-
Type:
Support Activity
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ACA
-
Labels:None
-
Support Task Type:ACA Data Audit
-
Reported by:White Label
-
Module:ACA
Hi all -
I received more questions from Kaeser. I updated their set up in Production and removed the ACA customization setting where I had called out the EE cost and re-ran the reports. It looks like the minimum cost is not working as expected. Below is how I have it set up. Is there something that should be set up differently. Do I need to go back and set it up with the override? Also the client had more questions regarding the excel report.
Looking at the 3/10 reports: (I made the updates yesterday and I ran new reports for the client.)
The client has two plans in 2015: 2015 PPO Plus, 2015 HDHP
1. $160.33 is the lowest cost option for everyone.
Why is the tobacco surcharge now showing? When the override was on it was picking up the EE cost for this plan at 221, which did not seem right either since the lowest cost is 160.33, but now that I removed the EE Lowest Cost it is looking at the surcharge rates rather than picking up the lowest cost. (FYI – I had entered each EE Lowest Cost for each plan into the blank fields above when I had it set up. If this is turned back on again should I be putting the $160.33 in both plans even though the PPO Plus EE Lowest Cost is 221?).
2. Also, this employee has been full time since he’s been with us, why is this column showing as no (for everyone, not just him)? Is there something we need to update in the site for this?
3. PPO is still visible in the waiting period (though the minimum cost has changed from the 221 to zero): After I removed the Lowest EE Cost the cost for the EE below went away however the report is still picking up the plan name, is that correct?
I realize this is not what the employee sees on the 1095, but this labeling here is confusing. Because it is not possible to be both Part Time and NOT EMPLOYED in the same time frame for the same employer. Perhaps a better label should be used. Feedback from the client regarding the report. Also, Why is the EE showing Part Time? The EE was terminated eff 1/22/2015. The client does not use a part time status. The EE has a terminated status in the site.
Nandkumar Prabhakar KarlekarAbhijeet KhandagaleSachin HingoleDelia SmithPlease check and update the current status of this task.
Hi Lena Kantemirova,Chris Finocchio
Please check the customization for this client.
Need client name please to be able to research further
All this is a UHC client - Elena should not be involved.
The name of the client is in the subject line as well as the initial post to open this ticket - Kaeser. I need to get an answer back to them ASAP on these.
Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Please check.
Rakesh Roy,Sachin Hingole
Sachin can you please check the same and provide the explanation on the same.
Sachin Khandge
Ramy and abhijeet are wotking on the Major Clientd today like SBM,City of Irvine amd Marqutte. so we need Sachin h help for this task. please provide.
1. $160.33 is the lowest cost option for everyone.
[Harbinger] - No need to provide same costs for both the plans if actual costs are different, as per implementation if EE is eligible for both medical plans then application will consider the lowest EE only cost plan for ACA reporting.
2. Also, this employee has been full time since he’s been with us, why is this column showing as no (for everyone, not just him)? Is there something we need to update in the site for this?
[Harbinger] - Yes, This column name is misspelled, Development team will change this column name to "Is Part Time for whole Range". Once changes are deployed on local QA will share production deployment date.
3. PPO is still visible in the waiting period (though the minimum cost has changed from the 221 to zero): After I removed the Lowest EE Cost the cost for the EE below went away however the report is still picking up the plan name, is that correct?
[Harbinger] - Yes this is correct, We are showing plan names having lowest cost for EE tier.
4. I realize this is not what the employee sees on the 1095, but this labeling here is confusing. Because it is not possible to be both Part Time and NOT EMPLOYED in the same time frame for the same employer. Perhaps a better label should be used. Feedback from the client regarding the report. Also, Why is the EE showing Part Time? The EE was terminated eff 1/22/2015. The client does not use a part time status. The EE has a terminated status in the site.
[Harbinger] - This is just for reporting purpose we are showing employee Eligibility status as Part Time, It wont affect anywhere.
And We are showing Employment status in other column that is 'Is Terminated in Month'
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
added a comment - 1. $160.33 is the lowest cost option for everyone.
[Harbinger] - No need to provide same costs for both the plans if actual costs are different, as per implementation if EE is eligible for both medical plans then application will consider the lowest EE only cost plan for ACA reporting.
2. Also, this employee has been full time since he’s been with us, why is this column showing as no (for everyone, not just him)? Is there something we need to update in the site for this?
[Harbinger] - Yes, This column name is misspelled, Development team will change this column name to "Is Part Time for whole Range". Once changes are deployed on local QA will share production deployment date.
3. PPO is still visible in the waiting period (though the minimum cost has changed from the 221 to zero): After I removed the Lowest EE Cost the cost for the EE below went away however the report is still picking up the plan name, is that correct?
[Harbinger] - Yes this is correct, We are showing plan names having lowest cost for EE tier.
4. I realize this is not what the employee sees on the 1095, but this labeling here is confusing. Because it is not possible to be both Part Time and NOT EMPLOYED in the same time frame for the same employer. Perhaps a better label should be used. Feedback from the client regarding the report. Also, Why is the EE showing Part Time? The EE was terminated eff 1/22/2015. The client does not use a part time status. The EE has a terminated status in the site.
[Harbinger] - This is just for reporting purpose we are showing employee Eligibility status as Part Time, It wont affect anywhere.
And We are showing Employment status in other column that is 'Is Terminated in Month'
Nandkumar Prabhakar KarlekarAbhijeet KhandagaleSachin HingoleSmita PawarPlease check and update.