Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Export
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Company:
      LONG Building Technologies
    • Item State:
      Stage QA - Production Deployment on Hold
    • Issue Importance:
      Must Have
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 37 - Enhancement
    • Severity:
      Simple
    • Reported by Customer:
      Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker

      Description

      Now that we are starting to become a system of report for some of our clients, more is being asked in terms of reporting. Currently WT is unable to send a report that only sends changes to a EE record.
      For a work around, we have to create a global template to meet this request. So what we have to do is create a template for each field name and map one field at a time, in order to get the results that we are looking for.
      This seems like it could be a simple report that could put together, but currently the way the report is being put together it very time consuming. To make any updated or to add on to the report, it makes it even more challenging.
      If DEV could come up with a better solution to create this report, then that would be great!

      edi- 2052 for reference Group Feed: Long Vehicle Old Format
      cc Abhay Patil

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            Vinayak.Kulkarni Vinayak Kulkarni (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker

            I guess we have similar request WT-9268 raised by Cindy. Although this seems to be simple change but for development's point of view, it is big change in export logic and we need to analyse this.

            We will let you know once we plan this analysis in upcoming sprint. Thanks.

            Show
            Vinayak.Kulkarni Vinayak Kulkarni (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker I guess we have similar request WT-9268 raised by Cindy. Although this seems to be simple change but for development's point of view, it is big change in export logic and we need to analyse this. We will let you know once we plan this analysis in upcoming sprint. Thanks.
            Hide
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment -

            Vinayak Kulkarni We need to discuss this with Dave once he is here next week. Please keep this enhancement on your agenda. Also if you can keep estimation ready for the same then it will be great.

            CC-Gaurav Sodani

            Show
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment - Vinayak Kulkarni We need to discuss this with Dave once he is here next week. Please keep this enhancement on your agenda. Also if you can keep estimation ready for the same then it will be great. CC- Gaurav Sodani
            Hide
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment -

            Rajendra Pawar If the flag is not selected then no matter if the field is changed or not it will populate correct?

            Cindy Wibbing If my above assumption is correct then I think this looks good. Please review the attached document and provide your go ahead for the same.

            Show
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment - Rajendra Pawar If the flag is not selected then no matter if the field is changed or not it will populate correct? Cindy Wibbing If my above assumption is correct then I think this looks good. Please review the attached document and provide your go ahead for the same.
            Hide
            rajendra.pawar Rajendra Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Yes Amit Thorve, you are right, If flag(Populate Only If changed.) is not selected then system will not check for mapped field changed value.

            Vinayak Kulkarni

            Show
            rajendra.pawar Rajendra Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Yes Amit Thorve , you are right, If flag( Populate Only If changed. ) is not selected then system will not check for mapped field changed value. Vinayak Kulkarni
            Hide
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited
            Show
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited I have attached Test scenarios Test Cases__WT-10279.xls . CC- Rakesh Roy Hrishikesh Deshpande Aniruddha Dev
            Hide
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified this Enhancement on LB ,It is working as expected.
            Ready for Stage Deployment.
            CC-Aniruddha DevHrishikesh DeshpandeRakesh Roy

            Show
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment - Verified this Enhancement on LB ,It is working as expected. Ready for Stage Deployment. CC- Aniruddha Dev Hrishikesh Deshpande Rakesh Roy
            Hide
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            This enhancement is verified,It is working as expected.
            Ready for production Deployment.
            CC-Aniruddha DevHrishikesh DeshpandeRakesh Roy

            Show
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment - This enhancement is verified,It is working as expected. Ready for production Deployment. CC- Aniruddha Dev Hrishikesh Deshpande Rakesh Roy
            Hide
            nwalker Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker (Inactive) added a comment -

            hi Swapnil Eksambekar Do we have an update on this?
            thx

            Show
            nwalker Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker (Inactive) added a comment - hi Swapnil Eksambekar Do we have an update on this? thx
            Hide
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker,

            As of now,Open enrollment is going on,All enhancements are kept on Production - on hold,Once it gets approval ,will move into production.

            Thanks,
            Swapnil Eksambekar

            CC-Hrishikesh DeshpandeAniruddha DevRajendra PawarRakesh RoyVinayak Kulkarni

            Show
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker , As of now,Open enrollment is going on,All enhancements are kept on Production - on hold,Once it gets approval ,will move into production. Thanks, Swapnil Eksambekar CC- Hrishikesh Deshpande Aniruddha Dev Rajendra Pawar Rakesh Roy Vinayak Kulkarni
            Hide
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment -

            Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker How badly you need this report? If this is must have I will get it approved by Dave.

            Show
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment - Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker How badly you need this report? If this is must have I will get it approved by Dave.
            Hide
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Yamilka Coca,

            Verified Populate only if changed flag on Production,now we can export only those values that changed for demoghraphic mapped fields.It is working as expected,Please check this at your end and close it.

            Thanks,
            Swapnil Eksambekar

            CC-Hrishikesh DeshpandeRakesh Roy

            Show
            swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Yamilka Coca , Verified Populate only if changed flag on Production,now we can export only those values that changed for demoghraphic mapped fields.It is working as expected,Please check this at your end and close it. Thanks, Swapnil Eksambekar CC- Hrishikesh Deshpande Rakesh Roy

              People

              Assignee:
              swapnil.eksambekar Swapnil Eksambekar (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              nwalker Nathaniel Cornejo-Walker (Inactive)
              Account Executive:
              Yamilka Coca (Inactive)
              EDI Analyst 1:
              Cindy Wibbing (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Rajendra Pawar (Inactive)
              QA:
              Aniruddha Dev (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              7 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 140h
                  140h
                  Remaining:
                  Time Spent - 66.25h Remaining Estimate - 73.75h
                  73.75h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 66.25h Remaining Estimate - 73.75h
                  66.25h