Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-11237

Deep South>SSO>Functional>Different employee cost is displaying on "Employee Plan Eligibility Report"

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Resolution Setting
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Level:
      Employee
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Report
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Company:
      All Clients/Multiple Clients
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Q2
    • Browser:
      IE 11
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 38 - Bugs, WT Sprint 39 - Bugs

      Description

      Env - Production
      Company - Deep South

      1] Login to the application as a employee.
      2] Navigate to "Critical Illness" plan
      3] Click on "Enroll" button, employee get redirected to SSO window.
      4] Complete the enrollment for Critical Illness plan for Employee Only tier.
      5] Observe the Employee Plan Eligibility report in Workterra for that employee.

      Actual Result:
      Employee cost is different from cost displaying on Confirmation Statement or View Enrollment Summary page.
      Expected Result:
      Correct Employee cost should display in the report.
      Refer attached screenshot for more details.

      Cc: Santosh Balid, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Prasad Pise, Samir, Rakesh Roy

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) created issue -
            santosh.balid Santosh Balid (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue relates to WT-11208 [ WT-11208 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Aditya Vishwakarma [ aditya.vishwakarma ] Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ]
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            I have checked the entries in rate change log. They seems correct. Could please look into this?

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - I have checked the entries in rate change log. They seems correct. Could please look into this?
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jaideep Vinchurkar [ jaideep.vinchurkar ] Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ] Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: SSO(11500) Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: Report(10109)
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 38 - Bugs [ 89 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 26/Sep/2017
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Estimates 8
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 26/Sep/17 10:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Discussion on issue related to cost appearing on Employee Plan Eligibility report

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 28/Sep/17 04:39 AM
            • Time Spent:
              6.25h
               

              Code changes
              Internal discussion
              Unit testing
              Review request
              JIRA update

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 6.25h [ 22500 ]
            Worklog Id 82048 [ 82048 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 28/Sep/17 10:06 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Internal discussion

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 29/Sep/17 02:15 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Code go through
              Scenario verification from UI - Need to check for Per Pay Period

            Hide
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Debbie Kulling,

            "Deep South" company has all payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles. Custom Pay Cycles implementation is missing for Reports. With Employee Plan Eligibility Report, this also has an impact on Confirmation Statement Report. Companies that are using Custom Payroll schedule and also extract Confirmation Statement Report will get incorrect cost on the the report.

            We will try to schedule this fix in upcoming sprint starting from 9-Oct-2017.

            Thank you!

            cc: Jaideep Vinchurkar, [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Kunal Kedari, Gaurav Sodani

            Show
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , "Deep South" company has all payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles. Custom Pay Cycles implementation is missing for Reports. With Employee Plan Eligibility Report, this also has an impact on Confirmation Statement Report. Companies that are using Custom Payroll schedule and also extract Confirmation Statement Report will get incorrect cost on the the report. We will try to schedule this fix in upcoming sprint starting from 9-Oct-2017. Thank you! cc: Jaideep Vinchurkar , [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Kunal Kedari , Gaurav Sodani
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207)
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 26/Sep/2017 20/Oct/2017
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 6.25h [ 22500 ] 6.75h [ 24300 ]
            Worklog Id 82640 [ 82640 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 6.75h [ 24300 ] 7.25h [ 26100 ]
            Worklog Id 82733 [ 82733 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 7.25h [ 26100 ] 7.75h [ 27900 ]
            Worklog Id 82755 [ 82755 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 7.75h [ 27900 ] 8.75h [ 31500 ]
            Worklog Id 82761 [ 82761 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 29/Sep/17 08:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Discussion on Custom Pay Period
              Implementation verification from code

            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment screenshot-1.png [ 63661 ]
            Hide
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Please note, same issue exists for "Selerix Integrstion for TrustMark" , as we have done this integration for "Charleys" company on Production. Issue is also reproducible on "Charleys" company on Production:

            Refer below screenshot for more details:

            Cc: Santosh Balid, Prasanna Karlekar, [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Aditya Vishwakarma, Satya, Samir

            Show
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) added a comment - Please note, same issue exists for "Selerix Integrstion for TrustMark" , as we have done this integration for "Charleys" company on Production. Issue is also reproducible on "Charleys" company on Production: Refer below screenshot for more details: Cc: Santosh Balid , Prasanna Karlekar , [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Aditya Vishwakarma , Satya , Samir
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 20/Oct/2017 12/Oct/2017
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Estimates 8 25
            Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 38 - Bugs [ 89 ] WT Sprint 38 - Bugs, WT Sprint 39 - Bugs [ 89, 90 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 10/Oct/17 12:30 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Discussion
              Code debug for existing implementation

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 10/Oct/17 05:22 AM
            • Time Spent:
              7h
               

              Issue Analysis
              Code changes
              Unit testing
              Internal discussion

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 8.75h [ 31500 ] 15.75h [ 56700 ]
            Worklog Id 84003 [ 84003 ]
            Hide
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            3C's:

            Concern: Different employee cost is displaying on "Employee Plan Eligibility Report"
            Cause: Cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employer Cost) on report was different from cost displaying on Confirmation Statement because Custom Pay Cycles implementation was not implemented for Reports. This company (i.e. "Deep South") has payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles. But, this issue exists to all companies those are using Custom Payroll schedule.
            Correction: We have implemented code to handle payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles along with predefined pay cycles. After this changes cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employer Cost) will be same on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report.

            Affected Areas: Employee Plan Eligibility Report and Confirmation Statement report

            Affected Files: /App/BusinessLogic/Reports/EnrollmentDataReport.vb

            Tested Scenarios:
            1. Verified Cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employee Cost) on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report.
            2. Compared Multiple payroll schedules (i.e. Custom and Predefined Pay Cycles) on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report.

            Note: This is not a company specific issue.

            CC: Prasanna Karlekar

            Show
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited 3C's : Concern : Different employee cost is displaying on "Employee Plan Eligibility Report" Cause : Cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employer Cost) on report was different from cost displaying on Confirmation Statement because Custom Pay Cycles implementation was not implemented for Reports. This company (i.e. "Deep South") has payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles. But, this issue exists to all companies those are using Custom Payroll schedule. Correction : We have implemented code to handle payroll schedules defined with Custom Pay Cycles along with predefined pay cycles. After this changes cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employer Cost) will be same on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report. Affected Areas : Employee Plan Eligibility Report and Confirmation Statement report Affected Files : /App/BusinessLogic/Reports/EnrollmentDataReport.vb Tested Scenarios : 1. Verified Cost (i.e. Employee cost and Employee Cost) on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report. 2. Compared Multiple payroll schedules (i.e. Custom and Predefined Pay Cycles) on View Enrollment Summary and Employee Plan Eligibility Report. Note : This is not a company specific issue. CC: Prasanna Karlekar
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ] Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 11/Oct/17 04:59 AM
            • Time Spent:
              4.5h
               

              Remaining areas unit testing
              Internal discussion
              JIRA Update
              Review request

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 15.75h [ 56700 ] 20.25h [ 72900 ]
            Worklog Id 84242 [ 84242 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 12/Oct/2017 13/Oct/2017
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ] Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Aditya Vishwakarma [ aditya.vishwakarma ] Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 18/Oct/17 07:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Code review

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 18/Oct/2017
            Code Reviewed By Prasanna Karlekar [ 11907 ]
            Company All Clients/Multiple Clients [ 18434 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ] Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] Kunal Kedari [ kunal.kedari ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 20.25h [ 72900 ] 20.75h [ 74700 ]
            Worklog Id 86902 [ 86902 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) logged work - 27/Oct/17 05:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Testing on Local

            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 20.75h [ 74700 ] 21.75h [ 78300 ]
            Worklog Id 87240 [ 87240 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment AfterFix.jpg [ 66139 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) logged work - 30/Oct/17 05:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Testing of Local

            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Production Due Date 04/Nov/2017
            Stage Due Date 2/Nov/17 [ 2017-11-02 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 21.75h [ 78300 ] 23.25h [ 83700 ]
            Worklog Id 88209 [ 88209 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 23.25h [ 83700 ] 24.75h [ 89100 ]
            Worklog Id 88313 [ 88313 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Hide
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi,

            We have verified the fix on LB (wt-stage) for Texas Life SSO integration. Verified following things:

            Verified cost on the "Employee Plan Eligibility" report in below scenarios:
            1] Enroll in custom plan with different custom and predifine payroll
            2] Enroll in above plan with different tiers
            3] Verified the costs on Enroll Now page
            4] Verified cost on Confirmation Statement
            5] Verified cost on Enrollment Summary page

            Cost is displaying as expected in all of the above scenarios. Refer below screenshot for more details. We can deploy fix to Stage.

            Cc: [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Prasanna Karlekar, Santosh Balid, Aditya Vishwakarma, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Prasad Pise, Satya

            Show
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi, We have verified the fix on LB (wt-stage) for Texas Life SSO integration. Verified following things: Verified cost on the "Employee Plan Eligibility" report in below scenarios: 1] Enroll in custom plan with different custom and predifine payroll 2] Enroll in above plan with different tiers 3] Verified the costs on Enroll Now page 4] Verified cost on Confirmation Statement 5] Verified cost on Enrollment Summary page Cost is displaying as expected in all of the above scenarios. Refer below screenshot for more details. We can deploy fix to Stage. Cc: [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Prasanna Karlekar , Santosh Balid , Aditya Vishwakarma , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Prasad Pise , Satya
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) logged work - 01/Nov/17 05:00 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Testing on Stage

            satyap Satya made changes -
            Labels SSO
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            Hide
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified this fix on Stage for "Symphony For HSPL", it is working as expected. Verified below scenarios:

            Verified cost on the "Employee Plan Eligibility" report in below scenarios:
            1] Enroll in custom plan with different custom and predifine payroll
            2] Enroll in above plan with different tiers
            3] Verified the costs on Enroll Now page
            4] Verified cost on Confirmation Statement
            5] Verified cost on Enrollment Summary page

            All the scenarios are working as expected. We can deploy fix to Production.

            Cc: Prasanna Karlekar, [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Satya, Prasad Pise

            Show
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified this fix on Stage for "Symphony For HSPL", it is working as expected. Verified below scenarios: Verified cost on the "Employee Plan Eligibility" report in below scenarios: 1] Enroll in custom plan with different custom and predifine payroll 2] Enroll in above plan with different tiers 3] Verified the costs on Enroll Now page 4] Verified cost on Confirmation Statement 5] Verified cost on Enrollment Summary page All the scenarios are working as expected. We can deploy fix to Production. Cc: Prasanna Karlekar , [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Satya , Prasad Pise
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 02/Nov/17 12:46 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Code changes merge into stage branch

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 24.75h [ 89100 ] 25.25h [ 90900 ]
            Worklog Id 88841 [ 88841 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Labels SSO Enrollment_Integration
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 04/Nov/17 10:14 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Code checkin in Production branch

            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            Hide
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified the fix on Production on "Deep South For HSPL" , now same employee cost is displaying on "Employee Plan Eligibility" report and on confirmation statement.
            Closing the issue.

            Cc:Prasanna Karlekar, [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Prasad Pise

            Show
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified the fix on Production on "Deep South For HSPL" , now same employee cost is displaying on "Employee Plan Eligibility" report and on confirmation statement. Closing the issue. Cc: Prasanna Karlekar , [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Prasad Pise
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) logged work - 04/Nov/17 05:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Testing on Production

            sudhir.kalikate Sudhir Kalikate (Inactive) logged work - 05/Nov/17 04:02 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               
              1. Discussion with Sheetal.
              2. Code Checked-In on Production.
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 25.25h [ 90900 ] 25.75h [ 92700 ]
            Worklog Id 89446 [ 89446 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 25.75h [ 92700 ] 27.5h [ 99000 ]
            Worklog Id 90336 [ 90336 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ] 0.75h [ 2700 ]
            Time Spent 27.5h [ 99000 ] 26.75h [ 96300 ]
            Worklog Id 90336 [ 90336 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0.75h [ 2700 ] 0.25h [ 900 ]
            Time Spent 26.75h [ 96300 ] 27.25h [ 98100 ]
            Worklog Id 90355 [ 90355 ]
            sudhir.kalikate Sudhir Kalikate (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0.25h [ 900 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 27.25h [ 98100 ] 27.75h [ 99900 ]
            Worklog Id 91028 [ 91028 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) logged work - 16/Nov/17 06:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Fix verification on Azure

            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 27.75h [ 99900 ] 29.25h [ 105300 ]
            Worklog Id 91977 [ 91977 ]
            kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Root Cause Bug [ 18430 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Closed [ 6 ] Resolution Setting [ 11616 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            4d 19h 24m 1
            Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            28d 4h 42m 1
            Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            8d 3h 16m 1
            Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            2d 5m 1
            Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            1h 42m 1
            Kunal Kedari (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            93d 13h 42m 1
            Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
            Closed Resolution Setting
            124d 17h 11m 1

              People

              Assignee:
              kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              kunal.kedari Kunal Kedari (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive)
              QA:
              Kunal Kedari (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 29.25h
                  29.25h