Hi Kira Hamilton,
Following are the updates for above reply from BCC:
#1. "The only group's invoice that can be deleted by development is City of Walnut Creek's January invoice."
-There are only 4 elections that were impacted for this company. We will trigger the adjustments from backend so that they appear in Feb 2018 invoice. No need to regenerate Jan 2018 invoice for City of Walnut Creek as well.
#2. "Other than this group, please inform Development that they absolutely CANNOT DELETE our generated Invoices. This is NOT an option."
-Please be informed that, we never delete any invoice (finalized / non finalized) on main company. We always do the verification on HSPL copy. If any time it does happens, then it is only by mistake and not intentionally. Hence, we will not be deleting / regenerating any of the client's invoices.
#3. "They must make the appropriate adjustments and have those adjustments appear on the client’s next Invoice."
-Yes. This will be done. You can expect the data that will trigger adjustments on Feb 2018 invoice, to be inserted in system by following date:
Company Name |
Can Expect By |
City of SeaTac |
16-Jan-2017 |
City of Walnut Creek |
16-Jan-2017 |
COSB |
17-Jan-2017 |
We need more time for COSB, as there are around 61 adjustments that needs to triggered. We need time to insert this data and verify it once at our end.
#4. I would also like an explanation as to how or why this occurred?
-This issue was there only for Health plans when a rate has more than 1 self insured component mapped. We have already mentioned in our first comment itself that, this issue is caused because of fix that we did in WT-10187. We had verified WT-10187 for Health - Billed Rate, Health - Single Self Insured Component and Non Health plan - Single Rate, Non Health plan - Multiple rates mapped. We did not verify the scenario for multiple self insured components. And this issue got reported for multiple self Insured components where only single component cost was appearing on invoice and rest of the components cost was getting excluded.
#5. Also, what has been put into place to ensure that this does not happen again in the future.
-While doing any core logic changes, in our verification check list with Health Plan - Billed Rates, Health Plan - Single Self Insured Component, Non Health Plan - Single Rate, Non Health Plan - Multiple Rates, we will also include multiple self insured component scenario.
Please note that we are not converting this JIRA to bug as we had explored this issue at our end while fixing WT-13053. Hence, the fix will be deployed on all companies with WT-13053 only.
Also, we do apologies for the incorrect Jan 2018 invoices that got generated at client end.
Do let us know, if any more details required.
Thank you!
cc: Jyoti Agrawal
Hi Prasanna Karlekar & Amruta Lohiya,
Please coordinate together to resolve this issue
Regards
Gaurav
Umesh KadamSatyaHrishikesh Deshpande