-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Rejected
-
Priority:
High
-
Resolution: Cancelled
-
Component/s: BenAdmin
-
Labels:None
-
Module:BenAdmin - Enrollment
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Item State:Development - In Analysis
-
Issue Importance:Can Wait
-
Sprint:WT Sprint 32-Bugs
Henny Penny for HSPl
Stage
- make a LIFE plan - this is auto enrolled plan - have the customization as per the attached screenshot [you may do it as flat amount or salary multiple]
- assign rates / or do not assign it
- make plan eligible for newly added employee and go on employee's enroll now screen
Actual Result : Employee is getting auto enrolled in the plan with maximum amount !
I was expecting employee will get auto enrolled in the plan with the lowest coverage offered flat amount which is 2000 in this case
Employee got enrolled with 50000 which is the maximum amount [min = 1000]
When this I tried with range flat amount - Rage is 2000 3000 4000 . Min = 1000 Max = 5000 then employee got auto enrolled in the same plan with cost 2000 which is the min cost in the range flat amounts
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Issue Importance | Must Have [ 11800 ] |
Assignee | Satya [ ID10004 ] | Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] |
Issue Importance | Must Have [ 11800 ] | Good To Have [ 11802 ] |
Issue Importance | Good To Have [ 11802 ] | Can Wait [ 11801 ] |
Assignee | Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] | Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] |
Severity | Complex [ 13103 ] |
Assignee | Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] | Abhilash Warkari [ abhilash.warkari ] |
Developer | Abhilash Warkari [ abhilash.warkari ] |
Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) |
Remaining Estimate | 0h [ 0 ] | |
Time Spent | 2h [ 7200 ] | |
Worklog Id | 59477 [ 59477 ] |
Time Spent | 2h [ 7200 ] | 2.25h [ 8100 ] |
Worklog Id | 59537 [ 59537 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 2h
-
Issue Analyssis
Scenario observation
debugging
discussion with jyoti
Time Spent | 2.25h [ 8100 ] | 2.75h [ 9900 ] |
Worklog Id | 60315 [ 60315 ] |
Time Spent | 2.75h [ 9900 ] | 5.75h [ 20700 ] |
Worklog Id | 60364 [ 60364 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 3h
-
Debugging code .
Discussion with jyoti.
Component/s | BenAdmin [ 10601 ] | |
Sprint | WT Sprint 32-Bugs [ 76 ] | |
Original Estimate | 0h [ 0 ] |
Resolution | Won't Fix [ 2 ] | |
Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Rejected [ 10004 ] |
Assignee | Abhilash Warkari [ abhilash.warkari ] | Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] |
Dev Due Date | 05/Jul/2017 |
Time Spent | 5.75h [ 20700 ] | 6.25h [ 22500 ] |
Worklog Id | 61783 [ 61783 ] |
Remaining Estimate | 0h [ 0 ] | 0.25h [ 900 ] |
Time Spent | 6.25h [ 22500 ] | 6h [ 21600 ] |
Worklog Id | 61783 [ 61783 ] |
Worklog Id | 61783 [ 61783 ] |
Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times |
---|
|
368d 23h 29m | 1 |
|
5d 19h 43m | 1 |
Hi Alankar Chavan,
As per discussion with Amruta Lohiya, when the plan is auto enrolled and customised as offered amount, then in this case Maximum coverage ,Minimum coverage and Flat amount should be same and there should be only one flat amount in the offered amount section. This is ideal customization for this scenario.
We have scanned all companyies on production and found City of Oceanside is having Offer Amount plus core plan customization stated as above.
You can refer following plans :
-Basic Life - Class 3
-Basic Life - Class 4
-Basic Life - Class 5
-Basic AD&D - Class 3
-Basic AD&D - Class 4
-Basic AD&D - Class 5
-CalPERS Beneficiary
-CAPF
-CLEA Long Term Disability
So as per current system implemenation this is wrong customization.
Thanks and Regards,
Abhilash Warkari
CC : Jyoti Mayne, Umesh Kadam