Uploaded image for project: 'New Features 2017'
  1. New Features 2017
  2. NF-5245

Functional - Long - Partner - Tour Builder - eligibility rule is not selected after migration

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Low
    • Resolution: Cancelled
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: UI Refresh
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Others
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Critical
    • Level:
      Partner
    • Module:
      OnBoard
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Company:
      All Clients/Multiple Clients
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Browser:
      IE 11, Google Chrome

      Description

      Log in to azure
      select LONG
      go to OnBoard - tour builder
      edit Long onboarding Tour 1
      go to define eligibility

      actual result - does not show eligibility selected on Azure, refer images
      expected result - correct eligibility rule should be selected

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            shaikh.ateeque Shaikh Ateeque (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Ashwin Wankhede,

            We have analyzed on this issue and below are our observation.

            1. We have found that the 'LONG' company Last restored date on Azure 21 Apr 2017.
            2. The migration script of Tour Builder last execution date on azure 2017-07-28 06:09:37.013
            3. I have restored the 'LONG' company database in to our Local database and executed the migration script and found that it is working fine However this is not working correctly on Azure environment

            @Ashwin: Could you please check and confirm what exactly issue?

            As per discussion with Vijayendra, I am keep this ticket to OnHold.

            We will proceed with this request once the Azure regular build get start.

            Thanks & Regards,
            Shaikh Ateeque

            Jyoti Mayne Avnish Yadav Vijayendra Shinde Sachin Hingole Nidhi Kaul

            Show
            shaikh.ateeque Shaikh Ateeque (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Ashwin Wankhede , We have analyzed on this issue and below are our observation. 1. We have found that the 'LONG' company Last restored date on Azure 21 Apr 2017. 2. The migration script of Tour Builder last execution date on azure 2017-07-28 06:09:37.013 3. I have restored the 'LONG' company database in to our Local database and executed the migration script and found that it is working fine However this is not working correctly on Azure environment @Ashwin: Could you please check and confirm what exactly issue? As per discussion with Vijayendra, I am keep this ticket to OnHold. We will proceed with this request once the Azure regular build get start. Thanks & Regards, Shaikh Ateeque Jyoti Mayne Avnish Yadav Vijayendra Shinde Sachin Hingole Nidhi Kaul
            Hide
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Shaikh Ateeque,

            We have checked the script is shown as executed , As we checked, we tried manually executing script on its HSPL copy. But still the rules are not getting migrated. It can be a data issue.

            Can you please verify it on its HSPL copy and let us know.

            Show
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Shaikh Ateeque , We have checked the script is shown as executed , As we checked, we tried manually executing script on its HSPL copy. But still the rules are not getting migrated. It can be a data issue. Can you please verify it on its HSPL copy and let us know.
            Hide
            nidhi.kaul Nidhi Kaul (Inactive) added a comment -

            Shaikh Ateeque
            What are we with this?

            Amruta LohiyaSatya

            Show
            nidhi.kaul Nidhi Kaul (Inactive) added a comment - Shaikh Ateeque What are we with this? Amruta Lohiya Satya
            Hide
            shaikh.ateeque Shaikh Ateeque (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Nidhi Kaul,

            I have verified this issue on Preprod and CodeMap environment and found that this issue is not there (i.e. Generic Eligibility Migrated properly).

            That's Why I am changing the priority of this task to Low.

            Thanks & Regards,
            Shaikh Ateeque

            Satya Amruta Lohiya Jyoti Mayne

            Show
            shaikh.ateeque Shaikh Ateeque (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Nidhi Kaul , I have verified this issue on Preprod and CodeMap environment and found that this issue is not there (i.e. Generic Eligibility Migrated properly). That's Why I am changing the priority of this task to Low. Thanks & Regards, Shaikh Ateeque Satya Amruta Lohiya Jyoti Mayne

              People

              Assignee:
              shaikh.ateeque Shaikh Ateeque (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Shaikh Ateeque (Inactive)
              QA:
              Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 9h
                  9h