-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Production Complete
-
Priority:
Critical
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: BenAdmin
-
Labels:
-
Environment:Stage
-
Bug Type:Functional
-
Bug Severity:Medium
-
Module:BenAdmin - Enrollment
-
Reported by:Implementation
-
Company:Bio-Rad
-
Stage Company Name:BioRad
-
Item State:Production Complete - Closed
-
Sprint:WT Sprint 41, WT- Sprint 42
In Stage for site BioRad we have a health tier built "Family" this tier is set in the EAP plan design for the Auto Enroll tier. When a new dependent is added in the New Hire window the EAP updates automatially HOWEVER when a dependent is added during a QE the EAP does not update. NH elections don't pend for HR approval and QEs do pend for HR Approval. I thought maybe it was the pending on the QEs but when I tested using the Admin event, which does not pend, the EAP auto enroll didn't add my new dependent automatically.
Please review this bug and provide feedback.
cc;Amit ThorveYamilka CocaRobyn Adkisonpeggy fiedlerGary Cunningham
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
Assignee | Satya [ ID10004 ] | Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] |
Assignee | Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] | Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] |
Assignee | Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] | Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] |
Assignee | Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] |
Assignee | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] | Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ] |
Attachment | current_and_future_enrollment_summary.png [ 68469 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 8h
-
take back up of the company
restore it on local
executing scripts
analysis of issue
creating scenarios to test an issue
share finding with umesh and venkatesh
draft comment and get it reviewed by umesh kadam
Remaining Estimate | 0h [ 0 ] | |
Time Spent | 8h [ 28800 ] | |
Worklog Id | 92371 [ 92371 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) | |
Original Estimate | 0h [ 0 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
Discussion with Shailendra
Assignee | Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ] | Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] |
Time Spent | 8h [ 28800 ] | 8.5h [ 30600 ] |
Worklog Id | 92853 [ 92853 ] |
Worklog Id | 92853 [ 92853 ] |
Attachment | EAP Plan History.png [ 68603 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) |
Assignee | Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] | Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 3.5h
-
analysis, scenario verification and reply to client query
Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | |
Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Rejected [ 10004 ] |
Root Cause | Configuration Error [ 18427 ] |
Assignee | Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] | Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] |
Resolution | Done [ 10000 ] | Unresolved [ 10200 ] |
Status | Rejected [ 10004 ] | Reopen [ 4 ] |
Status | Reopen [ 4 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
Comment |
[ Hi [~amjohnson] Reported EE 'ajQEtest Test' is currently having following enrollment. |Sr.No|Effective Date|Termination Date|Enrollment Tier |1.|7/1/17|11/30/17 |EE |2.|12/1/17|Null|EE+CH1+CH2 You are trying to add third child with Effective Date *11/27/17* which is between *7/1/17* and *11/30/17* (first terminated election EE tier). Hence system is not adding 3rd child . *Note:* If you try to add third child with *Effective date >=12/1/17*, then system is automatically adding child with that date. {color:#14892c}*Note : Please add new employee and child. System is working fine. We have verified same. Please confirm from your end.*{color} Consider following example, - EE had election as 7/1/17 to NULL with EE tier. - Then you add first child with 11/17/17 effective date. He will get following election. |Sr.No|Effective Date|Termination Date|Enrollment Tier |1.|7/1/17|11/16/17|EE |2.|11/17/17|NULL|EE+CH1 - Again if you add second child with 11/27/17 effective date, EE will get following elections: |Sr.No|Effective Date|Termination Date|Enrollment Tier |1.|7/1/17|11/16/17|EE |2.|11/17/17|11/26/17|EE+CH1 |3.|11/27/17|NULL|EE+CH1+CH2 Thanks And Regards Abhilash Warkari CC : [~jyoti.mayne], [~amruta.lohiya], [~umesh.kadam] ] |
Assignee | Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] | Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] |
Time Spent | 8.5h [ 30600 ] | 16.5h [ 59400 ] |
Worklog Id | 93644 [ 93644 ] |
Time Spent | 16.5h [ 59400 ] | 20h [ 72000 ] |
Worklog Id | 93687 [ 93687 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
comment review and scenario discussion
Time Spent | 20h [ 72000 ] | 20.5h [ 73800 ] |
Worklog Id | 93705 [ 93705 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 8h
-
Issue Analysis.
Discussion with jyoti and Shailendra.
Data analysis.
Issue reproduce.
Discussion with jyoti regarding domain knowledge.
Tried scenarios.
Comment on jira.
Assignee | Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] | Abhilash Warkari [ abhilash.warkari ] |
Sprint | WT Sprint 41 - Bugs [ 95 ] |
Assignee | Abhilash Warkari [ abhilash.warkari ] | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
scenario discussion with Amruta and code debug
QA | Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ] | |
QA Estimates | 12 |
Dev Due Date | 15/Dec/2017 | |
Dev Estimates | 28 |
Approval status | Approved for development [ 18453 ] | |
Development Approval | Yes [ 18474 ] |
Stage Due Date | 22/Dec/17 [ 2017-12-22 ] |
Attachment | FW 1211 Sprint - Development Approval.msg [ 69879 ] |
Developer | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] | |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) |
-
- Time Spent:
- 5.5h
-
Discussion with Amruta
Code changes for adding child in core plans with retro/in between effective dates
Unit Testing
Labels | Enrollment_workflow |
-
- Time Spent:
- 6.5h
-
Discussion with Amruta
Code changes for adding child in core plans with retro/in between effective dates
Unit Testing
-
- Time Spent:
- 5h
-
Discussion with Amruta
Code changes for adding child in core plans with retro/in between effective dates
Code changes for adding child in core plans with future effective dates (OK/Cancel popup scenarios for core plan allocation)
Unit Testing
-
- Time Spent:
- 8h
-
Discussion with Amruta
Code changes for adding child in core plans with retro/in between effective dates
Code changes for adding child in core plans with future effective dates (OK/Cancel popup scenarios for core plan allocation)
Unit Testing, Integration testing
Time Spent | 20.5h [ 73800 ] | 21h [ 75600 ] |
Worklog Id | 96457 [ 96457 ] |
Time Spent | 21h [ 75600 ] | 21.25h [ 76500 ] |
Worklog Id | 96471 [ 96471 ] |
Time Spent | 21.25h [ 76500 ] | 21.75h [ 78300 ] |
Worklog Id | 96506 [ 96506 ] |
Time Spent | 21.75h [ 78300 ] | 27.25h [ 98100 ] |
Worklog Id | 96587 [ 96587 ] |
Time Spent | 27.25h [ 98100 ] | 35.25h [ 126900 ] |
Worklog Id | 96589 [ 96589 ] |
Remaining Estimate | 0h [ 0 ] | 1.5h [ 5400 ] |
Time Spent | 35.25h [ 126900 ] | 33.75h [ 121500 ] |
Worklog Id | 96589 [ 96589 ] |
Remaining Estimate | 1.5h [ 5400 ] | 0h [ 0 ] |
Time Spent | 33.75h [ 121500 ] | 38.75h [ 139500 ] |
Worklog Id | 96597 [ 96597 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) |
-
- Time Spent:
- 4h
-
Code review and integration testing with Amruta
Deployment discussion with Gaurav and Amruta
Assignee | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] | Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ] |
Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Local Testing [ 10200 ] |
Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) |
Code Review Date | 18/Dec/2017 | |
Code Reviewed By | Amruta Lohiya [ 11906 ] |
Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) |
Status | Local Testing [ 10200 ] | Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] |
Assignee | Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ] | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] |
Status | Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) |
Assignee | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] | Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ] |
Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Local Testing [ 10200 ] |
Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) |
Attachment | Bio-Rad_scenariosheet.xls [ 70608 ] |
Time Spent | 38.75h [ 139500 ] | 46.75h [ 168300 ] |
Worklog Id | 97396 [ 97396 ] |
Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) |
Attachment | Bio-Rad_scenariosheet.xls [ 70608 ] |
Attachment | Bio-Rad_scenariosheet.xls [ 70664 ] |
Time Spent | 46.75h [ 168300 ] | 50.75h [ 182700 ] |
Worklog Id | 97428 [ 97428 ] |
Time Spent | 50.75h [ 182700 ] | 53.75h [ 193500 ] |
Worklog Id | 97429 [ 97429 ] |
Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) |
Deployment Approval | Approved for stage deployment [ 18455 ] | |
Production Due Date | 29/Dec/2017 |
Status | Local Testing [ 10200 ] | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) |
Time Spent | 53.75h [ 193500 ] | 59.75h [ 215100 ] |
Worklog Id | 97604 [ 97604 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) |
Time Spent | 59.75h [ 215100 ] | 67.75h [ 243900 ] |
Worklog Id | 97806 [ 97806 ] |
Time Spent | 67.75h [ 243900 ] | 70.75h [ 254700 ] |
Worklog Id | 97807 [ 97807 ] |
Time Spent | 70.75h [ 254700 ] | 71.75h [ 258300 ] |
Worklog Id | 97807 [ 97807 ] |
Time Spent | 71.75h [ 258300 ] | 72.5h [ 261000 ] |
Worklog Id | 97876 [ 97876 ] |
Comments |
Hi All, Following point has been approved for production deployment on 12/29 Regards Gaurav |
|
Deployment Approval | Approved for stage deployment [ 18455 ] | Approved for production deployment [ 18457 ] |
Sprint | WT Sprint 41 [ 95 ] | WT Sprint 41, WT- Sprint 42 [ 95, 96 ] |
Stage Due Date | 22/Dec/17 [ 2017-12-22 ] | 19/Jan/18 [ 2018-01-19 ] |
Stage Due Date | 19/Jan/18 [ 2018-01-19 ] | 22/Dec/17 [ 2017-12-22 ] |
Production Due Date | 29/Dec/2017 |
Time Spent | 72.5h [ 261000 ] | 73h [ 262800 ] |
Worklog Id | 101519 [ 101519 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
Follow up for code commit of dependent JIRAs
Discussion with Satya, Jyoti and Shailendra
Production code commit
Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) |
Attachment | FW Production Deployment Request 124.msg [ 72266 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) |
Status | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] | Production Testing [ 10202 ] |
Resolution | Unresolved [ 10200 ] | Fixed [ 1 ] |
Status | Production Testing [ 10202 ] | Production Complete [ 10028 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) | Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223) |
Assignee | Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ] | Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] |
Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times |
---|
|
26m 41s | 1 |
|
5d 8h 44m | 1 |
|
1d 3h 26m | 1 |
|
5s | 1 |
|
3h 54m | 1 |
|
23m 28s | 1 |
|
20d 18h 27m | 2 |
|
2d 2h 26m | 1 |
|
33d 18m | 1 |
|
8m 11s | 1 |
Hi Amannda Johnson,
We have verified your above mentioned concern. Please find our observations as below:-
1] When a new dependent is added in the New Hire window the EAP updates automatically the enrollment with newly added dependent. This is as per expectation
2] When a new dependent is added in the QE window applies only when QE effective date is less than that of New Hire effective date then also the system is working as per expectation.
We have tested this on HSPL copy of Bio-Rad. The system is automatically updating the dependent in both New Hire and also in QA window. Could you provide us more information if still find this as an issue.
Thanks,
Venkatesh