-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Resolution Setting
-
Priority:
High
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:
-
Environment:Production
-
Bug Type:Functional
-
Bug Severity:Medium
-
Level:Employee
-
Module:BenAdmin - Report
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Company:All Clients/Multiple Clients
-
Item State:Production Complete - Closed
-
Issue Importance:Q2
-
Browser:IE 11
-
Sprint:WT Sprint 38 - Bugs, WT Sprint 39 - Bugs
Env - Production
Company - Deep South
1] Login to the application as a employee.
2] Navigate to "Critical Illness" plan
3] Click on "Enroll" button, employee get redirected to SSO window.
4] Complete the enrollment for Critical Illness plan for Employee Only tier.
5] Observe the Employee Plan Eligibility report in Workterra for that employee.
Actual Result:
Employee cost is different from cost displaying on Confirmation Statement or View Enrollment Summary page.
Expected Result:
Correct Employee cost should display in the report.
Refer attached screenshot for more details.
Cc: Santosh Balid, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Prasad Pise, Samir, Rakesh Roy
- relates to
-
WT-11208 DeepSouth-Selerix Enrollment Integration for CHUBB benefits through SSO
-
- Closed
-
Hi Debbie Kulling,
"Deep South" company has all payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles. Custom Pay Cycles implementation is missing for Reports. With Employee Plan Eligibility Report, this also has an impact on Confirmation Statement Report. Companies that are using Custom Payroll schedule and also extract Confirmation Statement Report will get incorrect cost on the the report.
We will try to schedule this fix in upcoming sprint starting from 9-Oct-2017.
Thank you!
cc: Jaideep Vinchurkar, [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Kunal Kedari, Gaurav Sodani
Please note, same issue exists for "Selerix Integrstion for TrustMark" , as we have done this integration for "Charleys" company on Production. Issue is also reproducible on "Charleys" company on Production:
Refer below screenshot for more details:
Cc: Santosh Balid, Prasanna Karlekar, [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Aditya Vishwakarma, Satya, Samir
Kunal Kedari (Inactive)
added a comment - Please note, same issue exists for "Selerix Integrstion for TrustMark" , as we have done this integration for "Charleys" company on Production. Issue is also reproducible on "Charleys" company on Production:
Refer below screenshot for more details:
Cc: Santosh Balid , Prasanna Karlekar , [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Aditya Vishwakarma , Satya , Samir 3C's:
Concern: Different employee cost is displaying on "Employee Plan Eligibility Report"
Cause: Cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employer Cost) on report was different from cost displaying on Confirmation Statement because Custom Pay Cycles implementation was not implemented for Reports. This company (i.e. "Deep South") has payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles. But, this issue exists to all companies those are using Custom Payroll schedule.
Correction: We have implemented code to handle payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles along with predefined pay cycles. After this changes cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employer Cost) will be same on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report.
Affected Areas: Employee Plan Eligibility Report and Confirmation Statement report
Affected Files: /App/BusinessLogic/Reports/EnrollmentDataReport.vb
Tested Scenarios:
1. Verified Cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employee Cost) on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report.
2. Compared Multiple payroll schedules (i.e. Custom and Predefined Pay Cycles) on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report.
Note: This is not a company specific issue.
Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive)
added a comment - - edited 3C's :
Concern : Different employee cost is displaying on "Employee Plan Eligibility Report"
Cause : Cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employer Cost) on report was different from cost displaying on Confirmation Statement because Custom Pay Cycles implementation was not implemented for Reports. This company (i.e. "Deep South") has payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles. But, this issue exists to all companies those are using Custom Payroll schedule.
Correction : We have implemented code to handle payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles along with predefined pay cycles. After this changes cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employer Cost) will be same on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report.
Affected Areas : Employee Plan Eligibility Report and Confirmation Statement report
Affected Files : /App/BusinessLogic/Reports/EnrollmentDataReport.vb
Tested Scenarios :
1. Verified Cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employee Cost) on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report.
2. Compared Multiple payroll schedules (i.e. Custom and Predefined Pay Cycles) on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report.
Note : This is not a company specific issue.
CC: Prasanna Karlekar Hi,
We have verified the fix on LB (wt-stage) for Texas Life SSO integration. Verified following things:
Verified cost on the "Employee Plan Eligibility" report in below scenarios:
1] Enroll in custom plan with different custom and predifine payroll
2] Enroll in above plan with different tiers
3] Verified the costs on Enroll Now page
4] Verified cost on Confirmation Statement
5] Verified cost on Enrollment Summary page
Cost is displaying as expected in all of the above scenarios. Refer below screenshot for more details. We can deploy fix to Stage.
Cc: [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Prasanna Karlekar, Santosh Balid, Aditya Vishwakarma, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Prasad Pise, Satya
Kunal Kedari (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi,
We have verified the fix on LB (wt-stage) for Texas Life SSO integration. Verified following things:
Verified cost on the "Employee Plan Eligibility" report in below scenarios:
1] Enroll in custom plan with different custom and predifine payroll
2] Enroll in above plan with different tiers
3] Verified the costs on Enroll Now page
4] Verified cost on Confirmation Statement
5] Verified cost on Enrollment Summary page
Cost is displaying as expected in all of the above scenarios. Refer below screenshot for more details. We can deploy fix to Stage.
Cc: [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Prasanna Karlekar , Santosh Balid , Aditya Vishwakarma , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Prasad Pise , Satya
We have verified this fix on Stage for "Symphony For HSPL", it is working as expected. Verified below scenarios:
Verified cost on the "Employee Plan Eligibility" report in below scenarios:
1] Enroll in custom plan with different custom and predifine payroll
2] Enroll in above plan with different tiers
3] Verified the costs on Enroll Now page
4] Verified cost on Confirmation Statement
5] Verified cost on Enrollment Summary page
All the scenarios are working as expected. We can deploy fix to Production.
Cc: Prasanna Karlekar, [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Satya, Prasad Pise
Kunal Kedari (Inactive)
added a comment - We have verified this fix on Stage for "Symphony For HSPL", it is working as expected. Verified below scenarios:
Verified cost on the "Employee Plan Eligibility" report in below scenarios:
1] Enroll in custom plan with different custom and predifine payroll
2] Enroll in above plan with different tiers
3] Verified the costs on Enroll Now page
4] Verified cost on Confirmation Statement
5] Verified cost on Enrollment Summary page
All the scenarios are working as expected. We can deploy fix to Production.
Cc: Prasanna Karlekar , [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Satya , Prasad Pise We have verified the fix on Production on "Deep South For HSPL" , now same employee cost is displaying on "Employee Plan Eligibility" report and on confirmation statement.
Closing the issue.
Cc:Prasanna Karlekar, [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Prasad Pise
Kunal Kedari (Inactive)
added a comment - We have verified the fix on Production on "Deep South For HSPL" , now same employee cost is displaying on "Employee Plan Eligibility" report and on confirmation statement.
Closing the issue.
Cc: Prasanna Karlekar , [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Prasad Pise
I have checked the entries in rate change log. They seems correct. Could please look into this?