Current Implementation : The base date for calculating effective date is set to today's date. In case if Employee is terminated and new hire rules do not terminated status selected, employee will be eligible to benefits from Date of hire.
New Implementation : The base date should be set to employee's employment date/Rehire date for calculating benefit effective date.
Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.
Company: CVHP
Scenario:
EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.
Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.
+Company +: CVHP
+Scenario+:
* EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
* The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
* Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
* When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.
Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.
+Company+: CVHP
+Scenario+:
* EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
* The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
* Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
* When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.
Kumar Chhajed (Inactive)
added a comment - - edited 3C's -
Concern - Base Date for calculating benefit effective date should not be set to GetDate.
Cause -
EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.
Correction - We have set Base Date as Employment Date /Rehire date of employee instead of GetDate()
Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive)
added a comment - This point is blocked by WT-11281 , We will not be able to verify this point until Wt-11281 gets resolved.
CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive)
added a comment - This point is blocked by WT-11351 , We will not be able to verify this point until WT-11351 gets resolved
CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
We have started working on same. Testing is blocked due to WT-11601.
Similarly when we tried to download 1095-C report with already existing report,
system is taking much time due to LB slowness. Report will get run @ backend.
We will update result once we download report folder.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - We have started working on same. Testing is blocked due to WT-11601 .
Similarly when we tried to download 1095-C report with already existing report,
system is taking much time due to LB slowness. Report will get run @ backend.
We will update result once we download report folder.
Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive)
added a comment - - edited We verified above mentioned point ,Even though Process eligibility Completed , batch process started, Unable to generate 1095-C report
CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
We have verified above mentioned issue on LB. Its working fine.
Tested scenario is as follows.
Added new hire test employee, with 3 months waiting period. checked 1H-2D code has reflected for 3 months. Terminated employee in waiting period and verified on PDF form
1H code is reflecting for complete year.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on LB. Its working fine.
Tested scenario is as follows.
Added new hire test employee, with 3 months waiting period. checked 1H-2D code has reflected for 3 months. Terminated employee in waiting period and verified on PDF form
1H code is reflecting for complete year.
Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.
+Company+: CVHP
+Scenario+:
* EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
* The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
* Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
* When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.
Current Implementation : The base date for calculating effective date is set to today's date. In case if Employee is terminated and new hire rules do not terminated status selected, employee will be eligible to benefits from Date of hire.
New Implementation : The base date should be set to employee's employment date/Rehire date for calculating benefit effective date.
Base Date for calculating benefit effective date is set to GetDate.
Due to this, benefit effective date comes up different than expected.
+Company+: CVHP
+Scenario+:
* EE is hired in 2016(mid month) and terminated after few months in the same year.
* The new hire rule is set to First of month following or coincident with XX days from Date of Hire.
* Terminated status is not selected in eligibility rule.
* When we run the forms, as the base date is GetDate(), EE becomes eligible for benefit from DOH itself as he does not satisfy any rule.
We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company Caiso for Hspl.
Its working fine.
Tested scenarios are as follows.
Run 1095-C report with or without terminated status selected
New hire employee terminated in waiting period and verified 1H and 2A codes are reflecting after termination.
Fix is read for Production.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company Caiso for Hspl.
Its working fine.
Tested scenarios are as follows.
Run 1095-C report with or without terminated status selected
New hire employee terminated in waiting period and verified 1H and 2A codes are reflecting after termination.
Fix is read for Production.
Gaurav Sodani (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi All,
Attaching production deployment approval email for reference:
!Re Request for Production deployment - 25 Nov 2017.msg
Regards
Gaurav
Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
added a comment - We have verified this issue on Production and observed that it does not exist.Hence closing the same.
Thanks,
Mahendra
Medium 
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
created issue -
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
made changes -
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
made changes -
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made changes -
Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive)
made changes -
Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive)
made changes -
Gaurav Sodani (Inactive)
made changes -
3C's -
Concern - Base Date for calculating benefit effective date should not be set to GetDate.
Cause -
Correction - We have set Base Date as Employment Date /Rehire date of employee instead of GetDate()