Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-3955

Tierwise cost is not changing in the ELIG ELEMENT. It always displayed cost of enrolled plan.

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      QA
    • Module:
      ACA - Reports
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      Tier wise cost is not changing in the ELIG element on the file. It always displayed same EE cost of enrolled plan for all tiers.

      Please refer to employee 100000013 from 'ACA Automation' company.
      Template Name - BSG - S

      Steps to repro

      Env: LB
      Company: ACA Automation
      SSN:100000013
      Element: ELIG

      Step:-
      1.Login to application
      2.Navigate to Import Export > Manual Import Export >Select Export radio button>BSG-S
      3.From date -01/01/2016-01/31/2016
      4.Click on Export button
      5.Download file

      Actual:- Tier wise cost should reflect on the file.
      Expected:- Tier wise cost should reflect on the file which is not reflecting now.

      Note: Please delete run-rate maintenance as its a full file. Let us know if you need any additional information.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Concern: Tierwise cost is not changing in the ELIG ELEMENT. It always displayed cost of enrolled plan.
            Cause: In Fields table,destination column name was set to a value which was getting referred for enrollment details.
            So enrolled plan cost was displayed for all.
            Correction: We have updated the destination column name.

            Files affected:
            07_Data/074_WT3955_WTB_ACA_ModData_Fields.sql
            07_data/075_WT3955_WTB_ACA_ModData_Fields.sql
            03_Views/dbo.OES_VIEW_ACA_Export_Eligibility.View.sql

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Concern : Tierwise cost is not changing in the ELIG ELEMENT. It always displayed cost of enrolled plan. Cause : In Fields table,destination column name was set to a value which was getting referred for enrollment details. So enrolled plan cost was displayed for all. Correction : We have updated the destination column name. Files affected : 07_Data/074_WT3955_WTB_ACA_ModData_Fields.sql 07_data/075_WT3955_WTB_ACA_ModData_Fields.sql 03_Views/dbo.OES_VIEW_ACA_Export_Eligibility.View.sql
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on LB (ACA Automation company). Its
            working fine. But we will move this Jira to stage when BSG- ACA File implementation Jira 2601.
            Hence marking this ticket as on LB-On hold.

            Attaching Screen shot for verified employee.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on LB (ACA Automation company). Its working fine. But we will move this Jira to stage when BSG- ACA File implementation Jira 2601. Hence marking this ticket as on LB-On hold. Attaching Screen shot for verified employee.
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company [ACA Automation].
            For below mentioned employee, we have verified tier wise cost.
            Now tier wise correct cost is displaying on the file

            OFFR|100000020|Employee Data Change|Employee Data Change|01/01/2016|01/01/2016|01/01/2016|12/31/2016|08/09/2016 03:19:57.1957 PM
            ELIG|100000020|Employee Data Change|BSGPlanTwo_OLD|BSG plan Two|EE|Employee|Y|120.00|220.00|Y|Y|YES|YES|Y|64.71|Y|
            ELIG|100000020|Employee Data Change|BSGPlanTwo_OLD|BSG plan Two|EE+Family|Employee + Family|Y|125.00|225.00|Y|Y|YES|YES|Y|64.29|Y|
            ELIG|100000020|Employee Data Change|BSGPlanTwo_OLD|BSG plan Two|EE + CH|Employee + 1|Y|125.00|225.00|Y|Y|YES|YES|Y|64.29|Y|
            ELIG|100000020|Employee Data Change|BSGPlanTwo_OLD|BSG plan Two|EE + SP|Employee + Spouse|Y|125.00|225.00|Y|Y|YES|YES|Y|64.29|Y|

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on stage company [ACA Automation] . For below mentioned employee, we have verified tier wise cost. Now tier wise correct cost is displaying on the file OFFR|100000020|Employee Data Change|Employee Data Change|01/01/2016|01/01/2016|01/01/2016|12/31/2016|08/09/2016 03:19:57.1957 PM ELIG|100000020|Employee Data Change|BSGPlanTwo_OLD|BSG plan Two|EE|Employee|Y|120.00|220.00|Y|Y|YES|YES|Y|64.71|Y| ELIG|100000020|Employee Data Change|BSGPlanTwo_OLD|BSG plan Two|EE+Family|Employee + Family|Y|125.00|225.00|Y|Y|YES|YES|Y|64.29|Y| ELIG|100000020|Employee Data Change|BSGPlanTwo_OLD|BSG plan Two|EE + CH|Employee + 1|Y|125.00|225.00|Y|Y|YES|YES|Y|64.29|Y| ELIG|100000020|Employee Data Change|BSGPlanTwo_OLD|BSG plan Two|EE + SP|Employee + Spouse|Y|125.00|225.00|Y|Y|YES|YES|Y|64.29|Y|
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We will move this Jira to Production with WT-2601

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We will move this Jira to Production with WT-2601
            Hide
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment -

            Company Name - For ACA BSGTest ACAAutomation HSPL

            We have regressed this issue on Production and observed that issue does not exist. Hence closing the same.

            Show
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) added a comment - Company Name - For ACA BSGTest ACAAutomation HSPL We have regressed this issue on Production and observed that issue does not exist. Hence closing the same.

              People

              Assignee:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              QA:
              Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: