Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-10544

HSA with age banded customization with no contingent eligibility ER coverage issue for election changes

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Production Complete
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Stage
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 34-Bugs

      Description

      We are having an issue with the Mass Transit for COSB, when we go through EE Brigit Vargas and elect the coverage for effective date of 5/1/2017 the plan contributions appear correctly. The plan is set up for monthly EE and ER contributions. When we go into the same EE and make a change for 7/1, updating the EE contribution to 10.00 per month (60.00 yearly) and do not click the enroll button the correct amounts appear. As soon as we click the Enroll button the employer contribution changes to 20.00 which is incorrect, it should also show the 60.00 annual amount.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne created issue -
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Assignee Vijay Siddha [ vijays ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Code Reviewed By Jyoti Mayne [ 11910 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Code Review Date 10/Aug/2017
            Dev Due Date 10/Aug/2017
            Hide
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment -

            Hi Prasad Pise,

            Please find following 3C's:

            Concern: We are having an issue with the Mass Transit for COSB, when we go through EE Brigit Vargas and elect the coverage for effective date of 5/1/2017 the plan contributions appear correctly. The plan is set up for monthly EE and ER contributions. When we go into the same EE and make a change for 7/1, updating the EE contribution to 10.00 per month (60.00 yearly) and do not click the enroll button the correct amounts appear. As soon as we click the Enroll button the employer contribution changes to 20.00 which is incorrect, it should also show the 60.00 annual amount.

            Cause: Mass Transit Plan is flexible spending template not transit template plan. Plan is having age banded coverage.
            Generally for age banded flex plan, it is necessary to add contingent eligibility of Health plans.
            But here there is scenario specific issue in calculating ER coverage for age banded plan with no contingent eligibility.

            Correction: We have fixed code for this.

            Cc: Satya, Gaurav Sodani, Debbie Kulling

            Show
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - Hi Prasad Pise , Please find following 3C's: Concern: We are having an issue with the Mass Transit for COSB, when we go through EE Brigit Vargas and elect the coverage for effective date of 5/1/2017 the plan contributions appear correctly. The plan is set up for monthly EE and ER contributions. When we go into the same EE and make a change for 7/1, updating the EE contribution to 10.00 per month (60.00 yearly) and do not click the enroll button the correct amounts appear. As soon as we click the Enroll button the employer contribution changes to 20.00 which is incorrect, it should also show the 60.00 annual amount. Cause: Mass Transit Plan is flexible spending template not transit template plan. Plan is having age banded coverage. Generally for age banded flex plan, it is necessary to add contingent eligibility of Health plans. But here there is scenario specific issue in calculating ER coverage for age banded plan with no contingent eligibility. Correction: We have fixed code for this. Cc: Satya , Gaurav Sodani , Debbie Kulling
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            Hide
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment -
            Show
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - Cc: Hrishikesh Deshpande , Rashmita Dudhe
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Prasad Pise [ prasadp ]
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasad Pise [ prasadp ] Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 10/Aug/17 04:51 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3.5h
               

              code debugging, fix and testing, LB Check-in and call with Debbie

            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Hsa Age change.png [ 58291 ]
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            I have verified this issue and consider below scenarios:
            Customization: Flex Plan with no contingency
            Cost coverage setting:Age Wise Coverage? ER coverage: 120

            1]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed
            2]Add new employee with effective date 05/01/2017 : He got 80 ER coverage ------ Passed
            3]Add new employee with effective date 09/01/2017 : He got 40 ER coverage ------ Passed
            4]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage
            with QE 05/01/2017 change coverage and again enrolled He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed

            for continue election
            working fine as expected.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - I have verified this issue and consider below scenarios: Customization: Flex Plan with no contingency Cost coverage setting:Age Wise Coverage? ER coverage: 120 1]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed 2]Add new employee with effective date 05/01/2017 : He got 80 ER coverage ------ Passed 3]Add new employee with effective date 09/01/2017 : He got 40 ER coverage ------ Passed 4]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage with QE 05/01/2017 change coverage and again enrolled He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed for continue election working fine as expected.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-10572 [ WT-10572 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 11/Aug/17 08:58 AM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               
              <No comment>
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 10h [ 36000 ]
            Original Estimate 10h [ 36000 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 10h [ 36000 ] 7h [ 25200 ]
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ]
            Worklog Id 71120 [ 71120 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 7h [ 25200 ] 6.5h [ 23400 ]
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ] 3.5h [ 12600 ]
            Worklog Id 71135 [ 71135 ]
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            I have verified this issue on Stage and consider below scenarios:
            Customization: Flex Plan with no contingency
            Cost coverage setting:Age Wise Coverage? ER coverage: 120
            1]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed
            2]Add new employee with effective date 05/01/2017 : He got 80 ER coverage ------ Passed
            3]Add new employee with effective date 09/01/2017 : He got 40 ER coverage ------ Passed
            4]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage
            with QE 05/01/2017 change coverage and again enrolled He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed
            for continue election
            working fine as expected.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - I have verified this issue on Stage and consider below scenarios: Customization: Flex Plan with no contingency Cost coverage setting:Age Wise Coverage? ER coverage: 120 1]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed 2]Add new employee with effective date 05/01/2017 : He got 80 ER coverage ------ Passed 3]Add new employee with effective date 09/01/2017 : He got 40 ER coverage ------ Passed 4]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage with QE 05/01/2017 change coverage and again enrolled He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed for continue election working fine as expected.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 11/Aug/17 11:13 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               
              <No comment>
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 6.5h [ 23400 ] 4.5h [ 16200 ]
            Time Spent 3.5h [ 12600 ] 5.5h [ 19800 ]
            Worklog Id 71171 [ 71171 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 4.5h [ 16200 ] 5.5h [ 19800 ]
            Time Spent 5.5h [ 19800 ] 4.5h [ 16200 ]
            Worklog Id 71120 [ 71120 ]
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) logged work - 11/Aug/17 12:34 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Internal discussion with Jyoti and Rashmita

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 5.5h [ 19800 ] 2h [ 7200 ]
            Time Spent 4.5h [ 16200 ] 8h [ 28800 ]
            Worklog Id 71563 [ 71563 ]
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Code Review Date 10/Aug/2017 10/Aug/2017
            Dev Due Date 10/Aug/2017 10/Aug/2017
            Developer Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 29/Aug/17 12:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               
              <No comment>
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            I have verified this issue on Production and consider below scenarios:
            Customization: Flex Plan with no contingency
            Cost coverage setting:Age Wise Coverage? ER coverage: 120
            1]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed
            2]Add new employee with effective date 05/01/2017 : He got 80 ER coverage ------ Passed
            3]Add new employee with effective date 09/01/2017 : He got 40 ER coverage ------ Passed
            4]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage
            with QE 05/01/2017 change coverage and again enrolled He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed
            for continue election
            working fine as expected.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - I have verified this issue on Production and consider below scenarios: Customization: Flex Plan with no contingency Cost coverage setting:Age Wise Coverage? ER coverage: 120 1]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed 2]Add new employee with effective date 05/01/2017 : He got 80 ER coverage ------ Passed 3]Add new employee with effective date 09/01/2017 : He got 40 ER coverage ------ Passed 4]Add new employee with effective date 01/01/2017 : He got 120 ER coverage with QE 05/01/2017 change coverage and again enrolled He got 120 ER coverage ------ Passed for continue election working fine as expected.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 2h [ 7200 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 8h [ 28800 ] 10h [ 36000 ]
            Worklog Id 74822 [ 74822 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            This is deployed and verified on Production,
            Kindly, Update Jira accordingly.

            Thanks,
            Rashmita

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - This is deployed and verified on Production, Kindly, Update Jira accordingly. Thanks, Rashmita
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ] Debbie Kulling [ dkulling ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New Stage [ 18443 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Jyoti Mayne made transition -
            Open In Development
            10s 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            18h 23m 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            4h 48m 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            18d 3h 8m 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            19m 5s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              dkulling Debbie Kulling
              Reporter:
              jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne
              Account Executive:
              Debbie Kulling
              Developer:
              Jyoti Mayne
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 10h
                  10h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 10h
                  10h