Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-11185

Employee data gets saved with wrong mode when multiple modes going on

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Bug Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - EDS
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Company:
      All Clients/Multiple Clients
    • Item State:
      LB QA - On Hold
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 40 - Bugs

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) logged work - 20/Sep/17 01:52 AM
          • Time Spent:
            6h
             
            <No comment>
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) created issue -
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Assignee Vijay Siddha [ vijays ] Akshay Mukkawar [ akshay.mukkawar ]
          Show
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) added a comment - CC: Satya Gaurav Sodani Swapnil Pandhare
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Developer Akshay Mukkawar [ akshay.mukkawar ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Dev Due Date 21/Sep/2017
          Hide
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Akshay Mukkawar,

          Please check scenario with and with out requires verification.

          Thanks,
          Sheetal Bodhale

          Show
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Akshay Mukkawar , Please check scenario with and with out requires verification. Thanks, Sheetal Bodhale
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Priority Medium [ 3 ] High [ 2 ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
          Time Spent 8h [ 28800 ]
          Worklog Id 79986 [ 79986 ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) logged work - 21/Sep/17 01:30 AM
          • Time Spent:
            8h
             

            code debugging
            SP debugging

          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) logged work - 22/Sep/17 02:12 AM
          • Time Spent:
            8h
             

            unit testing
            Sp changes
            code review

          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 8h [ 28800 ] 16h [ 57600 ]
          Worklog Id 80376 [ 80376 ]
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Link This issue relates to WT-11021 [ WT-11021 ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 16h [ 57600 ] 22h [ 79200 ]
          Worklog Id 80635 [ 80635 ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Code Reviewed By Swapnil Pandhare [ 11900 ]
          Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Dev Due Date 21/Sep/2017 25/Sep/2017
          Hide
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          Please find following 3C's:
          Concern: Employee data gets saved with wrong mode when multiple modes going on
          Cause: Code was wrong when multiple modes
          Correction: We have modify Sp for this.

          *Impacted Areas: *
          Employee login

          Files Affected
          1) .OES_SP_GetEmployeeEffectiveDate

          Please consider following scenarios for Impact Testing:

          1) Single mode for Employee login
          2) Multiple modes for Employee login

          Thanks,
          Akshay Mukkawar
          --------------------------
          CC:Swapnil Pandhare,Sheetal Bodhale,Satya

          Show
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) added a comment - Please find following 3C's: Concern : Employee data gets saved with wrong mode when multiple modes going on Cause : Code was wrong when multiple modes Correction : We have modify Sp for this. *Impacted Areas: * Employee login Files Affected 1) .OES_SP_GetEmployeeEffectiveDate Please consider following scenarios for Impact Testing: 1) Single mode for Employee login 2) Multiple modes for Employee login Thanks, Akshay Mukkawar -------------------------- CC: Swapnil Pandhare , Sheetal Bodhale , Satya
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 22h [ 79200 ] 26h [ 93600 ]
          Worklog Id 80986 [ 80986 ]
          khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Akshay Mukkawar [ akshay.mukkawar ] Hrishikesh Deshpande [ hrishikesh.deshpande ]
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Hrishikesh Deshpande [ hrishikesh.deshpande ] Rutuja Chilwar [ rutuja.chilwar ]
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
          Production Due Date 28/Sep/2017
          QA Rutuja Chilwar [ rutuja.chilwar ]
          Stage Due Date 27/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-27 ]
          hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
          Hide
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Rutuja Chilwar,

          Please consider following scenarios too:

          1)Get Employee with any two modes. And effective date of one mode should be lesser than other mode.
          Then system will show lesser effective date on employee forms.That is correct.
          But while saving data, it is saving data with wrong mode.We have fixed this.For that you need to check from back end.Please refer below tables,
          select EnrollMentModeID, from Employee
          select * from EnrollmentMode
          *
          2)Set requires verification to 'yes' for mode with greater effective date.It should not pend the data of
          lesser effective date mode as for the mode verification is 'No'

          Please let me know any additional details are required.

          CC:Swapnil EksambekarSatyaAkshay MukkawarGaurav Sodani

          Thanks,
          Sheetal Bodhale

          Show
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Rutuja Chilwar , Please consider following scenarios too: 1)Get Employee with any two modes. And effective date of one mode should be lesser than other mode. Then system will show lesser effective date on employee forms.That is correct. But while saving data, it is saving data with wrong mode.We have fixed this.For that you need to check from back end.Please refer below tables, select EnrollMentModeID, from Employee select * from EnrollmentMode * 2)Set requires verification to 'yes' for mode with greater effective date.It should not pend the data of lesser effective date mode as for the mode verification is 'No' Please let me know any additional details are required. CC: Swapnil Eksambekar Satya Akshay Mukkawar Gaurav Sodani Thanks, Sheetal Bodhale
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 26h [ 93600 ] 26.5h [ 95400 ]
          Worklog Id 81069 [ 81069 ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 25/Sep/17 12:48 PM
          • Time Spent:
            0.25h
             
