Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-13031

Bio-Rad EAP Family autoenroll

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Production Complete
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Environment:
      Stage
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Implementation
    • Company:
      Bio-Rad
    • Stage Company Name:
      BioRad
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 41, WT- Sprint 42

      Description

      In Stage for site BioRad we have a health tier built "Family" this tier is set in the EAP plan design for the Auto Enroll tier. When a new dependent is added in the New Hire window the EAP updates automatially HOWEVER when a dependent is added during a QE the EAP does not update. NH elections don't pend for HR approval and QEs do pend for HR Approval. I thought maybe it was the pending on the QEs but when I tested using the Admin event, which does not pend, the EAP auto enroll didn't add my new dependent automatically.

      Please review this bug and provide feedback.

      cc;Amit ThorveYamilka CocaRobyn Adkisonpeggy fiedlerGary Cunningham

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            amjohnson Amannda Johnson created issue -
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Amannda Johnson,

            We have verified your above mentioned concern. Please find our observations as below:-

            1] When a new dependent is added in the New Hire window the EAP updates automatically the enrollment with newly added dependent. This is as per expectation
            2] When a new dependent is added in the QE window applies only when QE effective date is less than that of New Hire effective date then also the system is working as per expectation.

            We have tested this on HSPL copy of Bio-Rad. The system is automatically updating the dependent in both New Hire and also in QA window. Could you provide us more information if still find this as an issue.

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amannda Johnson , We have verified your above mentioned concern. Please find our observations as below:- 1] When a new dependent is added in the New Hire window the EAP updates automatically the enrollment with newly added dependent. This is as per expectation 2] When a new dependent is added in the QE window applies only when QE effective date is less than that of New Hire effective date then also the system is working as per expectation. We have tested this on HSPL copy of Bio-Rad. The system is automatically updating the dependent in both New Hire and also in QA window. Could you provide us more information if still find this as an issue. Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ]
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson made changes -
            Assignee Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
            Hide
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment -

            QE will always have the effective AFTER the new hire effective date. The dependent newly added in the QE should then auto enroll in the EAP plan with the new effective date of the QE.

            Show
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment - QE will always have the effective AFTER the new hire effective date. The dependent newly added in the QE should then auto enroll in the EAP plan with the new effective date of the QE.
            samir Samir made changes -
            Assignee Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ]
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) logged work - 23/Nov/17 12:34 PM
            • Time Spent:
              8h
               

              take back up of the company
              restore it on local
              executing scripts
              analysis of issue
              creating scenarios to test an issue
              share finding with umesh and venkatesh
              draft comment and get it reviewed by umesh kadam

            Hide
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Amannda Johnson,

            We have verified above mentioned issue. please find below details:

            1. We have added a Test EE, he get auto enrolled in EAP plan with NH.
            2. Again we have added a Test dependent with QE having the effective date after the new hire effective date.
            3. In this case, dependent get added automatically in EAP plan.

            Can you please provide us list of affected employees? So that we can do more analysis for affected employees.

            Thanks,
            Shailendra Honrao

            Cc:Amruta Lohiya,Jyoti Mayne,Umesh Kadam,Venkatesh Pujari

            Show
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amannda Johnson , We have verified above mentioned issue. please find below details: We have added a Test EE, he get auto enrolled in EAP plan with NH. Again we have added a Test dependent with QE having the effective date after the new hire effective date. In this case, dependent get added automatically in EAP plan. Can you please provide us list of affected employees? So that we can do more analysis for affected employees. Thanks, Shailendra Honrao Cc: Amruta Lohiya , Jyoti Mayne , Umesh Kadam , Venkatesh Pujari
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 8h [ 28800 ]
            Worklog Id 92371 [ 92371 ]
            shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 23/Nov/17 05:30 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Discussion with Shailendra

            Hide
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment -

            Test employee: ajQEtest Test
            This test record was added in stage site BioRad with a date of hire of 07/26/2010. I opened up a QE date of 11/22/2017 added a new child named adminqe test. New child did not automatically get enrolled into EAP plan. Checked confirmation statement today, 11/26/2017, to see if the child got auto enrolled thinking maybe a service ran and got them auto enrolled into the EAP but NO this child is still not showing auto enrolled in the EAP plan.

            Please review this test record and help test the same scenario to help duplicate the concern.

            Show
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment - Test employee: ajQEtest Test This test record was added in stage site BioRad with a date of hire of 07/26/2010. I opened up a QE date of 11/22/2017 added a new child named adminqe test. New child did not automatically get enrolled into EAP plan. Checked confirmation statement today, 11/26/2017, to see if the child got auto enrolled thinking maybe a service ran and got them auto enrolled into the EAP but NO this child is still not showing auto enrolled in the EAP plan. Please review this test record and help test the same scenario to help duplicate the concern.
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Assignee Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 8h [ 28800 ] 8.5h [ 30600 ]
            Worklog Id 92853 [ 92853 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 92853 [ 92853 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Attachment EAP Plan History.png [ 68603 ]
            Hide
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment -

            Hi Amannda Johnson,

            Please find following details.

            Concern: New child did not automatically get enrolled into EAP plan for EE 'ajQEtest Test'

            Cause: For mentioned EE, both child were added on datetime '11/17/2017 1:24:6 PM'. At that time, 'Effective Date Rule for Newly Eligible Core Elections' flag was having value 'First of month following date of change'.

            So when child added with effective date 11/17/2017, system allocated EE+2CH election with effective date 12/1/17 and previous EE tier election terminated with 11/30/2017.

            On '11/22/2017 1:30:47 PM' datetime again, flag value changed to 'No waiting period, Effective on date eligible'. PFA screen shot.

            So now if you add child, it will directly add election in EAP plan with its effective date.

            Please confirm.

            Cc: Amruta Lohiya

            Show
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - Hi Amannda Johnson , Please find following details. Concern: New child did not automatically get enrolled into EAP plan for EE 'ajQEtest Test' Cause: For mentioned EE, both child were added on datetime '11/17/2017 1:24:6 PM'. At that time, 'Effective Date Rule for Newly Eligible Core Elections' flag was having value 'First of month following date of change'. So when child added with effective date 11/17/2017, system allocated EE+2CH election with effective date 12/1/17 and previous EE tier election terminated with 11/30/2017. On '11/22/2017 1:30:47 PM' datetime again, flag value changed to 'No waiting period, Effective on date eligible'. PFA screen shot. So now if you add child, it will directly add election in EAP plan with its effective date. Please confirm. Cc: Amruta Lohiya
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 27/Nov/17 03:26 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3.5h
               

              analysis, scenario verification and reply to client query

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Rejected [ 10004 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Root Cause Configuration Error [ 18427 ]
            Hide
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment -

            Jyoti Mayne I added another child to EE 'ajQEtest Test' and I don't see the new child autoenrolled into the EAP. Please advise.

            Show
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment - Jyoti Mayne I added another child to EE 'ajQEtest Test' and I don't see the new child autoenrolled into the EAP. Please advise.
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson made changes -
            Assignee Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ] Unresolved [ 10200 ]
            Status Rejected [ 10004 ] Reopen [ 4 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Status Reopen [ 4 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            Hide
            abhilash.warkari Abhilash Warkari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Amannda Johnson

            Reported EE 'ajQEtest Test' is currently having following enrollment.

            Sr.No Effective Date Termination Date Enrollment Tier
            1. 7/1/17 11/30/17 EE
            2. 12/1/17 Null EE+CH1+CH2

            You are trying to add third child with Effective Date 11/27/17 which is between 7/1/17 and 11/30/17 (first terminated election EE tier). Hence system is not adding 3rd child .

            Note: If you try to add third child with Effective date >=12/1/17, then system is automatically adding child with that date.

            Note : Please add new employee and child. System is working fine. We have verified same. Please confirm from your end.

            Consider following example,

            • EE had election as 7/1/17 to NULL with EE tier.
            • Then you add first child with 11/17/17 effective date. He will get following election.
              Sr.No Effective Date Termination Date Enrollment Tier
              1. 7/1/17 11/16/17 EE
              2. 11/17/17 NULL EE+CH1
            • Again if you add second child with 11/27/17 effective date, EE will get following elections:
              Sr.No Effective Date Termination Date Enrollment Tier
              1. 7/1/17 11/16/17 EE
              2. 11/17/17 11/26/17 EE+CH1
              3. 11/27/17 NULL EE+CH1+CH2

            Thanks And Regards
            Abhilash Warkari

            CC : Jyoti Mayne, Amruta Lohiya, Umesh Kadam

            Show
            abhilash.warkari Abhilash Warkari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amannda Johnson Reported EE 'ajQEtest Test' is currently having following enrollment. Sr.No Effective Date Termination Date Enrollment Tier 1. 7/1/17 11/30/17 EE 2. 12/1/17 Null EE+CH1+CH2 You are trying to add third child with Effective Date 11/27/17 which is between 7/1/17 and 11/30/17 (first terminated election EE tier). Hence system is not adding 3rd child . Note: If you try to add third child with Effective date >=12/1/17 , then system is automatically adding child with that date. Note : Please add new employee and child. System is working fine. We have verified same. Please confirm from your end. Consider following example, EE had election as 7/1/17 to NULL with EE tier. Then you add first child with 11/17/17 effective date. He will get following election. Sr.No Effective Date Termination Date Enrollment Tier 1. 7/1/17 11/16/17 EE 2. 11/17/17 NULL EE+CH1 Again if you add second child with 11/27/17 effective date, EE will get following elections: Sr.No Effective Date Termination Date Enrollment Tier 1. 7/1/17 11/16/17 EE 2. 11/17/17 11/26/17 EE+CH1 3. 11/27/17 NULL EE+CH1+CH2 Thanks And Regards Abhilash Warkari CC : Jyoti Mayne , Amruta Lohiya , Umesh Kadam
            abhilash.warkari Abhilash Warkari (Inactive) made changes -
            Comment [ Hi [~amjohnson]

            Reported EE 'ajQEtest Test' is currently having following enrollment.

            |Sr.No|Effective Date|Termination Date|Enrollment Tier
            |1.|7/1/17|11/30/17 |EE
            |2.|12/1/17|Null|EE+CH1+CH2

            You are trying to add third child with Effective Date *11/27/17* which is between *7/1/17* and *11/30/17* (first terminated election EE tier). Hence system is not adding 3rd child .

            *Note:* If you try to add third child with *Effective date >=12/1/17*, then system is automatically adding child with that date.

            {color:#14892c}*Note : Please add new employee and child. System is working fine. We have verified same. Please confirm from your end.*{color}

            Consider following example,
            - EE had election as 7/1/17 to NULL with EE tier.
            - Then you add first child with 11/17/17 effective date. He will get following election.
            |Sr.No|Effective Date|Termination Date|Enrollment Tier
            |1.|7/1/17|11/16/17|EE
            |2.|11/17/17|NULL|EE+CH1

            - Again if you add second child with 11/27/17 effective date, EE will get following elections:
            |Sr.No|Effective Date|Termination Date|Enrollment Tier
            |1.|7/1/17|11/16/17|EE
            |2.|11/17/17|11/26/17|EE+CH1
            |3.|11/27/17|NULL|EE+CH1+CH2

            Thanks And Regards
            Abhilash Warkari

            CC : [~jyoti.mayne], [~amruta.lohiya], [~umesh.kadam] ]
            abhilash.warkari Abhilash Warkari (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ]
            abhilash.warkari Abhilash Warkari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 8.5h [ 30600 ] 16.5h [ 59400 ]
            Worklog Id 93644 [ 93644 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 16.5h [ 59400 ] 20h [ 72000 ]
            Worklog Id 93687 [ 93687 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 29/Nov/17 03:44 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              comment review and scenario discussion

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 20h [ 72000 ] 20.5h [ 73800 ]
            Worklog Id 93705 [ 93705 ]
            abhilash.warkari Abhilash Warkari (Inactive) logged work - 29/Nov/17 05:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              8h
               

              Issue Analysis.
              Discussion with jyoti and Shailendra.
              Data analysis.
              Issue reproduce.
              Discussion with jyoti regarding domain knowledge.
              Tried scenarios.
              Comment on jira.

            Hide
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment -

            Abhilash Warkari please confirm the following: if a dependent is added prior to latest effective date for the auto enroll EAP plan the dependent will not get auto enrolled at the time of add and will not get auto enroll by any service run. We are trying to confirm that this is by system design since there could be cases were a dependent might be added prior to the latest effective date. For example if an employee were to open up a QE for Marriage add their spouse on 11/30/2017 then 2 days later open up a child birth QE and adds their newborn that was born on 11/2/2017, by system design, the newborn will not be auto enrolled into the EAP plan, Correct?

            Show
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment - Abhilash Warkari please confirm the following: if a dependent is added prior to latest effective date for the auto enroll EAP plan the dependent will not get auto enrolled at the time of add and will not get auto enroll by any service run. We are trying to confirm that this is by system design since there could be cases were a dependent might be added prior to the latest effective date. For example if an employee were to open up a QE for Marriage add their spouse on 11/30/2017 then 2 days later open up a child birth QE and adds their newborn that was born on 11/2/2017, by system design, the newborn will not be auto enrolled into the EAP plan, Correct?
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson made changes -
            Assignee Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] Abhilash Warkari [ abhilash.warkari ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 01/Dec/17 10:37 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              analysis

            Hide
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment -

            Hi Amannda Johnson,

            Yes, you are right.

            Cc: Satya,Amruta Lohiya,

            Show
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - Hi Amannda Johnson , Yes, you are right. Cc: Satya , Amruta Lohiya ,
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 41 - Bugs [ 95 ]
            amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
            Assignee Abhilash Warkari [ abhilash.warkari ] Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 11/Dec/17 08:41 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              scenario discussion with Amruta and code debug

            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            QA Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ]
            QA Estimates 12
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Dev Due Date 15/Dec/2017
            Dev Estimates 28
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Attaching the development approval email for your reference

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching the development approval email for your reference Regards Gaurav
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Approval status Approved for development [ 18453 ]
            Development Approval Yes [ 18474 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Stage Due Date 22/Dec/17 [ 2017-12-22 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 12/Dec/17 05:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5.5h
               

              Discussion with Amruta
              Code changes for adding child in core plans with retro/in between effective dates
              Unit Testing

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 13/Dec/17 09:14 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               

              discussion

            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Labels Enrollment_workflow
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 13/Dec/17 05:30 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              6.5h
               

              Discussion with Amruta
              Code changes for adding child in core plans with retro/in between effective dates
              Unit Testing

            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 14/Dec/17 05:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Discussion with Amruta
              Code changes for adding child in core plans with retro/in between effective dates
              Code changes for adding child in core plans with future effective dates (OK/Cancel popup scenarios for core plan allocation)
              Unit Testing

            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 15/Dec/17 05:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              8h
               

              Discussion with Amruta
              Code changes for adding child in core plans with retro/in between effective dates
              Code changes for adding child in core plans with future effective dates (OK/Cancel popup scenarios for core plan allocation)
              Unit Testing, Integration testing

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 20.5h [ 73800 ] 21h [ 75600 ]
            Worklog Id 96457 [ 96457 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 21h [ 75600 ] 21.25h [ 76500 ]
            Worklog Id 96471 [ 96471 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 21.25h [ 76500 ] 21.75h [ 78300 ]
            Worklog Id 96506 [ 96506 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 21.75h [ 78300 ] 27.25h [ 98100 ]
            Worklog Id 96587 [ 96587 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 27.25h [ 98100 ] 35.25h [ 126900 ]
            Worklog Id 96589 [ 96589 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ] 1.5h [ 5400 ]
            Time Spent 35.25h [ 126900 ] 33.75h [ 121500 ]
            Worklog Id 96589 [ 96589 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 1.5h [ 5400 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 33.75h [ 121500 ] 38.75h [ 139500 ]
            Worklog Id 96597 [ 96597 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 18/Dec/17 05:30 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Code review and integration testing with Amruta
              Deployment discussion with Gaurav and Amruta

            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Hide
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Rashmita Dudhe,

            To resolve this bug, we have made code changes in core routines of Enrollment. Please find below the impacted areas

            • Core plan allocation
            • Enroll Now
            • Terminate employee election screens
            • Pending Queue (accept/reject scenarios)
            • Pending EOI (accept/reject scenarios)
            • Effective/Termination date rule(s)
            • Workflows of all Modes (i.e. OE, QE, New-Hire, Re-Hire)

            All the above impacted areas need to test using following screens with retro, current and future date scenarios

            • Enroll now
            • Employee data (like - Demographics, Dependent Demographics)
            • Terminate employee elections
            • Import module
            • SA utility

            Please note : Performance must to be observed using Import and SA utility as there is change in Bulk Operation Routines.

            Thanks and Regards,
            :: Umesh Kadam

            CC : Samir, Satya, Gaurav Sodani, Rakesh Roy, Amruta Lohiya, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Jyoti Mayne, Prasad Pise, Hrishikesh Deshpande

            Show
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Rashmita Dudhe , To resolve this bug, we have made code changes in core routines of Enrollment. Please find below the impacted areas Core plan allocation Enroll Now Terminate employee election screens Pending Queue (accept/reject scenarios) Pending EOI (accept/reject scenarios) Effective/Termination date rule(s) Workflows of all Modes (i.e. OE, QE, New-Hire, Re-Hire) All the above impacted areas need to test using following screens with retro, current and future date scenarios Enroll now Employee data (like - Demographics, Dependent Demographics) Terminate employee elections Import module SA utility Please note : Performance must to be observed using Import and SA utility as there is change in Bulk Operation Routines. Thanks and Regards, :: Umesh Kadam CC : Samir , Satya , Gaurav Sodani , Rakesh Roy , Amruta Lohiya , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Jyoti Mayne , Prasad Pise , Hrishikesh Deshpande
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is cloned by WT-12817 [ WT-12817 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 18/Dec/2017
            Code Reviewed By Amruta Lohiya [ 11906 ]
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Umesh Kadam,

            CC:Hrishikesh Deshpande,Amruta Lohiya,Jaideep Vinchurkar,Jyoti Mayne,Gaurav Sodani,Prasad Pise,Samir

            Verified this on Lb Environment.

            1]Core plan allocation not working through UI — Current, retro, and future date
            2]Core plan allocation not working through Import Also — Current, retro, and future date
            tried on more than 4 companies.

            For other scenarios testing in progress..

            Thanks,
            Rashmita

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Umesh Kadam , CC: Hrishikesh Deshpande , Amruta Lohiya , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Jyoti Mayne , Gaurav Sodani , Prasad Pise , Samir Verified this on Lb Environment. 1]Core plan allocation not working through UI — Current, retro, and future date 2]Core plan allocation not working through Import Also — Current, retro, and future date tried on more than 4 companies. For other scenarios testing in progress.. Thanks, Rashmita
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Reopen in Local [ 10018 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ] Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 20/Dec/17 05:46 AM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Lb testing

            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            Hide
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Rashmita Dudhe,

            Please find below 3C's :

            Concern Core plan allocation not working
            Cause It was deployment issue. While committing code in LB branch, I missed cope plan auto enrollment condition for newly added employees.
            Correction I have committed correct code in LB branch. It has been re-deployed to LB in today (12/20/2017). I have also done smoke test and it is working fine. Please check and confirm

            Thanks and Regards
            :: Umesh Kadam

            CC : Gaurav Sodani, Amruta Lohiya, Hrishikesh Deshpande, Prasad Pise

            Show
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Rashmita Dudhe , Please find below 3C's : Concern Core plan allocation not working Cause It was deployment issue. While committing code in LB branch, I missed cope plan auto enrollment condition for newly added employees. Correction I have committed correct code in LB branch. It has been re-deployed to LB in today (12/20/2017). I have also done smoke test and it is working fine. Please check and confirm Thanks and Regards :: Umesh Kadam CC : Gaurav Sodani , Amruta Lohiya , Hrishikesh Deshpande , Prasad Pise
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hi Umesh Kadam[~jaideep.vinchurkar]

            CC:Hrishikesh Deshpande,Rakesh Roy,Gaurav Sodani,Jyoti Mayne

            LB environment For OA MATT

            #Scenario 1 Core plan allocation

            1]Add Employee through UI – with Retro, Current and future date
            2]Insert employee through Import – with Retro, Current and future date
            3]Core plan allocation through SA utility more than 3000 employee
            4]ineligible core plan by changing class through UI with retro, current and future date

            5]Try to ineligible core plan through Import by changing class but it is not working: Failed.
            through synchronous mod import getting failed. through asynchronous mode file imported successfully
            But change in plan not happened

            refer below error log:

            ErrorID : 0
            ErrorSource : ControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->WORKTERRAControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData_Isolated->WTIsolatedRoutines.Main->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData->CopyFileFromServer.CopyFileFromServer
            ErrorMessage: Could not find file '\\10.0.2.125\Temp\Encrypt_umesh_class_change12_20_2017 05_27_56 PM.txt'.

            Continue testing for other scenarios.

            Thanks,
            Rashmita

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Umesh Kadam [~jaideep.vinchurkar] CC: Hrishikesh Deshpande , Rakesh Roy , Gaurav Sodani , Jyoti Mayne LB environment For OA MATT #Scenario 1 Core plan allocation 1]Add Employee through UI – with Retro, Current and future date 2]Insert employee through Import – with Retro, Current and future date 3]Core plan allocation through SA utility more than 3000 employee 4]ineligible core plan by changing class through UI with retro, current and future date 5] Try to ineligible core plan through Import by changing class but it is not working: Failed. through synchronous mod import getting failed. through asynchronous mode file imported successfully But change in plan not happened refer below error log: ErrorID : 0 ErrorSource : ControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->WORKTERRAControllerAppTier.SaveAndGetData->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData_Isolated->WTIsolatedRoutines.Main->ExecuteImportDTS.ImportData->CopyFileFromServer.CopyFileFromServer ErrorMessage: Could not find file '\\10.0.2.125\Temp\Encrypt_umesh_class_change12_20_2017 05_27_56 PM.txt'. Continue testing for other scenarios. Thanks, Rashmita
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 21/Dec/17 05:44 AM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               
              <No comment>
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified all attached scenarios on LB environment.
            working fine as expected.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Verified all attached scenarios on LB environment. working fine as expected.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 21/Dec/17 01:18 PM
            • Time Spent:
              8h
               

              Lb testing

            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Bio-Rad_scenariosheet.xls [ 70608 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 38.75h [ 139500 ] 46.75h [ 168300 ]
            Worklog Id 97396 [ 97396 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Bio-Rad_scenariosheet.xls [ 70608 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Bio-Rad_scenariosheet.xls [ 70664 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 46.75h [ 168300 ] 50.75h [ 182700 ]
            Worklog Id 97428 [ 97428 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 50.75h [ 182700 ] 53.75h [ 193500 ]
            Worklog Id 97429 [ 97429 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            This ticket has been approved for stage deployment on 12/21/17.

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, This ticket has been approved for stage deployment on 12/21/17. Regards Gaurav
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Deployment Approval Approved for stage deployment [ 18455 ]
            Production Due Date 29/Dec/2017
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 22/Dec/17 12:44 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               

              Stage Testing

            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified all attached scenarios on Stage environment.
            working fine as expected.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Verified all attached scenarios on Stage environment. working fine as expected.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 53.75h [ 193500 ] 59.75h [ 215100 ]
            Worklog Id 97604 [ 97604 ]
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Amannda Johnson,

            This is deployed and verified in a Stage environment.
            You can check now.

            Thanks,
            Rashmita

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amannda Johnson , This is deployed and verified in a Stage environment. You can check now. Thanks, Rashmita
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 22/Dec/17 05:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.75h
               

              Stage code commit

            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 59.75h [ 215100 ] 67.75h [ 243900 ]
            Worklog Id 97806 [ 97806 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 67.75h [ 243900 ] 70.75h [ 254700 ]
            Worklog Id 97807 [ 97807 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 70.75h [ 254700 ] 71.75h [ 258300 ]
            Worklog Id 97807 [ 97807 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 71.75h [ 258300 ] 72.5h [ 261000 ]
            Worklog Id 97876 [ 97876 ]
            Hide
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment -

            Rashmita Dudhe I have tested this on stage and the client has as well. All is working as expected YAY! Thank you! Let me know if there is anything else that is needed to help move this to production.

            Show
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment - Rashmita Dudhe I have tested this on stage and the client has as well. All is working as expected YAY! Thank you! Let me know if there is anything else that is needed to help move this to production.
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Comments Hi All,

            Following point has been approved for production deployment on 12/29

            Regards
            Gaurav
            Deployment Approval Approved for stage deployment [ 18455 ] Approved for production deployment [ 18457 ]
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Amannda Johnson

            As part of the production deployment review of WT-12291 scheduled on 12/29/17, we found that a specific code block (employee enrollment HASH) was not deployed on production as it was part of WT-11746 and WT-11744, As we do not have approval for production deployment of WT-11746 and WT-11744 we were not able to deploy WT-12291 on production as the code would break and throw server error.
            We would need to deploy WT-11746 and WT-11744 to production in order for this issue to be resolved

            Regards
            Gaurav

            CC: Nagini IndugulaJennifer ReedSatyaUmesh KadamJyoti MayneAmruta Lohiya

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amannda Johnson As part of the production deployment review of WT-12291 scheduled on 12/29/17, we found that a specific code block (employee enrollment HASH) was not deployed on production as it was part of WT-11746 and WT-11744 , As we do not have approval for production deployment of WT-11746 and WT-11744 we were not able to deploy WT-12291 on production as the code would break and throw server error. We would need to deploy WT-11746 and WT-11744 to production in order for this issue to be resolved Regards Gaurav CC: Nagini Indugula Jennifer Reed Satya Umesh Kadam Jyoti Mayne Amruta Lohiya
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference Regards Gaurav
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 41 [ 95 ] WT Sprint 41, WT- Sprint 42 [ 95, 96 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Component/s UI Refresh [ 10902 ]
            Component/s BenAdmin [ 10000 ]
            Key WT-12291 NF-5689
            Project WORKTERRA [ 10000 ] New Features 2017 [ 11000 ]
            Hide
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

            As discussed with Gaurav Sodani and Jaideep Vinchurkar moved this ticket from WT to NF project

            Show
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - As discussed with Gaurav Sodani and Jaideep Vinchurkar moved this ticket from WT to NF project
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Component/s BenAdmin [ 10000 ]
            Component/s UI Refresh [ 10902 ]
            Key NF-5689 WT-13031
            Project New Features 2017 [ 11000 ] WORKTERRA [ 10000 ]
            Hide
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

            As discussed in Stand-up meeting, covert back this ticket from NF to WT.

            Show
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - As discussed in Stand-up meeting, covert back this ticket from NF to WT.
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Stage Due Date 22/Dec/17 [ 2017-12-22 ] 19/Jan/18 [ 2018-01-19 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Stage Due Date 19/Jan/18 [ 2018-01-19 ] 22/Dec/17 [ 2017-12-22 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Production Due Date 29/Dec/2017
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 72.5h [ 261000 ] 73h [ 262800 ]
            Worklog Id 101519 [ 101519 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 23/Jan/18 05:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Follow up for code commit of dependent JIRAs
              Discussion with Satya, Jyoti and Shailendra
              Production code commit

            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference Regards Gaurav
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified all attached scenarios on the Production environment.
            working fine as expected.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Verified all attached scenarios on the Production environment. working fine as expected.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ] Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            This is deployed and verified on Production.
            Kindly, Update Jira accordingly.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - This is deployed and verified on Production. Kindly, Update Jira accordingly.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ] Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ]
            rohan.khandave Rohan J Khandave (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue causes WT-13207 [ WT-13207 ]
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue causes WT-13373 [ WT-13373 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            26m 41s 1
            Jyoti Mayne made transition -
            In Development Rejected
            5d 8h 44m 1
            Satya made transition -
            Rejected Reopen
            1d 3h 26m 1
            Satya made transition -
            Reopen In Development
            5s 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Reopen in Local
            3h 54m 1
            Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made transition -
            Reopen in Local In Development
            23m 28s 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            20d 18h 27m 2
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            2d 2h 26m 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            33d 18m 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            8m 11s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              amjohnson Amannda Johnson
              Reporter:
              amjohnson Amannda Johnson
              Developer:
              Umesh Kadam (Inactive)
              QA:
              Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 73h
                  73h