Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Resolution Setting
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: UI Refresh
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Export
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Company:
      JE Dunn
    • Item State:
      Stage QA - Production Deployment on Hold
    • Issue Importance:
      Must Have

      Description

      Template name: JE DUNN_Discovery Cobra QB_IN_Use_NEW 2017
      11/3 file
      1. Timothy Benbow is the EE; ISABELLA PIPARO - dependent Child removed during OE:
      2. Jesus Plata is the EE, we sent Eryn Eberlein - Divorce QE VERY OLD 2016 Divorce, back in 2016:

      11/10 file:
      1. EE is Dirk Schafer, removed child Carolyn Schafer form Medical/RX this also went over as a Divorce QE

      Can you look at the settings? We dont think this should pass this way

      Thank you

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            rajendra.pawar Rajendra Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Attached is the unit testing document - Dev Tested Scenarios.xls

            Below cobra events has been tested in unit testing.

            • Employee Termination
            • Divorce- Spouse to Ex-Spouse
            • Overage Dependent
            • Retired
            • Class Change
            Show
            rajendra.pawar Rajendra Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Attached is the unit testing document - Dev Tested Scenarios.xls Below cobra events has been tested in unit testing. Employee Termination Divorce- Spouse to Ex-Spouse Overage Dependent Retired Class Change
            Hide
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified this on Codemap with following scenarios

            • Employee Termination
            • Class Change
            • Retired

            Testing is in progress for remaining scenarios.

            CC-Aniruddha DevRakesh RoyHrishikesh Deshpande

            Show
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment - Verified this on Codemap with following scenarios Employee Termination Class Change Retired Testing is in progress for remaining scenarios. CC- Aniruddha Dev Rakesh Roy Hrishikesh Deshpande
            Hide
            aniruddha.dev Aniruddha Dev (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hi Rajendra Pawar

            Verified this today on CodeMap with Termination, Deceased and Divroce scenarios and below is the observation for Termination event

            [QB], [QBEvent] [QBPLAN],Davis Vision rows are getting repeated for all the dependents for termination event.

            After [QBPLAN] of subscriber instead of [QBDEPENDENT] the [QB] row is exported with dependent details on it and after that [QBEvent] and then [QBPLAN] row with Davis Vision plan same happened for subsequent dependents.

            Example Employee : Kevin Brettmann
            Company name : For QA-JE Dunn-Azure
            Environmemnt : CodeMap

            CC:Vinayak Kulkarni

            Show
            aniruddha.dev Aniruddha Dev (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Rajendra Pawar Verified this today on CodeMap with Termination, Deceased and Divroce scenarios and below is the observation for Termination event [QB] , [QBEvent] [QBPLAN] ,Davis Vision rows are getting repeated for all the dependents for termination event. After [QBPLAN] of subscriber instead of [QBDEPENDENT] the [QB] row is exported with dependent details on it and after that [QBEvent] and then [QBPLAN] row with Davis Vision plan same happened for subsequent dependents. Example Employee : Kevin Brettmann Company name : For QA-JE Dunn-Azure Environmemnt : CodeMap CC: Vinayak Kulkarni
            Hide
            rajendra.pawar Rajendra Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Aniruddha Dev,

            This is due to customization issue on Visions plan.

            With kind regards,
            Rajendra Pawar

            Show
            rajendra.pawar Rajendra Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Aniruddha Dev , This is due to customization issue on Visions plan. With kind regards, Rajendra Pawar
            Hide
            aniruddha.dev Aniruddha Dev (Inactive) added a comment -

            Working as expected on CodeMap. Ready for Stage deployment.

            Show
            aniruddha.dev Aniruddha Dev (Inactive) added a comment - Working as expected on CodeMap. Ready for Stage deployment.

              People

              Assignee:
              hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              rajendra.pawar Rajendra Pawar (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Rajendra Pawar (Inactive)
              QA:
              Aniruddha Dev (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 28h
                  28h
                  Remaining:
                  Time Spent - 10h Remaining Estimate - 18h
                  18h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 10h Remaining Estimate - 18h
                  10h