Hi Jennifer Leugers,

Below employee's correction were made yesterday.The correction codes given for these employees where 1G.

1. WINFIELD HUNTER
2. RICKY DANTZLER
3. DONALD DANIELS
4. JAMES CONDER
5. JACK SMITH
6. DON FRANTZ
7. ROBERT BENFIELD

On comparing with Yesterday's run('2/19/2018 10:51:50 PM') and latest run('2/20/2018 10.41.03 AM') only difference is these employees who have been added with code 1G.

Can you please let us know which employees defaulted back.

All - we need the previously attached file to be uploaded again and the forms to be re-run (and please verify they do not default back to 1G). Also, within the attached, one individual has 1H/2A for all 12 months BUT they were on the client's plan at some point in 2017 so they want a form for them and want the boxes checked for those months under Section III (even though we know we can't use the 1G code for partial months so the codes will remain 1H/2A). So for employee Winfield Hunger, we need Section III checked for Jan-Sep.

Hi Jennifer Leugers

We have imported the previous attached sheet ACA 1095C Correction Import Template 2.8.18.zip and re-run the report.
For employee "Winfield Hunger" we have specifically excluded him from deletion as his correction codes are 1H/2A.Also we have made his Part III correction to show Jan-Sep marked for him and his spouse.

Please refer run dated "2/21/2018 11:08:58 PM" for verification. We have verified all employees provided in correction sheet.No one had defaulted back to 1G and it will not happen hence forth for any run,unless the correction codes provided are 1G.

However,looking at the data of employee "Winfield Hunger", we think that this employee should get 1G as he is retired employee with benefits in 2017.This employee's enrollment data shows that this employee is enrolled with spouse in ACA Plan from Jan-Sept and from Oct,only employee is enrolled.

So his should be 1G for whole year with Part 3 marked as EE will be marked for all 12 months and his spouse will be marked from Jan-Sept.
It might happen that this employee gets rejected during IRS submission as his codes are 1H/2A with part 3 marked.
Please let us know your views on this.

NOTE: There is discrepancy related to Last name.Please refer last tab of Analysis report for more details.Please get them corrected before IRS submission.

Hi all - getting a server error when trying to load the new Part III file. Please load tonight and verify those individuals with a 1H / 2A but where the clients have months checked under Part III are showing (and make sure they are not showing as 1G). I've already loaded Part III but am attaching both herein for your review. Thanks!

Hi Jennifer Leugers,

Due to null value in month start date,it was throwing an error.We have noted this in our learning and will work on it after execution.

We have imported the files and re-run the forms.
As per system implementation, Part III data is combined from system and correction data.So system does not unmark the check box(if checkbox is marked as per system enrollment data),if month value is 0.
While checking the file,there were records where spouse was marked for months where employee is not marked.

We have re-run the report.Please refer latest run "2/23/2018 4:39:53 AM" for verification.
However in case if you require Part III marked considering only correction data and not combination of system + correction, then refer run dated "2/23/2018 3:45:27 AM".In this run,system generated part III is not considered.

We have checked all employees with 1H/2A and correction data.No employee has defaulted to 1G.

CC:Smita Pawar,Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar