WORKTERRAProject Type: software

WORKTERRA

Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-7725

ACA 2017: Base Date for calculating benefit effective date should not be set to GetDate.

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Severity:
      Low
    • Module:
      ACA - 2017
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Company:
      All Clients/Multiple Clients
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      Current Implementation : The base date for calculating effective date is set to today's date. In case if Employee is terminated and new hire rules do not terminated status selected, employee will be eligible to benefits from Date of hire.
      New Implementation : The base date should be set to employee's employment date/Rehire date for calculating benefit effective date.

      Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
      Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.

      Company: CVHP
      Scenario:

      • EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
      • The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
      • Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
      • When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.

      CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Sachin Hingole,Smita Pawar,Mahendra Mungase

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          is blocked by

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. WT-11281 Functional IRS Report | 1095c | We are unable to save 1095C report

          • High - Serious problem that could block progress.
          • Production Complete

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. WT-11351 Functional |Any company | Employee Change status | We are not able to change employee status

          • Medium - Has the potential to affect progress.
          • Rejected

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. WT-11601 LB_ACA_Getting server error while running 1095-C report.

          • Medium - Has the potential to affect progress.
          • Closed

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) created issue -
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Description Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
            Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.

            +Company +: CVHP
            +Scenario+:
            * EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
            * The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
            * Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
            * When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.

            CC: [~nandkumar],[~sachin.hingole],[~smita.pawar],[~mahendra.mungase]             		Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
            Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.

            +Company+: CVHP
            +Scenario+:
            * EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
            * The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
            * Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
            * When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.

            CC: [~nandkumar],[~sachin.hingole],[~smita.pawar],[~mahendra.mungase]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 16h [ 57600 ] 15.5h [ 55800 ]
            Time Spent 0.5h [ 1800 ]
            Worklog Id 18582 [ 18582 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Kumar Chhajed [ kumar.chhajed ]
            Permalink
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 12/Jan/17 12:37 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              discussion with Kumar
              analysis

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 15.5h [ 55800 ] 14.5h [ 52200 ]
            Time Spent 0.5h [ 1800 ] 1.5h [ 5400 ]
            Worklog Id 18725 [ 18725 ]
            Permalink
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) logged work - 12/Jan/17 12:46 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Repro Issue

            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 14.5h [ 52200 ] 11.5h [ 41400 ]
            Time Spent 1.5h [ 5400 ] 4.5h [ 16200 ]
            Worklog Id 18734 [ 18734 ]
            Permalink
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 12/Jan/17 05:19 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Issue Creation

            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            Permalink
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 16/Jan/17 11:53 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              analysis
              testing
              discussion

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 11.5h [ 41400 ] 9.5h [ 34200 ]
            Time Spent 4.5h [ 16200 ] 6.5h [ 23400 ]
            Worklog Id 19284 [ 19284 ]
            Permalink
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) logged work - 16/Jan/17 02:23 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Testing
              Coding

            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 9.5h [ 34200 ] 6.5h [ 23400 ]
            Time Spent 6.5h [ 23400 ] 9.5h [ 34200 ]
            Worklog Id 19384 [ 19384 ]
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Kumar Chhajed [ kumar.chhajed ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
            Permalink
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 17/Jan/17 11:15 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              discussion
              coding
              query execution on all companies.

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 6.5h [ 23400 ] 4.5h [ 16200 ]
            Time Spent 9.5h [ 34200 ] 11.5h [ 41400 ]
            Worklog Id 19515 [ 19515 ]
            Permalink
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) logged work - 17/Jan/17 12:21 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Internal discussion and Analysis

            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 4.5h [ 16200 ] 3.5h [ 12600 ]
            Time Spent 11.5h [ 41400 ] 12.5h [ 45000 ]
            Worklog Id 19541 [ 19541 ]
            Permalink
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 27/Jan/17 07:49 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Internal discussion

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 3.5h [ 12600 ] 3h [ 10800 ]
            Time Spent 12.5h [ 45000 ] 13h [ 46800 ]
            Worklog Id 21224 [ 21224 ]
            Permalink
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 27/Jan/17 12:41 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              analysis and coding

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 3h [ 10800 ] 1h [ 3600 ]
            Time Spent 13h [ 46800 ] 15h [ 54000 ]
            Worklog Id 21333 [ 21333 ]
            Permalink
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 30/Jan/17 04:09 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Analysis
              Discussion
              Coding and Testing

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 1h [ 3600 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 15h [ 54000 ] 19h [ 68400 ]
            Worklog Id 21744 [ 21744 ]
            Permalink
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 31/Jan/17 04:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              coding and testing

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 19h [ 68400 ] 20h [ 72000 ]
            Worklog Id 22156 [ 22156 ]
            Permalink
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) logged work - 20/Feb/17 01:54 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Analysis
              Coding
              Internal discussion

            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 20h [ 72000 ] 25h [ 90000 ]
            Worklog Id 26178 [ 26178 ]
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Kumar Chhajed [ kumar.chhajed ]
            Permalink
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) logged work - 21/Feb/17 01:55 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Coding
              Unit testing
              Internal discussion

            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 25h [ 90000 ] 29h [ 104400 ]
            Worklog Id 26410 [ 26410 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Severity Medium [ 13102 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Severity Medium [ 13102 ] Complex [ 13103 ]
            Permalink
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) logged work - 05/Jul/17 12:16 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Internal discussion

            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 29h [ 104400 ] 29.5h [ 106200 ]
            Worklog Id 60860 [ 60860 ]
            Permalink
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) logged work - 06/Jul/17 01:12 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Analysis
              Discussion with Ramya

            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 29.5h [ 106200 ] 30.5h [ 109800 ]
            Worklog Id 61345 [ 61345 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Bug Severity Low [ 16703 ]
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Kumar Chhajed [ kumar.chhajed ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            Hide
            Permalink
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            3C's -
            Concern - Base Date for calculating benefit effective date should not be set to GetDate.
            Cause -

            • EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
            • The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
            • Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
            • When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.

            Correction - We have set Base Date as Employment Date /Rehire date of employee instead of GetDate()

            Show
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - - edited 3C's - Concern - Base Date for calculating benefit effective date should not be set to GetDate. Cause - EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year. The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire. Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule. When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule. Correction - We have set Base Date as Employment Date /Rehire date of employee instead of GetDate()
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] Rutuja Chilwar [ rutuja.chilwar ]
            Production Due Date 26/Sep/2017
            Stage Due Date 25/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-25 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 25/Sep/17 12:46 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.75h
               
              <No comment>
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 30.5h [ 109800 ] 31.25h [ 112500 ]
            Worklog Id 81080 [ 81080 ]
            Permalink
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 25/Sep/17 04:04 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Discussion with QA
              Analysis of Save issue in IRS reports

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 31.25h [ 112500 ] 31h 40m [ 114000 ]
            Worklog Id 81219 [ 81219 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 31h 40m [ 114000 ] 31.75h [ 114300 ]
            Worklog Id 81219 [ 81219 ]
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-11281 [ WT-11281 ]
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-11281 [ WT-11281 ]
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is blocked by WT-11281 [ WT-11281 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment -

            This point is blocked by WT-11281 , We will not be able to verify this point until Wt-11281 gets resolved.

            CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar

            Show
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - This point is blocked by WT-11281 , We will not be able to verify this point until Wt-11281 gets resolved. CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 27/Sep/17 06:18 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               
              <No comment>
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 31.75h [ 114300 ] 32h [ 115200 ]
            Worklog Id 81834 [ 81834 ]
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Stage Due Date 25/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-25 ] 29/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-29 ]
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Production Due Date 26/Sep/2017 04/Oct/2017
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 28/Sep/17 07:19 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2.5h
               
              <No comment>
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is blocked by WT-11351 [ WT-11351 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment -

            This point is blocked by WT-11351 , We will not be able to verify this point until WT-11351 gets resolved

            CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar

            Show
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - This point is blocked by WT-11351 , We will not be able to verify this point until WT-11351 gets resolved CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 32h [ 115200 ] 34.5h [ 124200 ]
            Worklog Id 82542 [ 82542 ]
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 29/Sep/17 12:45 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               
              <No comment>
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 34.5h [ 124200 ] 35.5h [ 127800 ]
            Worklog Id 82818 [ 82818 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have started working on same. Testing is blocked due to WT-11601.
            Similarly when we tried to download 1095-C report with already existing report,
            system is taking much time due to LB slowness. Report will get run @ backend.
            We will update result once we download report folder.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have started working on same. Testing is blocked due to WT-11601 . Similarly when we tried to download 1095-C report with already existing report, system is taking much time due to LB slowness. Report will get run @ backend. We will update result once we download report folder.
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is blocked by WT-11601 [ WT-11601 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            We verified above mentioned point ,Even though Process eligibility Completed , batch process started, Unable to generate 1095-C report

            CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar

            Show
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited We verified above mentioned point ,Even though Process eligibility Completed , batch process started, Unable to generate 1095-C report CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
            Permalink
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) logged work - 24/Oct/17 11:07 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               
              <No comment>
            Hide
            Permalink
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on LB. Its working fine.
            Tested scenario is as follows.

            Added new hire test employee, with 3 months waiting period. checked 1H-2D code has reflected for 3 months. Terminated employee in waiting period and verified on PDF form
            1H code is reflecting for complete year.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on LB. Its working fine. Tested scenario is as follows. Added new hire test employee, with 3 months waiting period. checked 1H-2D code has reflected for 3 months. Terminated employee in waiting period and verified on PDF form 1H code is reflecting for complete year.
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 35.5h [ 127800 ] 35.75h [ 128700 ]
            Worklog Id 86025 [ 86025 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Rutuja Chilwar [ rutuja.chilwar ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Description Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
            Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.

            +Company+: CVHP
            +Scenario+:
            * EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
            * The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
            * Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
            * When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.

            CC: [~nandkumar],[~sachin.hingole],[~smita.pawar],[~mahendra.mungase]             		Current Implementation : The base date for calculating effective date is set to today's date. In case if Employee is terminated and new hire rules do not terminated status selected, employee will be eligible to benefits from Date of hire.
            New Implementation : The base date should be set to employee's employment date/Rehire date for calculating benefit effective date.

            Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
            Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.

            +Company+: CVHP
            +Scenario+:
            * EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
            * The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
            * Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
            * When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.

            CC: [~nandkumar],[~sachin.hingole],[~smita.pawar],[~mahendra.mungase]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 16/Nov/17 12:56 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4.5h
               
              <No comment>
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 35.75h [ 128700 ] 40.25h [ 144900 ]
            Worklog Id 91177 [ 91177 ]
            Permalink
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 17/Nov/17 12:26 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               
              <No comment>
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 40.25h [ 144900 ] 44.25h [ 159300 ]
            Worklog Id 91361 [ 91361 ]
            Permalink
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) logged work - 20/Nov/17 09:26 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Stage testing

            Hide
            Permalink
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company Caiso for Hspl.
            Its working fine.

            Tested scenarios are as follows.
            Run 1095-C report with or without terminated status selected
            New hire employee terminated in waiting period and verified 1H and 2A codes are reflecting after termination.
            Fix is read for Production.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company Caiso for Hspl. Its working fine. Tested scenarios are as follows. Run 1095-C report with or without terminated status selected New hire employee terminated in waiting period and verified 1H and 2A codes are reflecting after termination. Fix is read for Production.
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 44.25h [ 159300 ] 45.25h [ 162900 ]
            Worklog Id 91600 [ 91600 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Production Deployment on Hold(10224)
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Production Deployment on Hold(10224) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            Production Due Date 04/Oct/2017 25/Nov/2017
            Stage Due Date 29/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-29 ] 11/Nov/17 [ 2017-11-11 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Approval status Approved for production deployment [ 18457 ]
            Epic/Theme ACA
            Labels ACA
            Hide
            Permalink
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,
            Attaching production deployment approval email for reference:
            !Re Request for Production deployment - 25 Nov 2017.msg
            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching production deployment approval email for reference: !Re Request for Production deployment - 25 Nov 2017.msg Regards Gaurav
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Company All Clients/Multiple Clients [ 18434 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            Hide
            Permalink
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified this issue on Production and observed that it does not exist.Hence closing the same.

            Thanks,
            Mahendra

            Show
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified this issue on Production and observed that it does not exist.Hence closing the same. Thanks, Mahendra
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ] Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            Permalink
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) logged work - 29/Nov/17 04:16 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Issue verification on Production

            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 45.25h [ 162900 ] 46.25h [ 166500 ]
            Worklog Id 93788 [ 93788 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            		1d 49m 1
            Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            		244d 1h 14m 1
            Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            		61d 14m 1
            Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            		14d 2h 37m 1
            Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            		19s 1
            Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            		6s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
              QA:
              Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 16h Original Estimate - 16h
                  16h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 46.25h
                  46.25h