-
Type:
Change Request
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Low
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: UI Refresh
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:Others
-
Module:BenAdmin - Enrollment
-
Reported by:CareerBuilder
-
Company:GBAPS
-
Item State:Stage QA - Production Deployment on Hold
-
Severity:Simple
-
UAT For:UI Refresh
Credentials: Quinn Brandon | quinn2124 | Password@1 | GBAPS
Comments: Under collapsed view, you can see that the format of the relationship on the covered members differ depending if the employee can set the coverage amount. Can we standardise the relationship format to show [Relationship] instead of (Relationship)?
Comments: Under collapsed view, you can see that the format of the section header of ‘Covered Member(s)’ differ if we are showing the colon. Can we standardize and remove the : from behind ‘Covered Members(s):’ where applicable?