Details

    • Type: Support Activity
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Support Task Type:
      ACA Data Audit
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Company:
      Softchoice
    • Module:
      ACA

      Description


      Can you please explain this data and decision to jennifer leugres

        Attachments

        1. JanReport.jpg
          JanReport.jpg
          240 kB
        2. Lyla Razvi.png
          Lyla Razvi.png
          130 kB
        3. Mail.doc
          79 kB
        4. Re Aca files.msg
          2.02 MB

          Activity

          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) created issue -
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Attachment Mail.doc [ 17558 ]
          kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment Lyla Razvi.png [ 17560 ]
          Hide
          kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Hi Jennifer Leugers,Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

          Question :- I can’t find why the numbers for January for Softchoice on their 1094 form are 411 in b and 412 in c. 
          Answer :- As the employee Lyla Razvi,has code 1H and 2D on Line 16 in January month , therefore that employee is not considered in January month and the count is 411.

          Explanation -
          Please refer attachement

          As the Date of Employment '10/29/2014' of employee was changed to '01/16/2015' , hence the employee falls under Limited Non-Assessment period for the month of January. Also employee status is active from '10/29/2014' , so she is Full time throughout.

          As per the IRS Rule mentioned below -

          Column (b) Full-Time Employee Count for ALE Member. Enter the number of full-time employees for each month, but do not count any employee in a Limited Non-Assessment Period. (If the number of full-time employees (excluding employees in a Limited Non-Assessment Period) for a month is zero, enter “0”.)

          The Employee is not considered in Full-Time Employee Count for January month.

          Show
          kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Jennifer Leugers , Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Question :- I can’t find why the numbers for January for Softchoice on their 1094 form are 411 in b and 412 in c.  Answer :- As the employee Lyla Razvi,has code 1H and 2D on Line 16 in January month , therefore that employee is not considered in January month and the count is 411. Explanation - Please refer attachement As the Date of Employment '10/29/2014' of employee was changed to '01/16/2015' , hence the employee falls under Limited Non-Assessment period for the month of January. Also employee status is active from '10/29/2014' , so she is Full time throughout. As per the IRS Rule mentioned below - Column (b) Full-Time Employee Count for ALE Member. Enter the number of full-time employees for each month, but do not count any employee in a Limited Non-Assessment Period. (If the number of full-time employees (excluding employees in a Limited Non-Assessment Period) for a month is zero, enter “0”.) The Employee is not considered in Full-Time Employee Count for January month.
          kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Kumar Chhajed [ kumar.chhajed ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
          kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
          Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
          Hide
          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

          All I'm not sure I understand this. There have to be more than just this one employee that was hired mid-month at one point in 2015. All other months have the #s the same for both entries.

          Show
          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - All I'm not sure I understand this. There have to be more than just this one employee that was hired mid-month at one point in 2015. All other months have the #s the same for both entries.
          jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers made changes -
          Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
          Status Resolved [ 5 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
          Hide
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

          Ramya Tantry

          Please look into this

          Show
          nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Ramya Tantry Please look into this
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Reopened [ 4 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment JanReport.jpg [ 17806 ]
          Hide
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Jennifer Leugers,Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

          Please refer screen shot of employees hired in Jan month.

          Out of all these employees,EE Lyla Razvi was employed for whole month as she was active from 10/29/2014.
          Only her employment date is changed to 01/16/2015.So she is considered as employed for whole month in Jan.

          For the calculation of FTE,we consider employees who are full time and employed for whole month but exclude those who are in limited non assessment period.
          For the calculation of Total employees,we consider employees who are employed for whole month, irrespective of full time/part time status.
          As above mentioned employee is full time and employed for whole month, she is counted in total employee count.
          But as she falls in Limited non assessment period,she is not counted in FTE count.

          So the count differs in Jan month.
          No other employees in this company are new hire and employed for whole month at the same time.

          Show
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Jennifer Leugers , Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Please refer screen shot of employees hired in Jan month. Out of all these employees,EE Lyla Razvi was employed for whole month as she was active from 10/29/2014. Only her employment date is changed to 01/16/2015.So she is considered as employed for whole month in Jan. For the calculation of FTE,we consider employees who are full time and employed for whole month but exclude those who are in limited non assessment period. For the calculation of Total employees,we consider employees who are employed for whole month, irrespective of full time/part time status. As above mentioned employee is full time and employed for whole month, she is counted in total employee count. But as she falls in Limited non assessment period,she is not counted in FTE count. So the count differs in Jan month. No other employees in this company are new hire and employed for whole month at the same time.
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Progress [ 3 ] Open [ 1 ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
          ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
          Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
          shubhankar Shubhankar Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Jennifer Leugers made transition -
          Resolved Reopen
          3d 14h 7m 1
          Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made transition -
          Reopen In Progress
          12h 42m 1
          Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made transition -
          In Progress Open
          33m 40s 1
          Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made transition -
          Open Resolved
          1h 39m 2
          Shubhankar Joshi (Inactive) made transition -
          Resolved Closed
          15d 20h 28m 1

            People

            Assignee:
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers
            Reporter:
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive)
            Account Executive:
            Jennifer Leugers
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: