-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Resolution Setting
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: UI Refresh
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:Production
-
Bug Severity:Medium
-
Module:BenAdmin - Export
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Company:CVHP
-
Item State:Stage QA - Production Deployment on Hold
Concern : The below employees deductions for the STD grandfathered plan did not appear on the payroll file. The STD grandfathered plan was terminated effective 12/31/2017.
Cause: We have checked given employees(010131,104952,105408) and these employees enrolled into Previous Short Term Disability -52 Weeks (coverage amount listed is your weekly benefit) STD plan were enrollment was roll out on 10/19/2017 export file properly. On 10/31/2017 given employees STD enrollments termination date was changed 12/31/2017 to 10/31/2017 through scheduled import.
Please find below snap.
010131_ViewHistory.png 104952_ViewHistory.png 105408_ViewHistory.png
All above STD enrollments are terminated but they are not rolled out on the file because of we mapped CVHP Payroll Indicator and Send Records Without Zero Cost Indicator together on sub template. Combination of these two indicators have some code logic issues, due to this given employees STD enrollments are not roll out on 11/02/2017 export.
Correction: We have corrected code logic to send terminated records in case of CVHP Payroll Indicator and Send Records Without Zero Cost indicators are mapped on template.
Impacted Areas: Row wise export.
Please let us know if you need more detail
Affected Files: ExportProcessRowwise.vb
- relates to
-
-
- Closed
-
| Description |
*Concern* : The below employees deductions for the STD grandfathered plan did not appear on the payroll file. The STD grandfathered plan was terminated effective 12/31/2017. *Cause*: We have checked given employees(010131,104952,105408) and these employees enrolled into Previous Short Term Disability -52 Weeks (coverage amount listed is your weekly benefit) STD plan were enrollment was roll out on 10/19/2017 export file properly. On 10/31/2017 given employees STD enrollments termination date was changed 12/31/2017 to 10/31/2017 through scheduled import. Please find below snap. 010131_ViewHistory.png 104952_ViewHistory.png 105408_ViewHistory.png All above STD enrollments are terminated but they are not rolled out on the file because of we mapped CVHP Payroll Indicator and Send Records Without Zero Cost Indicator together on sub template. Combination of these two indicators have some code logic issues, due to this given employees STD enrollments are not roll out on 11/02/2017 export. *Correction*: We have corrected code logic to send terminated records in case of CVHP Payroll Indicator and Send Records Without Zero Cost indicators are mapped on template. Impacted Areas: Row wise export. Please let us know if you need more detail |
*Concern* : The below employees deductions for the STD grandfathered plan did not appear on the payroll file. The STD grandfathered plan was terminated effective 12/31/2017. *Cause*: We have checked given employees(010131,104952,105408) and these employees enrolled into Previous Short Term Disability -52 Weeks (coverage amount listed is your weekly benefit) STD plan were enrollment was roll out on 10/19/2017 export file properly. On 10/31/2017 given employees STD enrollments termination date was changed 12/31/2017 to 10/31/2017 through scheduled import. Please find below snap. 010131_ViewHistory.png 104952_ViewHistory.png 105408_ViewHistory.png All above STD enrollments are terminated but they are not rolled out on the file because of we mapped CVHP Payroll Indicator and Send Records Without Zero Cost Indicator together on sub template. Combination of these two indicators have some code logic issues, due to this given employees STD enrollments are not roll out on 11/02/2017 export. *Correction*: We have corrected code logic to send terminated records in case of CVHP Payroll Indicator and Send Records Without Zero Cost indicators are mapped on template. Impacted Areas: Row wise export. Please let us know if you need more detail Affected Files: ExportProcessRowwise.vb |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
| Code Review Date | 18/Dec/2017 | |
| Code Reviewed By | Rajendra Pawar [ 16501 ] | |
| Dev Due Date | 19/Dec/2017 | |
| Root Cause | Scenario/Requirement Missed [ 18432 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) |
Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) |
| Assignee | Ganesh Sadawarte [ ganesh.sadawarte ] | Swapnil Eksambekar [ swapnil.eksambekar ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 0h [ 0 ] | |
| Time Spent | 6h [ 21600 ] | |
| Worklog Id | 97093 [ 97093 ] |
| Worklog Id | 97093 [ 97093 ] |
I reported this issue early this week and haven't received a response.
The below employees are having effective date issues as well. This is related to the ticket were plans effective dates was given there new hire effective date when it should have been effective 01/01/2018. We need theses to be corrected tonight.
007421
008762
008855
010131
010802
103318
104952
105029
105062
104426
104945
105408
105664
105846
106822
1073115
1074720
1075201
1075251
1075437
1075445
1075446
1075449
1075456
1075476
1075481
1075492
1075501
1075521
1075526
1075533
1075572
1075594
1075606
1075644
1075653
1075674
1075710
1075722
Hi lisa davison,
We already have WT-12053 ticket which is going to be deployed on Stage on 12/22. It would be great if you could list your concerns on WT ticket.
Please let me know in case of any concern
Hi Ganesh Sadawarte,
Please look into the query raised by Lisa
Regards
Gaurav
Gaurav Sodani (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi lisa davison ,
We already have WT-12053 ticket which is going to be deployed on Stage on 12/22. It would be great if you could list your concerns on WT ticket.
Please let me know in case of any concern
Hi Ganesh Sadawarte ,
Please look into the query raised by Lisa
Regards
Gaurav
Abhay Patil Amit Thorve Swapnil Eksambekar Samir 
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made changes -
| Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Local Testing [ 10200 ] |
| Assignee | Swapnil Eksambekar [ swapnil.eksambekar ] | Aniruddha Dev [ aniruddha.dev ] |
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) |
| Assignee | Aniruddha Dev [ aniruddha.dev ] | Swapnil Eksambekar [ swapnil.eksambekar ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 20m
-
Discussion with ganesh related to issue
| Time Spent | 6h [ 21600 ] | 6h 20m [ 22800 ] |
| Worklog Id | 97563 [ 97563 ] |
Verified this fix on CodeMap . Working as expected .
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211) |
Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) |
| Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) |
| Status | Local Testing [ 10200 ] | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Production Deployment on Hold(10224) |
Verified this on Pre-prod,it is working as expected.
| Time Spent | 6h 20m [ 22800 ] | 7h 20m [ 26400 ] |
| Worklog Id | 102207 [ 102207 ] |
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made changes -
| Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
| Status | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] | Resolution Setting [ 11616 ] |
| Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times |
|---|
|
21h 55m | 1 |
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
2d 3h 38m | 1 |
|
18d 1h 31m | 1 |
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
143d 13h 19m | 1 |
Hi Swapnil Eksambekar,
Please check this is deployed on LB.
Thanks,
Ganesh