Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Must have Additional

      Description

      Hi Ramya Tantry

      Lets discuss the attached analysis for user corrections of 1095 C. We we develop this ASAP then any one can do the correction because if we create the excel properly then we can do this for any number of employee and no need to create the Company specific sp for correction purpose only.

      There are below client needed
      lake county.
      USE
      OCSD
      Del norte
      Town of carry.
      .......
      ....

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
            I am still working on some scenarios. Meanwhile I have some Queries-
            1. If line 16 contains 2C,then mark only employee box of that month.
            — As per the code implemented now,if line 16=2C,all dependants boxes will be checked.
            As per discussion,it was decided that only employee box should be checked. But if we can check all boxes,should I change the implementation to check only employee box.

            2. if line16=2C, how we will know that plan is self insured and we need to show it.
            This scenario will be like,employee's original 1095C do not have Part 3 filled as he is not enrolled in self insured plan. So do we need to fill up part 3 because,given Line 16 =2C

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar I am still working on some scenarios. Meanwhile I have some Queries- 1. If line 16 contains 2C,then mark only employee box of that month. — As per the code implemented now,if line 16=2C,all dependants boxes will be checked. As per discussion,it was decided that only employee box should be checked. But if we can check all boxes,should I change the implementation to check only employee box. 2. if line16=2C, how we will know that plan is self insured and we need to show it. This scenario will be like,employee's original 1095C do not have Part 3 filled as he is not enrolled in self insured plan. So do we need to fill up part 3 because,given Line 16 =2C
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

            One more query.
            Should we consider changing plan start month,if we are changing codes,covered individual?

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar One more query. Should we consider changing plan start month,if we are changing codes,covered individual?
            Hide
            jphi Jennifer Melgoza added a comment -

            Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar and Ramya TantryWe have fixed the box with rates showing per your question on May 6 -

            Ramya Tantry as for the 7 people you sent - the client is going to send a spreadsheet to add these folks, they were missed in the history data load. we will need to add the employee and add the benefit load.

            Please stand by on that.

            Show
            jphi Jennifer Melgoza added a comment - Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar and Ramya Tantry We have fixed the box with rates showing per your question on May 6 - Ramya Tantry as for the 7 people you sent - the client is going to send a spreadsheet to add these folks, they were missed in the history data load. we will need to add the employee and add the benefit load. Please stand by on that.
            Hide
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            High level estimation is 22 days.

            Show
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - High level estimation is 22 days.
            Hide
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi shyam sharma,

            This enhancement is completed and deployed on LB . So the USer can correct the 1095 c forms from UI only.
            The second sub part of this enhancement is Correction import which require the 12 days are not schedule yet because some analysis and format finalization is needed.

            Sachin Hingole

            Show
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi shyam sharma , This enhancement is completed and deployed on LB . So the USer can correct the 1095 c forms from UI only. The second sub part of this enhancement is Correction import which require the 12 days are not schedule yet because some analysis and format finalization is needed. Sachin Hingole
            Hide
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Nandu

            If you are saying this is already deployed on LB then why this is still
            showing status as In Development

            Ideally this should show Local testing, so can you please update status in
            JIRA ?

            –

            Regards,

            Shyam

            From: Nandkumar (JIRA) jira@workterra.atlassian.net
            Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 2:26 PM
            To: shyam.sharma@harbingergroup.com
            Subject: [JIRA] Nandkumar mentioned you on WT-2295 (JIRA)

            <https://workterra.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=nandkumar>
            Nandkumar mentioned you on <https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-2295>
            EnhancementWT-2295

            <https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-2295> Re: 1095 c User correction

            Hi
            <https://workterra.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=shyam.sharma>
            Shyam Sharma,

            This enhancement is completed and deployed on LB . So the USer can correct
            the 1095 c forms from UI only.
            The second sub part of this enhancement is Correction import which require
            the 12 days are not schedule yet because some analysis and format
            finalization is needed.

            <https://workterra.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=sachin.hingole>Sachin Hingole <https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-2295#add-comment> Add Comment <https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-2295#add-comment> Add CommentThis message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.140.0#100004-sha1:6c5f7c6)Atlassian logo

            Show
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Nandu If you are saying this is already deployed on LB then why this is still showing status as In Development Ideally this should show Local testing, so can you please update status in JIRA ? – Regards, Shyam From: Nandkumar (JIRA) jira@workterra.atlassian.net Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 2:26 PM To: shyam.sharma@harbingergroup.com Subject: [JIRA] Nandkumar mentioned you on WT-2295 (JIRA) < https://workterra.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=nandkumar > Nandkumar mentioned you on < https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-2295 > EnhancementWT-2295 < https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-2295 > Re: 1095 c User correction Hi < https://workterra.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=shyam.sharma > Shyam Sharma, This enhancement is completed and deployed on LB . So the USer can correct the 1095 c forms from UI only. The second sub part of this enhancement is Correction import which require the 12 days are not schedule yet because some analysis and format finalization is needed. < https://workterra.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=sachin.hingole >Sachin Hingole < https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-2295#add-comment > Add Comment < https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-2295#add-comment > Add CommentThis message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v1000.140.0#100004-sha1:6c5f7c6)Atlassian logo
            Hide
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hi Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,

            FYI,

            This enhancement has not been deployed on LB. As per discussion with you one more point ( of Generic Eligibility Rule) is remaining. Will deploy this in next week.

            shyam sharma

            Show
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , FYI, This enhancement has not been deployed on LB. As per discussion with you one more point ( of Generic Eligibility Rule) is remaining. Will deploy this in next week. shyam sharma
            Hide
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) added a comment -

            Kumar Chhajed : what is the status now for this task ? on 7th July you informed us that this will be deployed in next week ? is this deployed on LB ? if not let me know where we stuck ?
            Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

            Show
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) added a comment - Kumar Chhajed : what is the status now for this task ? on 7th July you informed us that this will be deployed in next week ? is this deployed on LB ? if not let me know where we stuck ? Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
            Hide
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment -

            shyam sharma

            As we were informed that there was Stage build on 16th July and I was on my planned leave that week, therefore as discussed with Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar I didn't check-in the code to LB.
            Today I am going to check-in the code to LB.

            Show
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - shyam sharma As we were informed that there was Stage build on 16th July and I was on my planned leave that week, therefore as discussed with Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar I didn't check-in the code to LB. Today I am going to check-in the code to LB.
            Show
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Ramya Tantry Files affected - 1095C User Correction Files affected.xls
            Hide
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment -

            Executed all attached TC WT-2295 1095CUserCorrections-TestCases.xls with this JIRA.
            All TCs are pass, hence marking this JIRA ready for production.

            Show
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment - Executed all attached TC WT-2295 1095CUserCorrections-TestCases.xls with this JIRA. All TCs are pass, hence marking this JIRA ready for production.
            Hide
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment -

            Will close this JIRA once, WT-4667 and WT-4668 are closed.

            Show
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment - Will close this JIRA once, WT-4667 and WT-4668 are closed.
            Hide
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified all the TCs on production, working fine.

            Show
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment - Verified all the TCs on production, working fine.

              People

              Assignee:
              sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive)
              Account Executive:
              Chris Finocchio (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Kumar Chhajed (Inactive)
              QA:
              Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: