Details

    • Type: Support Activity
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Labels:
      None
    • Support Task Type:
      ACA IRS Report
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Company:
      Yuba City
    • Categories:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Client

      Description

      NA

        Attachments

        1. David_Tarr_Enroll Now.png
          David_Tarr_Enroll Now.png
          148 kB
        2. Paletta_Jason_Enroll Now.png
          Paletta_Jason_Enroll Now.png
          155 kB
        3. screenshot-1.png
          screenshot-1.png
          107 kB
        4. screenshot-2.png
          screenshot-2.png
          24 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            1095C for Yuba is ready to run. Thanks!

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - 1095C for Yuba is ready to run. Thanks!
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            This group has been run. Please refer run dated "12/26/2017 12:55:44 AM" for verification.

            Note: Measurement and stability rules were set in this company but where not applicable for year 2017.

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , This group has been run. Please refer run dated "12/26/2017 12:55:44 AM" for verification. Note : Measurement and stability rules were set in this company but where not applicable for year 2017.
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - I removed the PERS_BlueShield_HMO plan from the customization as it should not be included in the ACA calculations. When I did that, almost all of the employees in class PS and POA changed from a 1A to a 1E which is what I expected to see. However, there are a handful of employees for a single month in the POA class that are showing 1A. When I do a QE for those months, I do not see why they are getting a 1A. Please review and advise. Thanks!

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - I removed the PERS_BlueShield_HMO plan from the customization as it should not be included in the ACA calculations. When I did that, almost all of the employees in class PS and POA changed from a 1A to a 1E which is what I expected to see. However, there are a handful of employees for a single month in the POA class that are showing 1A. When I do a QE for those months, I do not see why they are getting a 1A. Please review and advise. Thanks!
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            These employees are getting 1A in the months they were terminated.In this scenario,employee has a plan for whole month in which they were termed,but their sub-rate got terminated on the day in which they were terminated.So these plans become eligible to the employee with $0 cost for that month as we check the cost on end of the month.

            I raised an QE of event date having date post their termination on two employees from above list and enroll now shows ACA plans with $0 cost.Please find attached screenshot.

            David Tarr : Inactive from 11/7/2017

            Jason Paletta : Inactive from 05/02/2017

            Please correct the codes of these employees if required.

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , These employees are getting 1A in the months they were terminated.In this scenario,employee has a plan for whole month in which they were termed,but their sub-rate got terminated on the day in which they were terminated.So these plans become eligible to the employee with $0 cost for that month as we check the cost on end of the month. I raised an QE of event date having date post their termination on two employees from above list and enroll now shows ACA plans with $0 cost.Please find attached screenshot. David Tarr : Inactive from 11/7/2017 Jason Paletta : Inactive from 05/02/2017 Please correct the codes of these employees if required.
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - I added in eight new forms on the Corrections tab for Retirees that need to be added to the run. I re-ran the forms with the user correction checked and they are not showing up. Could you please look into this? Retirees are listed on the attached screenshot.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - I added in eight new forms on the Corrections tab for Retirees that need to be added to the run. I re-ran the forms with the user correction checked and they are not showing up. Could you please look into this? Retirees are listed on the attached screenshot.
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Smita Pawar,

            Please look into this and advise.

            CC:Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Smita Pawar , Please look into this and advise. CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            While doing correction corresponding EIN was not selected, hence Retiree employees were not included in the
            previous run. We have selected EIN's for below mentioned employee.

            1.Bills, Robert
            2.Blevins, Jon
            3.Flores, Elias
            4.Garrisi Garland
            5.Marler Gary
            6.Mathews James
            7.Rose Michael
            8.Smith, Guy

            Now these employees are in latest run.
            Please refer latest run '3/22/2018 2:52:12 AM' to download report.

            Thanks!!

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , While doing correction corresponding EIN was not selected, hence Retiree employees were not included in the previous run. We have selected EIN's for below mentioned employee. 1.Bills, Robert 2.Blevins, Jon 3.Flores, Elias 4.Garrisi Garland 5.Marler Gary 6.Mathews James 7.Rose Michael 8.Smith, Guy Now these employees are in latest run. Please refer latest run '3/22/2018 2:52:12 AM' to download report. Thanks!!
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - why is Kerri Julian not in the last two runs? I don't see anything that changed her record but she isn't included in the run from 3/21 or 3/22.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - why is Kerri Julian not in the last two runs? I don't see anything that changed her record but she isn't included in the run from 3/21 or 3/22.
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Ramya Tantry,

            Could you please look into same

            Thanks,
            Smita

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Ramya Tantry , Could you please look into same Thanks, Smita
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            EE Kerri Julian's status was changed to retired on 11/1/2017.
            As per system implementation,We mark the employee part time from the following month of termination or retirement.
            Due to this,if any employee is termed/retired on 1st day of the month,then for that month they will get 1A/1E code if offer is present and 2B/2C as per enrollment/offer.
            As termination happened on 1st day of the month and she had a retiree offer for Nov month. she was earlier furnished a form in previous runs.
            But as mentioned in a comment of Town of Cary (Click here for comment), if an employee is retired,then that employee should have 1H/2A irrespective of retiree offer.
            Same explanation is also given for JE-Dunn (Click here for comment)
            We have incorporated this change in the system and as this employee had retiree offer, she got 1H/2A for all 12 months which caused her report to be deleted from the run.

            However, we have added this employee in latest run.Please refer latest run for verification.
            Also please let us know what should be the behavior of the system,in case of this scenario.

            CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Smita Pawar

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , EE Kerri Julian's status was changed to retired on 11/1/2017. As per system implementation,We mark the employee part time from the following month of termination or retirement. Due to this,if any employee is termed/retired on 1st day of the month,then for that month they will get 1A/1E code if offer is present and 2B/2C as per enrollment/offer. As termination happened on 1st day of the month and she had a retiree offer for Nov month. she was earlier furnished a form in previous runs. But as mentioned in a comment of Town of Cary ( Click here for comment ), if an employee is retired,then that employee should have 1H/2A irrespective of retiree offer. Same explanation is also given for JE-Dunn ( Click here for comment ) We have incorporated this change in the system and as this employee had retiree offer, she got 1H/2A for all 12 months which caused her report to be deleted from the run. However, we have added this employee in latest run. Please refer latest run for verification. Also please let us know what should be the behavior of the system,in case of this scenario. CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Smita Pawar
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            All - this doesn't make sense to me though because she was in previous runs after she was already changed to Retiree. So why was she in the previous runs?

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - All - this doesn't make sense to me though because she was in previous runs after she was already changed to Retiree. So why was she in the previous runs?
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            When an employee has only retiree offer, they should get 1H/2A for those months.

            When this scenario was first found in Town of Cary,we made changes in this company to furnish the forms.

            Later on same scenario was found in JE-Dunn.So we incorporated this change in the system. As Yuba City's report was run before we incorporated the changes,this employee came in previous runs.

            Please refer the links given in my previous comment for more details.

             CC:Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Smita Pawar

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , When an employee has only retiree offer, they should get 1H/2A for those months. When this scenario was first found in Town of Cary,we made changes in this company to furnish the forms. Later on same scenario was found in JE-Dunn.So we incorporated this change in the system. As Yuba City's report was run before we incorporated the changes,this employee came in previous runs. Please refer the links given in my previous comment for more details.  CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Smita Pawar
            Hide
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) added a comment -

            Closing this ticket

            Show
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) added a comment - Closing this ticket

              People

              Assignee:
              jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers
              Reporter:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Account Executive:
              Ashley Marra (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 8h 50m
                  8h 50m