide
          chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) added a comment -

          Concern:
          Partner does not have access to that company which is created by it using clone company

          Cause:
          The condition was not handled to show cloned company for Partner

          Correction:
          We have made code changes so that now Partner can view the cloned companies

          Risk Mitigation:
          We have handled the condition for Partner to avoid this issue.

          Show
          chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) added a comment - Concern: Partner does not have access to that company which is created by it using clone company Cause: The condition was not handled to show cloned company for Partner Correction: We have made code changes so that now Partner can view the cloned companies Risk Mitigation: We have handled the condition for Partner to avoid this issue.
          Hide
          chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) added a comment -

          Files Affected:
          1)CloneCompanyModel.cs
          2)Company.vb

          Show
          chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) added a comment - Files Affected: 1)CloneCompanyModel.cs 2)Company.vb
          gokul.sonawane Gokul Sonawane (Inactive) made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
          chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Chaitali Acharya [ chaitali.acharya ] Deepali Tidke [ deepalit ]
          deepalit Deepali Tidke (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          deepalit Deepali Tidke (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          Hide
          deepalit Deepali Tidke (Inactive) added a comment -

          Received server error while cloning company on lb.

          Error log ;

          ErrorID : 0
          ErrorSource : ControllerAppTier.Clone->WORKTERRAControllerAppTier.Clone->Company.Clone->Company.CloneCompany->Company.BackupAndRestoreNewCompany
          ErrorMessage: Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
          Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.

          Show
          deepalit Deepali Tidke (Inactive) added a comment - Received server error while cloning company on lb. Error log ; ErrorID : 0 ErrorSource : ControllerAppTier.Clone->WORKTERRAControllerAppTier.Clone->Company.Clone->Company.CloneCompany->Company.BackupAndRestoreNewCompany ErrorMessage: Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression. Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
          deepalit Deepali Tidke (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212)
          deepalit Deepali Tidke (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
          deepalit Deepali Tidke (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Deepali Tidke [ deepalit ] Chaitali Acharya [ chaitali.acharya ]
          chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment Clone_Chaitali_test.png [ 23431 ]
          Hide
          chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Deepali Tidke

          surender kumar cloned a company Super Admin on LB it got cloned.Please refer attached screen short.When tried to clone with partner we got the error insufficient space on disc.
          There is insufficient space on LB.
          Please check with Indraprakash Tiwari once.

          Show
          chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Deepali Tidke surender kumar cloned a company Super Admin on LB it got cloned.Please refer attached screen short.When tried to clone with partner we got the error insufficient space on disc. There is insufficient space on LB. Please check with Indraprakash Tiwari once.
          chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Chaitali Acharya [ chaitali.acharya ] Deepali Tidke [ deepalit ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Deepali Tidke [ deepalit ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          Hide
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

          Tested this on LB cloned company is accessible to the partner who has cloned it.

          Ready for Stage.

          Show
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Tested this on LB cloned company is accessible to the partner who has cloned it. Ready for Stage.
          venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Stage Due Date 10/Aug/16 [ 2016-08-10 ]
          Hide
          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

          Hi all - is there any thought behind having the user access also clone over (i.e. if there are four individuals with rights to the main company to allow those same four the rights when a clone is made)?

          Show
          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - is there any thought behind having the user access also clone over (i.e. if there are four individuals with rights to the main company to allow those same four the rights when a clone is made)?
          gokul.sonawane Gokul Sonawane (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] Rakesh Roy [ rakeshr ]
          Hide
          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

          Any updates? Been over a week with no comments.

          Show
          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Any updates? Been over a week with no comments.
          Hide
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

          Jennifer Leugers This is deployed on stage. Please check and confirm.

          Show
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Jennifer Leugers This is deployed on stage. Please check and confirm.
          Hide
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi all - is there any thought behind having the user access also clone over (i.e. if there are four individuals with rights to the main company to allow those same four the rights when a clone is made)?
          ---For above point that is not possible as of now, will have to check with Design team whether this is possible or not.

          Show
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Hi all - is there any thought behind having the user access also clone over (i.e. if there are four individuals with rights to the main company to allow those same four the rights when a clone is made)? ---For above point that is not possible as of now, will have to check with Design team whether this is possible or not.
          Hide
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

          Jennifer Leugers

          Currently we are not cloning users access with clone company.

          If we do this, there is possibility that some inappropriate users might get access to the cloned company as we do not have any report which will shows list users having access to company.

          We can do this if required but we need approval from Dave for this enhancement.

          could you please check with Dave and update us for next action.

          Show
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Jennifer Leugers Currently we are not cloning users access with clone company. If we do this, there is possibility that some inappropriate users might get access to the cloned company as we do not have any report which will shows list users having access to company. We can do this if required but we need approval from Dave for this enhancement. could you please check with Dave and update us for next action.
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Rakesh Roy [ rakeshr ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Production Deployment on Hold(10224)
          satyap Satya made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Production Deployment on Hold(10224) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
          Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Deepali Tidke (Inactive) made transition -
          Open In Development
          2d 18h 42m 1
          Deepali Tidke (Inactive) made transition -
          In LB Testing Reopen in Local
          8h 38m 1
          Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
          Reopen in Local In Development
          2d 15h 31m 1
          Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
          In Development In LB Testing
          11s 2
          Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
          In LB Testing Stage Testing
          5d 12h 9m 1
          Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
          Stage Testing In Production Testing
          29d 16h 6m 1
          Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
          In Production Testing Production Complete
          4s 1

            People

            Assignee:
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers
            Reporter:
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive)
            Developer:
            Chaitali Acharya (Inactive)
            QA:
            Deepali Tidke (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Pre-Prod Due Date: