Files Affected:

Database Objects/MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_ACA_InsertEmployeeData.StoredProcedure.sql
Database Objects/MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Get_ACAIRS1095CData.StoredProcedure.sql

Smita Pawar,Sachin Hingole

This is just for your information that we were not considering rule of parity hire date in the last execution of 1095/4 reports. We had commented that code. So above issue occurred.
However,after discussion with Nandkumar, we are going to keep the code commented on all companies. We will un-comment the code only in those companies where timesheet is proper and are using timesheet to determine eligibility status.

If the timesheet is not proper, rule of parity will make employees new hire and un-expected codes may come up on reports.

So,in case of testing,first let us know the companies so that we can un comment the code.

Concern: 1H & 2D code not reflecting on 1095-C report.[Rule of Parity]
Cause: Rule of parity code was commented.Refer above comment for more justification
Correction: We will un-comment the code from backend of some selected companies where timesheet is proper and are using timesheet to determine eligibility status.

We have verified above mentioned issue on LB [ACA Automation] company and checked 1H and 2D code is displaying for the month of September. Its working fine.

We have observed that time sheet report is displaying stable working hours as 40.
PFA screen shot for additional information.

Smita Pawar

Timesheet will be displaying 40 as stable working hours because as per data in system,employee is full time.He was neither terminated nor his leave was imported.