569.0
Under Benefit Type Builder, the benefit descriptions should not be defaulted.  I understand the want for the ability to exist but we should not have default language.  If we do, does that mean all of the current benefits are going to have that language?  If that is the intent, I think we need all of the wordings that have been added so we can approve the way they read.

"9.20.17 (RK)--Not getting by default description. Could you please share screenhsot ?
10.17.17 (RK)- Got your point, this is by default poplutaed based on benfit type on Azure which is newly introduced field on Azure to display on enroll now page. Will discuss in next wednesday call i.e. on Oct 25.
10/25 (SH) - Should we remove all default language for benefit types? We will check with Amruta for default language."

"10.12.17 - click on any of the benefits and they are showing the benefit description.  This is default language and will be put on each benefit type when they are built or no?

11.21.17 - agreed we would remove; changing to re-open until that change is made."