WORKTERRAProject Type: software

WORKTERRA

Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-7725

ACA 2017: Base Date for calculating benefit effective date should not be set to GetDate.

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Severity:
      Low
    • Module:
      ACA - 2017
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Company:
      All Clients/Multiple Clients
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      Current Implementation : The base date for calculating effective date is set to today's date. In case if Employee is terminated and new hire rules do not terminated status selected, employee will be eligible to benefits from Date of hire.
      New Implementation : The base date should be set to employee's employment date/Rehire date for calculating benefit effective date.

      Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
      Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.

      Company: CVHP
      Scenario:

      • EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
      • The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
      • Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
      • When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.

      CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Sachin Hingole,Smita Pawar,Mahendra Mungase

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          is blocked by

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. WT-11281 Functional IRS Report | 1095c | We are unable to save 1095C report

          • High - Serious problem that could block progress.
          • Production Complete

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. WT-11351 Functional |Any company | Employee Change status | We are not able to change employee status

          • Medium - Has the potential to affect progress.
          • Rejected

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. WT-11601 LB_ACA_Getting server error while running 1095-C report.

          • Medium - Has the potential to affect progress.
          • Closed

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            Hide
            Permalink
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            3C's -
            Concern - Base Date for calculating benefit effective date should not be set to GetDate.
            Cause -

            • EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
            • The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
            • Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
            • When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.

            Correction - We have set Base Date as Employment Date /Rehire date of employee instead of GetDate()

            Show
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - - edited 3C's - Concern - Base Date for calculating benefit effective date should not be set to GetDate. Cause - EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year. The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire. Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule. When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule. Correction - We have set Base Date as Employment Date /Rehire date of employee instead of GetDate()
            Hide
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment -

            This point is blocked by WT-11281 , We will not be able to verify this point until Wt-11281 gets resolved.

            CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar

            Show
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - This point is blocked by WT-11281 , We will not be able to verify this point until Wt-11281 gets resolved. CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
            Hide
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment -

            This point is blocked by WT-11351 , We will not be able to verify this point until WT-11351 gets resolved

            CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar

            Show
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - This point is blocked by WT-11351 , We will not be able to verify this point until WT-11351 gets resolved CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
            Hide
            Permalink
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have started working on same. Testing is blocked due to WT-11601.
            Similarly when we tried to download 1095-C report with already existing report,
            system is taking much time due to LB slowness. Report will get run @ backend.
            We will update result once we download report folder.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have started working on same. Testing is blocked due to WT-11601 . Similarly when we tried to download 1095-C report with already existing report, system is taking much time due to LB slowness. Report will get run @ backend. We will update result once we download report folder.
            Hide
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            We verified above mentioned point ,Even though Process eligibility Completed , batch process started, Unable to generate 1095-C report

            CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar

            Show
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited We verified above mentioned point ,Even though Process eligibility Completed , batch process started, Unable to generate 1095-C report CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
            Hide
            Permalink
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on LB. Its working fine.
            Tested scenario is as follows.

            Added new hire test employee, with 3 months waiting period. checked 1H-2D code has reflected for 3 months. Terminated employee in waiting period and verified on PDF form
            1H code is reflecting for complete year.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on LB. Its working fine. Tested scenario is as follows. Added new hire test employee, with 3 months waiting period. checked 1H-2D code has reflected for 3 months. Terminated employee in waiting period and verified on PDF form 1H code is reflecting for complete year.
            Hide
            Permalink
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company Caiso for Hspl.
            Its working fine.

            Tested scenarios are as follows.
            Run 1095-C report with or without terminated status selected
            New hire employee terminated in waiting period and verified 1H and 2A codes are reflecting after termination.
            Fix is read for Production.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company Caiso for Hspl. Its working fine. Tested scenarios are as follows. Run 1095-C report with or without terminated status selected New hire employee terminated in waiting period and verified 1H and 2A codes are reflecting after termination. Fix is read for Production.
            Hide
            Permalink
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,
            Attaching production deployment approval email for reference:
            !Re Request for Production deployment - 25 Nov 2017.msg
            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching production deployment approval email for reference: !Re Request for Production deployment - 25 Nov 2017.msg Regards Gaurav
            Hide
            Permalink
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified this issue on Production and observed that it does not exist.Hence closing the same.

            Thanks,
            Mahendra

            Show
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified this issue on Production and observed that it does not exist.Hence closing the same. Thanks, Mahendra

              People

              Assignee:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
              QA:
              Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 16h Original Estimate - 16h
                  16h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 46.25h
                  46.25h