-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Low
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ACA
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:QA
-
Module:ACA
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Item State:Production Complete - Closed
-
Issue Importance:Can Wait
Report Name- 1095C Class AC
Company - ACAAutomation
Run 1- 10/18/2016 1:57:27 PM
Run 2 - 10/18/2016 1:58:15 PM
Screen Shot - No_Continuous_12records_For_Single_SSN.jpg
Step:-
1.Import employee of same name with different SSN
2.Run 1095C without Eligibility Rule for Multi Employer
3.Run 1095C with Eligibility Rule for Multi Employer
4.Navigate to Benadmin > ACA >
ACA Customization > ACA 1095C Comparison
5.“Select 1095C report” drop down
6.Select Run 1 & 2 and click on Show Report
Expected - There should be continuous 12 row for same SSN
Actual - It display mixed SSN in comparison report
- is caused by
-
WT-2691 ACA-2017 : Comparision between two different runs of 1095C report.
-
- Closed
-
Please find 3 C's for mentioned issue below,
Concern: Incorrect SSN order in comparison report
Cause: We used to sort records as per EmployeeName, EmployeeType, Month. But data provided on this company is one of a kind. If you observe employees from Screen-shot, all employees have same name "Davis Davim" with SSN in in creasing order as given below,
Davim Davim- 300000041
Davim Davim- 300000041
Davim Davim- 300000041
Please find 3 C's for mentioned issue below,
Concern: Incorrect SSN order in comparison report
Cause: We used to sort records as per EmployeeName, Member Type, Month. But data provided on this company is one of a kind. If you observe employees from Screen-shot, all employees have same name "Davis Davim" with SSN in increasing order as given below,
- Davim Davim- 300000041
- Davim Davim- 300000042
- Davim Davim- 300000043
- Davim Davim- 300000044
Which is rarest scenario, No company will have employee with same name and sequential SSN. Although we have changed ordering condition in SP.
Correction: We have changed ordering condition in SP. Now, employees are sorted in order of Name, SSN and Month.
We have regressed this issue and observed that it's working as expected.Hence marking ready for Production.
Verified on production, working fine.
Now employee are ordered correctly on SSN.
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
added a comment - Verified on production, working fine.
Now employee are ordered correctly on SSN.
We have regressed this issue and observed that it's working as expected.Hence marking ready for stage.
Abhijeet Khandagale - Can you please add 3C?