Hi Jennifer Leugers,

We will provide affected employees PDF's of Austin,DMA and Del Norte by tomorrow EOD as we need to do some manual back-end changes to furnish the same.All these PDF's will be marked as Corrected.

All it looks like Long is still incorrect; there are still a lot of 1Es showing on their analysis. Please look into this ASAP.

We are also showing some 1E / blanks - is that due to their premiums being over the FPL amounts?

Hi Jennifer Leugers,

There are 1E's because their employee cost is greater than FPL amount.We have verified some of the employees.
1. Karen L An :- Jan-Aug : 1A/2C , Sept-Dec : 1E/2C
Rates of ACA plan changed from Sept.This minimum rate($146.08) is greater than FPL amount.

2. Aaron M Morris : Jan-Dec : 1E/2C
Minimum Employee cost($454.22) is greater than FPL amount.

3. Destry J. Atkinson: Jan-Dec : 1E/Blank, Line15 : $454.22
Employee's salary is set in Benefit salary.However,on ACA Parameters page, salary to be considered is set as W2 wages.
As per implementation, if W2 wages on employee payroll is blank,we consider gross annual salary by default. Gross annual salary is also 0,so safe harbor cost comes up as 0.As employee cost is greater than 0,line 16 comes up as blank.

NOTE: Please verify ACA Parameters as which to salary is to be considered. For some of the employees,benefit salary is set as 0.

Closing this ticket