Details

    • Type: Support Activity
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Labels:
      None
    • Support Task Type:
      ACA IRS Report
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Company:
      Hallmark Aviation Services
    • Categories:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Client

      Description

      NA

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            We have created a new rule named "PT Ineligible rule" for the set of employees that need to be included in the run.

            The new rule specifies the report to include all employees satisfying following conditions :

            1. PT eligible and PT ineligible class and enrolled in Medicals plans(both benefit type) selected on 1095C report
            2. FT class

            All employees who got 1H/Blank were replaced with 1H/2B.

            Also we have removed all correction data of previous runs.So in-case if you want to do any correction to the fresh run,you can add the correction and re-run the report with apply user correction flag as yes.

            We have verified that IRS submission for year 2017 was not yet created,so we have removed the form status(earlier set to corrected) in latest 1095C run as the submission will be original.IRS will reject original submission with corrected records.

            There are total 2409 employees in fresh 1095C run.Please refer latest 1095C run for verification.

            Also we have re-run 1094C report and created IRS submission report for 2017 named "IRS Submission for Hallmark".

            CC:Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Smita Pawar

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , We have created a new rule named " PT Ineligible rule " for the set of employees that need to be included in the run. The new rule specifies the report to include all employees satisfying following conditions : PT eligible and PT ineligible class and enrolled in Medicals plans(both benefit type) selected on 1095C report FT class All employees who got 1H/Blank were replaced with 1H/2B . Also we have removed all correction data of previous runs.So in-case if you want to do any correction to the fresh run,you can add the correction and re-run the report with apply user correction flag as yes. We have verified that IRS submission for year 2017 was not yet created,so we have removed the form status(earlier set to corrected) in latest 1095C run as the submission will be original.IRS will reject original submission with corrected records. There are total 2409 employees in fresh 1095C run. Please refer latest 1095C run for verification . Also we have re-run 1094C report and created IRS submission report for 2017 named "IRS Submission for Hallmark". CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Smita Pawar
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - 

            We asked that “If those within a PT class (either eligible or ineligible) were only enrolled for part of the year, for the months in which they were employed and not enrolled, we need to make sure we are showing a 2B code in line 16 rather than a blank” but it looks like everyone who had a 1H/blank were changed to a 1H/2B including those in a FT class (which shouldn’t have happened).

            Could someone look into this ASAP?  I have to file them today as I don't have any more time.

            Thanks.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all -  We asked that “If those within a PT class (either eligible or ineligible) were only enrolled for part of the year, for the months in which they were employed and not enrolled, we need to make sure we are showing a 2B code in line 16 rather than a blank” but it looks like everyone who had a 1H/blank were changed to a 1H/2B including those in a FT class (which shouldn’t have happened). Could someone look into this ASAP?  I have to file them today as I don't have any more time. Thanks.
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - sorry ... I think the run is good.  The analysis shows them being in FT status but it looks like they are currently in FT status but not during the month in which they are receiving the 2B.  It would be helpful if in the future, if we can, to show their classes on the analysis as they were in that month to avoid this type of confusion.

            I appreciate the help on this one - thank you!

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - sorry ... I think the run is good.  The analysis shows them being in FT status but it looks like they are currently in FT status but not during the month in which they are receiving the 2B.  It would be helpful if in the future, if we can, to show their classes on the analysis as they were in that month to avoid this type of confusion. I appreciate the help on this one - thank you!
            Hide
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

             Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            Thanks you for confirming,

             

            Can you please Create a WD ticket for the above classes as per month requirement. so we can start on the same.

             

             

            Show
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -  Hi Jennifer Leugers , Thanks you for confirming,   Can you please Create a WD ticket for the above classes as per month requirement. so we can start on the same.    
            Hide
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) added a comment -

            Closing this ticket

            Show
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) added a comment - Closing this ticket

              People

              Assignee:
              jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers
              Reporter:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Account Executive:
              Yamilka Coca (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              9 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 2h Original Estimate - 2h
                  2h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 14.5h
                  14.5h