New Features 2017Project Type: software

New Features 2017

Uploaded image for project: 'New Features 2017'
  1. New Features 2017
  2. NF-326

When the employee is searched with the NIN number as '12 or 12 34' then the employee having the NIN number gets display along with the employee who does not have the NIN number associated with them.

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Low
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: UK Benefits
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      BenAdmin
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Q1

      Description

      When the employee is searched with the NIN number suppose as '12 or 12 34', then the employee having the NIN number gets display along with the employee who does not have the NIN number associated with them.

      Steps:-
      1. Login to the LB
      2. Search the company 'UK Benefits' and open
      The same company
      3. From the 'Employee Administration' link, click
      On the 'Search Employee' link.
      4. Search the employee using the numbers
      As '12 or '12 34'.

      Expected result:- Only the employee who has the NIN number as mention above should get display in the search result.

      Actual result:- The employee who does not have the NIN number also gets display in the search result.

      Cc:Priya Dhamande

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          relates to

          Enhancement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. NF-292 Show NIN on Search Employee

          • Medium - Has the potential to affect progress.
          • Reopen in Local

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            Hide
            Permalink
            chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Rajani Jaiswal

            When search 12 or 12 34 the system in the backend checks for 12 or 12 34 in all fields i.e
            1)SSN.
            2)NIN.
            3)Empiid.
            4)Firstname .
            5)Lastname.

            IN UK benefits in backend we have SSN having 12 or 1234 .
            These have NIN as NULL so they are seen in the list .

            Going forward UK related companies will not have SSN so this issue will not arise.

            CC:Priya Dhamande
            Thanks Chaitali

            Show
            chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Rajani Jaiswal When search 12 or 12 34 the system in the backend checks for 12 or 12 34 in all fields i.e 1)SSN. 2)NIN. 3)Empiid. 4)Firstname . 5)Lastname. IN UK benefits in backend we have SSN having 12 or 1234 . These have NIN as NULL so they are seen in the list . Going forward UK related companies will not have SSN so this issue will not arise. CC: Priya Dhamande Thanks Chaitali
            Hide
            Permalink
            rajani.jaiswal Rajani Jaiswal (Inactive) added a comment -

            As per Chaitali's comment and discussion with Priya, I am closing this issue.

            Show
            rajani.jaiswal Rajani Jaiswal (Inactive) added a comment - As per Chaitali's comment and discussion with Priya, I am closing this issue.
            Hide
            Permalink
            rajani.jaiswal Rajani Jaiswal (Inactive) added a comment -

            As per Chaitali's comment and discussion with Priya, I am closing this issue.

            Show
            rajani.jaiswal Rajani Jaiswal (Inactive) added a comment - As per Chaitali's comment and discussion with Priya, I am closing this issue.

              People

              Assignee:
              rajani.jaiswal Rajani Jaiswal (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              rajani.jaiswal Rajani Jaiswal (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: