Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Production Complete
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Import
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Company:
      Wacker Neuson Corporation
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 36 - Bugs

      Description

      Template Name: Employee Ongoing New Hires

      Error Log: Import FailureExecuteImportDTS.AutomatedImportFile->ImportValidation.ImportData->ImportValidation.GetImportExportFieldsData An entry with the same key already exists.

      Getting reproduced for manual import.

      Needs to be taken on priority as next import will be failed.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) created issue -
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 05/Sep/17 01:07 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Issue analysis and reproduce

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 1.5h [ 5400 ]
            Worklog Id 76848 [ 76848 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            QA Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 07/Sep/17 02:10 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Analysis , understanding business logic and unit testing.

            Hide
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All ,

            Please find details as below ,

            Concern : Wacker Import Failed

            Cause : This issues is because code failure to check duplicate sequence if single file fields mapped on multiple DB fields with required flag set to "yes". This causes an issues to add duplicate value in hash table hence raising an error.

            Correction : We have provided code fix and its under review.

            Work Around : Mean while we have unchecked "is required" fields for "Original hire date" from template " Employee Ongoing New Hires".

            Impacted Area : None

            Test Scenario:

            • Map single template fields on multiple DB fields
            • Marked "IS Required" to checked.
            • Import succeeded if we marked Required fields for Multiple DB fields.

            Affected Files :

            • \App\BusinessLogic\ImportExportDTS\ImportValidation.vb

            Jaideep Vinchurkar Pleas have a review.

            Thanks !

            Show
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All , Please find details as below , Concern : Wacker Import Failed Cause : This issues is because code failure to check duplicate sequence if single file fields mapped on multiple DB fields with required flag set to "yes". This causes an issues to add duplicate value in hash table hence raising an error. Correction : We have provided code fix and its under review. Work Around : Mean while we have unchecked "is required" fields for "Original hire date" from template " Employee Ongoing New Hires". Impacted Area : None Test Scenario : Map single template fields on multiple DB fields Marked "IS Required" to checked. Import succeeded if we marked Required fields for Multiple DB fields. Affected Files : \App\BusinessLogic\ImportExportDTS\ImportValidation.vb Jaideep Vinchurkar Pleas have a review. Thanks !
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 1.5h [ 5400 ] 4.5h [ 16200 ]
            Worklog Id 77481 [ 77481 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 08/Sep/2017
            Code Reviewed By Jaideep Vinchurkar [ 11908 ]
            Dev Due Date 08/Sep/2017
            Sprint WT Sprint 36 - Bugs [ 84 ]
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Good to LB Checkin

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Good to LB Checkin
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Vishal Bajad,

            Verified on LB
            Company - City of durham for hspl.

            Verified following scenario's
            1)Map single template fields on multiple DB fields
            2)Marked "IS Required" to checked.
            3)Import succeeded if we marked Required fields for Multiple DB fields.

            This scenario worked fine when for sub template (Date of employment) is mapped to Date of employment and employee effective date with "Is required flag set to yes"
            Also reproduced issue on stage .

            But in additional We have verified for first name
            Sub template name -> FN
            FN is mapped to Employee first name and Employee full name.
            with is uniquee required flag to yes
            Import is failed - following is error log
            ErrorID : 0
            ErrorSource : ControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->WORKTERRAControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData_Isolated->WTIsolatedRoutines.Main->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData->ImportValidation.ImportData->ImportValidation.ProcessImportDataFile->ImportValidation.ProcessLineForBadRecord->ImportValidation.ValidateData
            ErrorMessage: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

            Same issue exists on stage also.
            Hence re-opening this jira.

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Vishal Bajad , Verified on LB Company - City of durham for hspl. Verified following scenario's 1)Map single template fields on multiple DB fields 2)Marked "IS Required" to checked. 3)Import succeeded if we marked Required fields for Multiple DB fields. This scenario worked fine when for sub template (Date of employment) is mapped to Date of employment and employee effective date with "Is required flag set to yes" Also reproduced issue on stage . But in additional We have verified for first name Sub template name -> FN FN is mapped to Employee first name and Employee full name. with is uniquee required flag to yes Import is failed - following is error log ErrorID : 0 ErrorSource : ControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->WORKTERRAControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData_Isolated->WTIsolatedRoutines.Main->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData->ImportValidation.ImportData->ImportValidation.ProcessImportDataFile->ImportValidation.ProcessLineForBadRecord->ImportValidation.ValidateData ErrorMessage: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. Same issue exists on stage also. Hence re-opening this jira. Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212)
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Hide
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hi All ,

            Please find details as below ,

            Concern : Wacker Import Failed , when First Name is mapped to Employee first name and Employee full name

            Cause : code failure to check Object Null if we mapped multiple fields

            Correction : Provided code fix and its under review.

            Impacted Area : Not able to import fields which is not exist in DB.

            Test Scenario:

            • First Name is mapped to Employee first name and Employee full name : No Error but only first name updated. Employee full name
            • First Name is mapped to Employee first name and Employee middle name : First Name and Middle is updated successfully.

            Affected Files :

            • App\BusinessLogic\ImportExportDTS\ImportValidation.vb

            Jaideep Vinchurkar Please have a review.

            Thanks !

            Show
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi All , Please find details as below , Concern : Wacker Import Failed , when First Name is mapped to Employee first name and Employee full name Cause : code failure to check Object Null if we mapped multiple fields Correction : Provided code fix and its under review. Impacted Area : Not able to import fields which is not exist in DB. Test Scenario : First Name is mapped to Employee first name and Employee full name : No Error but only first name updated. Employee full name First Name is mapped to Employee first name and Employee middle name : First Name and Middle is updated successfully. Affected Files : App\BusinessLogic\ImportExportDTS\ImportValidation.vb Jaideep Vinchurkar Please have a review. Thanks !
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 11/Sep/17 03:16 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               
              <No comment>
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 4.5h [ 16200 ] 7.5h [ 27000 ]
            Worklog Id 78092 [ 78092 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 08/Sep/2017 12/Sep/2017
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Good to LB checkin

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Good to LB checkin
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Production Due Date 19/Sep/2017
            Stage Due Date 18/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-18 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Vishal Bajad,

            Verified on LB
            Company - QA FDU, QA city of durham for hspl, QA caiso for hspl

            Verified following scenario's
            1)Map single template fields on multiple DB fields
            2)Marked "IS Required" to checked.
            3)Import succeeded if we marked Required fields for Multiple DB fields.

            • This scenario worked fine when for sub template (Date of employment) is mapped to Date of
              employment and employee effective date with "Is required flag set to yes"
            • When we map Employee First name to First name and middle name
              and at the same time Employee Date of employment is mapped to employee effective date and DOE- This scenario worked fine(Import done successful)
            • When Sub template name -> FN
              FN is mapped to Employee first name and Employee full name - Import done successully
            • When Employee FN mapped to Emp FN and Full name and at the same time Employee Date of employment is mapped to employee effective date and DOE - Import failed

            Error Log : ErrorID : 0
            ErrorSource : ControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->WORKTERRAControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData_Isolated->WTIsolatedRoutines.Main->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData->ImportValidation.ImportData->ImportValidation.ProcessImportDataFile->ImportValidation.ProcessLineForBadRecord->ImportValidation.ValidateData
            ErrorMessage: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

            Note : Verified by restoring company, Creating new template on mentioned company.

            Hence re-opening this jira.

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Vishal Bajad , Verified on LB Company - QA FDU, QA city of durham for hspl, QA caiso for hspl Verified following scenario's 1)Map single template fields on multiple DB fields 2)Marked "IS Required" to checked. 3)Import succeeded if we marked Required fields for Multiple DB fields. This scenario worked fine when for sub template (Date of employment) is mapped to Date of employment and employee effective date with "Is required flag set to yes" When we map Employee First name to First name and middle name and at the same time Employee Date of employment is mapped to employee effective date and DOE- This scenario worked fine(Import done successful) When Sub template name -> FN FN is mapped to Employee first name and Employee full name - Import done successully When Employee FN mapped to Emp FN and Full name and at the same time Employee Date of employment is mapped to employee effective date and DOE - Import failed Error Log : ErrorID : 0 ErrorSource : ControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->WORKTERRAControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData_Isolated->WTIsolatedRoutines.Main->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData->ImportValidation.ImportData->ImportValidation.ProcessImportDataFile->ImportValidation.ProcessLineForBadRecord->ImportValidation.ValidateData ErrorMessage: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. Note : Verified by restoring company, Creating new template on mentioned company. Hence re-opening this jira. Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 15/Sep/17 10:41 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              LB Re-testing

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 7.5h [ 27000 ] 9.5h [ 34200 ]
            Worklog Id 78954 [ 78954 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 08/Sep/2017 25/Sep/2017
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Stage Due Date 18/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-18 ] 27/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-27 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Production Due Date 19/Sep/2017 28/Sep/2017
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 20/Sep/17 02:22 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               
              <No comment>
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 9.5h [ 34200 ] 10.5h [ 37800 ]
            Worklog Id 80020 [ 80020 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is duplicated by WT-11201 [ WT-11201 ]
            Hide
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All ,

            Please find details as below ,

            Concern : Wacker Import Failed

            Cause : This issues is because code failure to check values for multiple mapped fields. Multiple mapped hash is getting filled with Zero index instead of that its should be filled as per mapped fields sequence. hence finding value with zero index raising an error.

            Correction : We have provided code fix and its under review.

            Test Scenario:

            • Map single or multiple template fields on multiple DB fields
            • Marked "IS Required" to checked.
            • Import succeeded if we marked Required fields for Multiple DB fields.

            Affected Files :

            • \App\BusinessLogic\ImportExportDTS\ImportValidation.vb

            Jaideep Vinchurkar Pleas have a review.

            Thanks !

            Show
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All , Please find details as below , Concern : Wacker Import Failed Cause : This issues is because code failure to check values for multiple mapped fields. Multiple mapped hash is getting filled with Zero index instead of that its should be filled as per mapped fields sequence. hence finding value with zero index raising an error. Correction : We have provided code fix and its under review. Test Scenario : Map single or multiple template fields on multiple DB fields Marked "IS Required" to checked. Import succeeded if we marked Required fields for Multiple DB fields. Affected Files : \App\BusinessLogic\ImportExportDTS\ImportValidation.vb Jaideep Vinchurkar Pleas have a review. Thanks !
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 22/Sep/17 12:36 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               
              <No comment>
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 10.5h [ 37800 ] 13.5h [ 48600 ]
            Worklog Id 80614 [ 80614 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ]
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Vishal Bajad,

            we do not required code change here. Here employee full name field was mapped as second field, which is a export field and should not be shown in import mapping screen.
            we have WT-11192 for such fields. Please revert your changes. If scenrio mentioned by Jayshree Nagpure is working with valid import field. no code fix is required for this issue.

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Vishal Bajad , we do not required code change here. Here employee full name field was mapped as second field, which is a export field and should not be shown in import mapping screen. we have WT-11192 for such fields. Please revert your changes. If scenrio mentioned by Jayshree Nagpure is working with valid import field. no code fix is required for this issue.
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 25/Sep/17 09:29 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               
              <No comment>
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 13.5h [ 48600 ] 14h [ 50400 ]
            Worklog Id 80994 [ 80994 ]
            Hide
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jayshree Nagpure ,

            I have verified with valid fields its working fine.Please verify.

            Thanks !

            Show
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jayshree Nagpure , I have verified with valid fields its working fine.Please verify. Thanks !
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Vishal Bajad,

            Verified below scenario :
            1)Marked Date of Employee as required - Pass
            2)Mapped DOE with DOE and Effective date - Pass
            3)Marked all mandatory field as Is Required for Demographics import - Import done successfully
            4)Also verified Spouse and Child data with "IS required" as YES - Pass
            Working fine

            Hence marking item state as Ready fo stage

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Vishal Bajad , Verified below scenario : 1)Marked Date of Employee as required - Pass 2)Mapped DOE with DOE and Effective date - Pass 3)Marked all mandatory field as Is Required for Demographics import - Import done successfully 4)Also verified Spouse and Child data with "IS required" as YES - Pass Working fine Hence marking item state as Ready fo stage Thanks, Jayshree
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Production Due Date 28/Sep/2017 12/Oct/2017
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            verified on stage
            Company - ASML for hspl

            Verified below scenario :
            1)Marked Date of Employee as required - Pass
            2)Mapped DOE with DOE and Effective date - Pass
            3)Marked all mandatory field as Is Required for Demographics import - Import done successfully
            4)Also verified Spouse and Child data with "IS required" as YES - Pass
            5))Marked Date of Employee as required - pass date of Employment as blank - Pass

            Working fine
            Hence marking item state as Ready fo Production

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - verified on stage Company - ASML for hspl Verified below scenario : 1)Marked Date of Employee as required - Pass 2)Mapped DOE with DOE and Effective date - Pass 3)Marked all mandatory field as Is Required for Demographics import - Import done successfully 4)Also verified Spouse and Child data with "IS required" as YES - Pass 5))Marked Date of Employee as required - pass date of Employment as blank - Pass Working fine Hence marking item state as Ready fo Production Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 29/Sep/17 08:20 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Stage testing

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 14h [ 50400 ] 15h [ 54000 ]
            Worklog Id 82576 [ 82576 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is duplicated by WT-11403 [ WT-11403 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 11/Oct/17 01:04 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Production testing

            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            verified on Production
            Company - ASML for hspl

            Verified below scenario :
            1)Marked Date of Employee as required - Pass
            2)Mapped DOE with DOE and Effective date - Pass
            3)Marked all mandatory field as Is Required for Demographics import - Import done successfully
            4)Also verified Spouse and Child data with "IS required" as YES - Pass
            5))Marked Date of Employee as required - pass date of Employment as blank - Pass

            Working fine
            Hence marking item state as Production complete

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - verified on Production Company - ASML for hspl Verified below scenario : 1)Marked Date of Employee as required - Pass 2)Mapped DOE with DOE and Effective date - Pass 3)Marked all mandatory field as Is Required for Demographics import - Import done successfully 4)Also verified Spouse and Child data with "IS required" as YES - Pass 5))Marked Date of Employee as required - pass date of Employment as blank - Pass Working fine Hence marking item state as Production complete Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 15h [ 54000 ] 16.5h [ 59400 ]
            Worklog Id 84287 [ 84287 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            1d 20h 28m 1
            Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Reopen in Local
            5d 5h 43m 2
            Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made transition -
            Reopen in Local In Development
            2d 15h 2
            Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            10d 11h 53m 3
            Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            1d 23h 14m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            13d 21h 25m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            3h 14m 1

              People

              Assignee:
              jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Vishal Bajad (Inactive)
              QA:
              Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 16.5h
                  16.5h