            <No comment>
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 26.5h [ 95400 ] 26.75h [ 96300 ]
          Worklog Id 81083 [ 81083 ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) logged work - 25/Sep/17 08:58 PM
          • Time Spent:
            4h
             

            Unit testing
            code review
            jira update

          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) logged work - 26/Sep/17 12:17 AM
          • Time Spent:
            0.5h
             

            scenario discussion with Rutuja
            updated the comments

          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 26.75h [ 96300 ] 27.25h [ 98100 ]
          Worklog Id 81610 [ 81610 ]
          Hide
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Hello Sheetal Bodhale ,

          Verified above mentioned point for following scenarios :
          Scenario #1
          customization : OE

          1. Add new Employee
          OE start date : 09/01/2017 End Date : 09/302017
          date of Employment : 01/012017
          Effective date : 01/01/2018
          Status :PASS

          Scenario #2
          customization : OE + New hire mode
          2. Add new Employee
          OE start date : 09/01/2017 End Date : 09/302017
          Date of Employment : 09/26/2017
          Effective date :09/26/2017
          Status : Pass

          Scenario #3
          customization : OE + Qualifying Event
          OE start date : 09/01/2017 End Date : 09/302017
          Date of Employment : 01/012017
          raise multiple qualifying events ,
          lesser effective date is not reflecting .
          Status : FAILED

          Scenario #4
          customization : OE + New hire mode , Set required verification Yes for new hire mode
          Add new Employee
          OE start date : 09/01/2017 End Date : 09/302017
          Date of Employment : 09/26/2017
          Effective date :09/26/2017
          data going for approval for new hire mode
          Status: PASS

          3rd scenario is getting failed

          CC - Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande

          Show
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hello Sheetal Bodhale , Verified above mentioned point for following scenarios : Scenario #1 customization : OE 1. Add new Employee OE start date : 09/01/2017 End Date : 09/302017 date of Employment : 01/012017 Effective date : 01/01/2018 Status :PASS Scenario #2 customization : OE + New hire mode 2. Add new Employee OE start date : 09/01/2017 End Date : 09/302017 Date of Employment : 09/26/2017 Effective date :09/26/2017 Status : Pass Scenario #3 customization : OE + Qualifying Event OE start date : 09/01/2017 End Date : 09/302017 Date of Employment : 01/012017 raise multiple qualifying events , lesser effective date is not reflecting . Status : FAILED Scenario #4 customization : OE + New hire mode , Set required verification Yes for new hire mode Add new Employee OE start date : 09/01/2017 End Date : 09/302017 Date of Employment : 09/26/2017 Effective date :09/26/2017 data going for approval for new hire mode Status: PASS 3rd scenario is getting failed CC - Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 26/Sep/17 12:57 PM
          • Time Spent:
            7.5h
             

            verified mentioned scenarios

          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 27.25h [ 98100 ] 34.75h [ 125100 ]
          Worklog Id 81640 [ 81640 ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Rutuja Chilwar [ rutuja.chilwar ] Sheetal Bodhale [ sheetal.bodhale ]
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Sheetal Bodhale [ sheetal.bodhale ] Akshay Mukkawar [ akshay.mukkawar ]
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) logged work - 27/Sep/17 12:40 AM
          • Time Spent:
            0.5h
             

            qualifying event scenario discussion with rutuja
            testing on LB

          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212)
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Dev Due Date 25/Sep/2017 09/Oct/2017
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) logged work - 06/Oct/17 08:49 PM
          • Time Spent:
            3h
             
            <No comment>
          Hide
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) added a comment -

          HI Rutuja Chilwar,

          My changes related Mode id not effective date
          I checked customisation : OE + Qualifying Event , system will show lesser effective date and
          I also checked from back end Mode ID is correct .So Please check it once again

          Thanks,
          Akshay Mukkawar
          -----------------------------
          CC:Sheetal Bodhale,Satya

          Show
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) added a comment - HI Rutuja Chilwar , My changes related Mode id not effective date I checked customisation : OE + Qualifying Event , system will show lesser effective date and I also checked from back end Mode ID is correct .So Please check it once again Thanks, Akshay Mukkawar ----------------------------- CC: Sheetal Bodhale , Satya
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Akshay Mukkawar [ akshay.mukkawar ] Rutuja Chilwar [ rutuja.chilwar ]
          akshay.mukkawar Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 34.75h [ 125100 ] 37.75h [ 135900 ]
          Worklog Id 83844 [ 83844 ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
          sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
          Stage Due Date 27/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-27 ] 18/Oct/17 [ 2017-10-18 ]
          sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
          Production Due Date 28/Sep/2017 26/Oct/2017
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment marriage_09022017.png [ 64728 ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment raised _QE.png [ 64729 ]
          Hide
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Hello Swapnil Pandhare
          Verified below mentioned scenario ,earlier it was not working
          Scenario #3
          customisation : OE + Qualifying Event
          Company name : For QA JE Dunn For HSPL
          OE start date :08/31/2017 End Date : 10/18/2017
          Date of Employment : 01/01/2017
          raised qualifying events as below :

          1. Marriage domestic partner registration : 09/012017
          2. Losing coverage in Job loss : 09/02/2017

          When we traverse QE mode for Losing coverage in Job loss : 09/02/2017 Event ,
          09/01/2017 is reflecting as Effective date

          Please find attached screenshots :

          CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande

          Thanks,
          Rutuja

          Show
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hello Swapnil Pandhare Verified below mentioned scenario ,earlier it was not working Scenario #3 customisation : OE + Qualifying Event Company name : For QA JE Dunn For HSPL OE start date :08/31/2017 End Date : 10/18/2017 Date of Employment : 01/01/2017 raised qualifying events as below : 1. Marriage domestic partner registration : 09/012017 2. Losing coverage in Job loss : 09/02/2017 When we traverse QE mode for Losing coverage in Job loss : 09/02/2017 Event , 09/01/2017 is reflecting as Effective date Please find attached screenshots : CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande Thanks, Rutuja
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Rutuja Chilwar [ rutuja.chilwar ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Swapnil Pandhare [ swapnil.pandhare ]
          swapnil.pandhare Swapnil Pandhare (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 17/Oct/17 12:48 PM
          • Time Spent:
            3h
             
            <No comment>
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 37.75h [ 135900 ] 40.75h [ 146700 ]
          Worklog Id 85437 [ 85437 ]
          gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
          Sprint WT Sprint 40 - Bugs [ 94 ]
          gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
          Dev Due Date 09/Oct/2017 03/Nov/2017
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Labels Employee_workflow
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 40.75h [ 146700 ] 41.25h [ 148500 ]
          Worklog Id 88600 [ 88600 ]
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) logged work - 02/Nov/17 01:01 AM
          • Time Spent:
            0.5h
             

            Scenario discussion with Jyotibala

          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) logged work - 02/Nov/17 04:47 AM
          • Time Spent:
            6h
             

            Debugging and Analysis of the issue.
            Tried to reproduced the scenario.
            Debugged the code and analysis of stored procedure.
            Discussion with Sheetal.

          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 41.25h [ 148500 ] 47.25h [ 170100 ]
          Worklog Id 88700 [ 88700 ]
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Swapnil Pandhare [ swapnil.pandhare ] Jyotibala Pardeshi [ jyotibala ]
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Company All Clients/Multiple Clients [ 18434 ]
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Developer Akshay Mukkawar [ akshay.mukkawar ] Jyotibala Pardeshi [ jyotibala ]
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) logged work - 03/Nov/17 04:48 AM
          • Time Spent:
            6.5h
             

            debugging and analysis of the stored procedure.
            discussion with sheetal.

          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 47.25h [ 170100 ] 53.75h [ 193500 ]
          Worklog Id 88905 [ 88905 ]
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 53.75h [ 193500 ] 55.75h [ 200700 ]
          Worklog Id 88984 [ 88984 ]
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Worklog Id 88984 [ 88984 ]
          satyap Satya made changes -
          Bug Type Functional [ 15402 ]
          Root Cause Scenario/Requirement Missed [ 18432 ]
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) logged work - 03/Nov/17 10:13 PM - edited
          • Time Spent:
            2h
             

            Debugging and analysis of the issue.
            Discussion with sheetal.

          satyap Satya made changes -
          Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
          Hide
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Rutuja Chilwar,

          Please find the below comments:

          Scenario 1:
          Customization: QE + QE
          Date of Employment: 11/06/2017

          Raised 2 qualifying events:
          1. Birth or adoption: 10/10/2017
          2. Admin changes: 10/20/2017

          On demographics page, as per system behaviour, we have shown lesser effective date, in this case(10/10/2017)
          If we change any data on demographics, then it will save with lesser effective date with proper qualifying event id in Employee_History table.
          In Employee table it will save data with higher effective date(in this case 10/20/2017)

          Scenario 2:
          Customization: OE + QE
          Date of Employment: 11/07/2017

          OE Dates: 08/31/2017 to 11/06/2017
          OE Effective date: 01/01/2018

          If we change any data on demographics then it will save the data with lesser effective date and
          enrollment id(in this case with QE)

          Note: This is system behavior, we are showing the lesser effective date on the demographics page, if we change any data then data will get save with lesser effective date with enrollment ID in employee_History table, but in Employee table it will save data with higher effective date.

          Thanks and Regards,
          Jyotibala P.

          CC: Satya, Swapnil Pandhare, Sheetal Bodhale

          Show
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Rutuja Chilwar , Please find the below comments: Scenario 1: Customization: QE + QE Date of Employment: 11/06/2017 Raised 2 qualifying events: 1. Birth or adoption: 10/10/2017 2. Admin changes: 10/20/2017 On demographics page, as per system behaviour, we have shown lesser effective date, in this case(10/10/2017) If we change any data on demographics, then it will save with lesser effective date with proper qualifying event id in Employee_History table. In Employee table it will save data with higher effective date(in this case 10/20/2017) Scenario 2: Customization: OE + QE Date of Employment: 11/07/2017 OE Dates: 08/31/2017 to 11/06/2017 OE Effective date: 01/01/2018 If we change any data on demographics then it will save the data with lesser effective date and enrollment id(in this case with QE) Note : This is system behavior, we are showing the lesser effective date on the demographics page, if we change any data then data will get save with lesser effective date with enrollment ID in employee_History table, but in Employee table it will save data with higher effective date. Thanks and Regards, Jyotibala P. CC: Satya , Swapnil Pandhare , Sheetal Bodhale
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Jyotibala Pardeshi [ jyotibala ] Rutuja Chilwar [ rutuja.chilwar ]
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 55.75h [ 200700 ] 59.75h [ 215100 ]
          Worklog Id 89229 [ 89229 ]
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 59.75h [ 215100 ] 60h 5m [ 216300 ]
          Worklog Id 89231 [ 89231 ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
          jyotibala Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive) logged work - 07/Nov/17 06:58 AM
          • Time Spent:
            4h
             

            Debugging and analysis of the data through backed.
            Provided the analysis.
            Updated JIRA comments.
            Discussion with Sheetal.

          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) logged work - 07/Nov/17 07:00 AM - edited
          • Time Spent:
            0.75h
             

            Discussion with Jyotibala
            Comment Review

          Hide
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment -

          Verified below mentioned scenario ,earlier it was not working
          Scenario #3
          customisation : OE + Qualifying Event
          Company name : For QA JE Dunn For HSPL
          OE start date :08/31/2017 End Date : 10/18/2017
          Date of Employment : 01/01/2017
          raised qualifying events (multiple times for back date )as below :

          1. Add Dependent who is loosing coverage : 10/13/17

          2. Add Dependent who is loosing coverage : 10/14/17

          3. Add Dependent who is loosing coverage : 10/15/17

          Reflected effective date : 10/13/17

          Which is working as expected.

          CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande

          Thanks,

          Rutuja

          Show
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - Verified below mentioned scenario ,earlier it was not working Scenario #3 customisation : OE + Qualifying Event Company name : For QA JE Dunn For HSPL OE start date :08/31/2017 End Date : 10/18/2017 Date of Employment : 01/01/2017 raised qualifying events (multiple times for back date )as below : 1. Add Dependent who is loosing coverage : 10/13/17 2. Add Dependent who is loosing coverage : 10/14/17 3. Add Dependent who is loosing coverage : 10/15/17 Reflected effective date : 10/13/17 Which is working as expected. CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande Thanks, Rutuja
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) logged work - 07/Nov/17 12:41 PM
          • Time Spent:
            3h
             
            <No comment>
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 60h 5m [ 216300 ] 63h 5m [ 227100 ]
          Worklog Id 89497 [ 89497 ]
          sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 63h 5m [ 227100 ] 63.5h [ 228600 ]
          Worklog Id 89231 [ 89231 ]
          rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Rutuja Chilwar [ rutuja.chilwar ] Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ]
          gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211)
          sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
          sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Bug Fixed [ 10402 ]
          Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
          sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Akshay Mukkawar (Inactive) made transition -
          Open In Development
          1m 18s 1
          Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made transition -
          In LB Testing Reopen in Local
          7d 20h 14m 2
          Swapnil Pandhare (Inactive) made transition -
          Reopen in Local In Development
          4h 28m 2
          Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) made transition -
          In Development In LB Testing
          39d 4h 22m 3
          Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
          In LB Testing Stage Testing
          136d 23h 1
          Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
          Stage Testing In Production Testing
          15s 1
          Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
          In Production Testing Production Complete
          24s 1
          Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
          Production Complete Closed
          23s 1

            People

            Assignee:
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive)
            Developer:
            Jyotibala Pardeshi (Inactive)
            QA:
            Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Dev Due Date:
              Pre-Prod Due Date:
              Production Due Date:

                Time Tracking

                Estimated:
                Original Estimate - 0h
                0h
                Remaining:
                Remaining Estimate - 0h
                0h
                Logged:
                Time Spent - 63.5h
                63.5h