Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekarshyam sharma

Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Rakesh Roy shyam sharma

Hi Jennifer Leugers,

As discussed in yesterday's call, please check this with client.
Let us know if you need any help on this.

Thanks,
Sachin Hingole

Hi all - please see below from the Client. We are not taking 1C into account the way it seems like we should per the below. I believe the three entities are being listed as no on #23 due to the 1Cs that are on line 14. According to the below, "dependents" do not include spouses.

_So where I think the difference is, on the irs.gov website instructions, for purposes of these filings the definition of dependent does not include Spouse. I agree with your statements of the logic of that field, except that spouses should not be considered as dependents.

https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i109495c/ar01.html#d0e624

Dependent. A dependent is an employee’s child, including a child who has been legally adopted or legally placed for adoption with the employee, who has not reached age 26. A child reaches age 26 on the 26th anniversary of the date the child was born and is treated as a dependent for the entire calendar month during which he or she reaches age 26. For this purpose, a dependent does not include stepchildren, foster children, or a child that does not reside in the United States (or a country contiguous to the United States) and who is not a United States citizen or national. For this purpose, a dependent does not include a spouse.

That said, all of our forms need to have that checked as Yes._

Hi Sachin Hingole, please check Jennifer Leugers' last comment.

CC: Vijay Siddha, Satya, Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar, Rakesh Roy

Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Ramya Tantry shyam sharma Rakesh Roy

Hi Jennifer Leugers,

We have done the changes on Austin Production.
Please refer latest run of below 1094C reports

Austin Industrial Services, LP (EIN 760623024)
Austin Industrial Specialty Services, Inc. (EIN 270637340)
Austin Maintenance & Construction (EIN 760623027)

March month is marked as NO for MEC on 1094C PDF of "Austin Industrial Services, LP" as total full employee count is 1719 and offer (1A, 1E and 1C) given to 1619 and percentage is 94.18, hence Part III MEC is marked NO.

Thanks,
Sachin Hingole

Hi all - for those showing a 1H and blank for March under Industrial Services, can we change it to a 1A/2H (please see attached Austin month of March)?

The client is adamant that they all had a qualifying offer and want the 1094C to show as yes on line 23.

Please advise.

Thanks,
Jen

Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Ramya Tantry Yogesh Chaudhari Sachin Hingole Rakesh Roy shyam sharma Sachin Khandge

Hi Jennifer Leugers,

CONCERN :
Required 1A / 2H instead of 1H for mentioned employees in excel sheet.

CAUSE :
The client is adamant that they all had a qualifying offer and want the 1094C to show as yes on line 23.

CORRECTION :
1. We done correction for 89 employees as 1A / 2H out of 100 employees.
2. And for 11 employees from excel sheet highlighed in red color employees are finding multiple by searching first name and last name. Hence we are requesting you to please provide for them unique id i.e. social security no to complete the correction for 11 employees. Austin month of March JL_Red Highlighted 11EmployeesRequiredUniqueInfo.xls (Pass-ACA***)

Regards,
Revan

Please see attached

Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Ramya Tantry Kumar Chhajed Yogesh Chaudhari Sachin Hingole Rakesh Roy shyam sharma Sachin Khandge

Hi Jennifer Leugers,

Concern:
Required unique ids for 11 Employees for correction.

Cause :
Multiple employees for matching first name & last name.

Correction :
Only sent for 6 employees out of 11 employees. We updated the same for 6 employees.
Another 5 employees list is required uniqueness i.e. remained.

Regards,
Revan

Hi Jennifer Leugers

CC- Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Sachin Hingole Ramya Tantry Smita Pawar

After correction made by development team , we have re run the "1095C - Austin Industrial Services LP - 6/28/2016 1:19:17 AM". We have download the latest run and verify the expected code for March month. Observed that codes are populating as per requested.

Below are the verified employee list.
1.James Alford
2.Alonzo DeLeon
3.MAGDALENO GARCIA
4.ALEJANDRO LEIJA
5.Dainmium Powell
6.Daniel Shoultz
7.MICHAEL THEILER

Note - Still we have not received the requested 5 employee details by Revan.For more details see attached screen shot -"StillNotReceiveUniqueIDs.png"

Jennifer Leugers - FYI -
Below scenario we have generated on Austin for HSPL -

We run 1094C - Austin Industrial Services LP and observed that line 23 on 1094C is checked Yes for 12 months.We have created XML for - “1094C - Austin Industrial Services LP ”. Application created Invalid file and throw below error

Transmission file is not valid to submit on IRS Portal. Please correct below errors..
--------------
The element 'USAddressGrp' in namespace 'urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:ext:aca:air:7.0' has invalid child element 'USZIPCd' in namespace 'urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:common'. List of possible elements expected: 'USStateCd' in namespace 'urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:ext:aca:air:7.0'.
--------------
We did analysis on same and observed that Jose Fernandez Medina EE belongs to non US county and blank state. Hence we suggest that change the country of EE and select state or remove same EE using additional eligibility criteria and re run the 1095C , 1094C then generate IRS submission for Austin Industrial Services.

Please let us know for any query.

Thanks,
Mahendra.

The client would like to remove the non-US address employees from 1095C file / filing. Please remove them, re-run the file and the IRS submission. Thanks!

Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

Hi Jennifer Leugers,

We have removed the non-US address employees from 1095C and run the file and IRS Submission. You can now download the valid IRS Submission zip file. Refer