-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ACA
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:QA
-
Module:ACA
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Item State:Production Complete
Steps
1] 1094/5 C forms are created and finalized (1 Submission with 3 Records)
2] UI Submission is created
3] its original transmission is completed and its accepted by IRS
4] User done correction in 1095 C form (Out of 3 only 1 record is corrected), Run 1095 and 1094C and finalized it created Corrected UI submission
5] Also its submitted to IRS and its accepted by IRS
6] Now 2nd time User done correction to 1095 C (Different 1095C record than corrected in step 4)
7] Go to UI Submission report page
8] edit respective UI Submission record and click on Verify Submission data
Actual result - it gives server error pop up, refer attached error log 04_28_2016_14_53_24_746_3698_639.txt
- relates to
-
WT-1771 Correction and replacement XML Creation [correction]
-
- Closed
-
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
created issue -
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made changes -
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made changes -
| Attachment | 1094_C_Raw_BB2D9_20160428T145324610Z.xml [ 16473 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200) | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) |
| Assignee | Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ] | Nandkumar [ satyap ] |
Plan this task with you or kumar this is the regular scenario. we need this with the same release.
| Assignee | Nandkumar [ satyap ] | Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) |
Kumar Chhajed Ramya Tantry Abhijeet Khandagale Yogesh Chaudhari Sachin Hingole Sachin Khandge Rakesh Roy
Hi Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar ,
I have completed this task but due to not completed WT-2240 task. I am not able to push to LB environment.
FYI.
Thanks & Regards,
Revan
| Assignee | Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ] | Nandkumar [ satyap ] |
| Assignee | Nandkumar [ satyap ] | Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ] |
| Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
| Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Local Testing [ 10200 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) |
| Assignee | Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ] | Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] |
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
made changes -
| Assignee | Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] | Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] |
We have verified above mentioned issue on LB company. [City of Redding for Hspl].
As per new implementation, there is no separate functionality for IRS correction and User Correction.
Its working fine.
Tested scenarios are as follows.
1.Correction done for single employee submitted to IRS site received Accepted status.
2.Correction done for other employee then submitted to IRS site received Accepted status.
3.Done user correction for 1094-C, 1095-C and submitted to IRS site received Accepted
status.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on LB company. [City of Redding for Hspl] .
As per new implementation, there is no separate functionality for IRS correction and User Correction.
Its working fine.
Tested scenarios are as follows.
1.Correction done for single employee submitted to IRS site received Accepted status.
2.Correction done for other employee then submitted to IRS site received Accepted status.
3.Done user correction for 1094-C, 1095-C and submitted to IRS site received Accepted
status. Smita Pawar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) |
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) |
| Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) | Parent values: Production QA(10203) |
| Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203) | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) |
As per new implementation, there is no separate functionality for IRS correction
and User Correction.
Its working fine.
We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company [ACA Demo company].
Tested scenarios are as follows.
1.Correction done for single employee using Correction as Transmission Type.
2.Done user corrections for 1094-C, 1095-C using Correction as Transmission Type.
Received no server error in above mentioned scenarios.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - As per new implementation, there is no separate functionality for IRS correction
and User Correction.
Its working fine.
We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company [ACA Demo company] .
Tested scenarios are as follows.
1.Correction done for single employee using Correction as Transmission Type.
2.Done user corrections for 1094-C, 1095-C using Correction as Transmission Type.
Received no server error in above mentioned scenarios. Smita Pawar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Status | Local Testing [ 10200 ] | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) |
| Status | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] | Production Testing [ 10202 ] |
Due to Production support task WT-881, we could not complete testing of this JIra as per plan.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Due to Production support task WT-881 , we could not complete testing of this JIra as per plan. Efforts = 1 hr and will get completed by 24th Jun.
We have verified above mentioned issue on Production company [County of Del Norte for HSpl].
Considered two employees from accepted submission.
First time done corrections in only single employees's 1095C and rerun the reports after correction. Submitted to IRS. Next time done corrections in different 1095-C report. Rerun the reports and after verifying the data . Submitted to IRS site.
No error received. Its working fine hence closing ticket.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on Production company [County of Del Norte for HSpl] .
Considered two employees from accepted submission.
First time done corrections in only single employees's 1095C and rerun the reports after correction. Submitted to IRS. Next time done corrections in different 1095-C report. Rerun the reports and after verifying the data . Submitted to IRS site.
No error received. Its working fine hence closing ticket. Smita Pawar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Issue Category | EBS [ 10350 ] | Harbinger [ 10700 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) | Parent values: Production Complete(10222) |
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] | |
| Status | Production Testing [ 10202 ] | Production Complete [ 10028 ] |
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Status | Production Complete [ 10028 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
| Environment_New | LB [ 18444 ] |
| Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times |
|---|
|
21d 22h 7m | 1 |
|
15s | 1 |
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
14d 1h 33m | 1 |
|
7d 3h 34m | 1 |
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
16d 19h 52m | 1 |
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
15s | 1 |
Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Sachin HingoleRakesh RoySachin KhandgeKumar Chhajed Ramya TantryAbhijeet KhandagaleYogesh Chaudhari
As discussed with Nandkumar this type of senario functionality will be implemented in 2nd stage.