Details

    • Type: Support Activity
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Support Task Type:
      ACA Data Audit
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Module:
      BenAdmin

      Description

      Please let me know on the below. Thanks!

      I tried the update you recommended in making all plans MV in
      the ACA customization tab.  I tested this with RCPS in production.  I
      ran another set of forms, finalized them and exported the excel report and I
      noticed the 1F code was no longer showing. However, in Jackie’s UVU build, she
      does not have any plans selected as MV in the ACA Customization tab and I ran
      an excel report using the finalized reports in UVU and found no records with
      the 1F value.  I am curious why is there a difference?

       

       

        Attachments

          Activity

          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers created issue -
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Component/s ACA [ 10004 ]
          Hide
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -
          Show
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Please see.
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Nandkumar [ satyap ]
          Hide
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

          Jennifer Leugers

          This is from Stage site right?

          Show
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Jennifer Leugers This is from Stage site right?
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Nandkumar [ satyap ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ]
          Hide
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -


          Can you please look into this. try this on production

          Show
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Can you please look into this. try this on production
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

          In UVU, all plans were minimum values as EE contribution is less than 40% share of total benefits of the company.
          So 1F code did not populate in UVU build. Last run of UVU was on 22nd March 2016.Finalized run is of 21st March 2016.

          However, we have made changes related to minimum value on 24th March 2016.
          Related to email "Re: Change in ACA Minimum value Implementation"
          Email content is as follows :
          Current Implementation:
          Minimum value is true If this is set on the Customization or if the total cost of benefit across company is divided as EE 40% and ER 60% share,

          New implementation.
          Consider the ACA customization flag completely. If it is marked then plan is MV if not marked then Plan is not MV.

          We have deployed this change on all companies.
          So if 1095C report is re-run now,they will get 1F code instead of 1A/1E

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar In UVU, all plans were minimum values as EE contribution is less than 40% share of total benefits of the company. So 1F code did not populate in UVU build. Last run of UVU was on 22nd March 2016.Finalized run is of 21st March 2016. However, we have made changes related to minimum value on 24th March 2016. Related to email "Re: Change in ACA Minimum value Implementation" Email content is as follows : Current Implementation: Minimum value is true If this is set on the Customization or if the total cost of benefit across company is divided as EE 40% and ER 60% share, New implementation. Consider the ACA customization flag completely. If it is marked then plan is MV if not marked then Plan is not MV. We have deployed this change on all companies. So if 1095C report is re-run now,they will get 1F code instead of 1A/1E
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Nandkumar [ satyap ]
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Nandkumar [ satyap ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
          Hide
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Lena Kantemirova and Jennifer Leugers

          Please close the ticket if completed.

          Show
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Lena Kantemirova and Jennifer Leugers Please close the ticket if completed.
          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
          Status Waiting for Customer Input [ 10500 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
          Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
          Status In Progress [ 3 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
          satyap Satya made changes -
          Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
          Open Waiting for Customer Input
          8h 45m 1
          Jennifer Leugers made transition -
          Waiting for Customer Input In Progress
          55d 11h 58m 1
          Jennifer Leugers made transition -
          In Progress Resolved
          5s 1

            People

            Assignee:
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers
            Reporter:
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: